The Winter 2007 reading seminar on D-modules and representation theory meets on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. in East Hall 3096.
We are reading through Dennis' Gaitsgory's notes on geometric representation theory, which are available at http://www.math.harvard.edu/~gaitsgde/267y/catO.pdf. If time permits, we hope to talk about some other aspects of the proof of the Kazhdan-Lustztig conjectures.
Other references include:
Schedule of Speakers | |
---|---|
January 17, 2007 | Sue Sierra: An overview of Category O |
January 24, 2007 | David Speyer: Chevalley and Harish-Chandra isomorphisms |
January 31, 2007 | Tatyana Chmutova: Further properties of Category O |
February 7, 2007 | Review of first three lectures |
February 14, 2007 | Alan Stapledon: Projective objects in O |
February 21, 2007 | Mircea Mustata: D-modules |
February 24, 2007 | No meeting: spring break |
March 7, 2007 | Mircea Mustata: D-modules, part 2 |
March 14, 2007 | No meeting |
March 21, 2007 | Kyle Hofmann: Localization theory |
March 28, 2007 | Loren Spice: Some algebraic geometry related to g |
April 4, 2007 | Renzo Cavalieri: D-bundles and integrable hierarchies: a sneak preview. |
April 11, 2007 | Ezra Miller: Why make representation theory geometric? The Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture via intersection cohomology |
Renzo Cavalieri, April 4, 2007
D-bundles and integrable hierarchies: a sneak preview.
Recently Tom Nevins and David Ben-Zvi have used the geometry of D-bundles over elliptic curves to understand a classical correspondence between solutions of integrable hierarchies (KP and CM). In May we are hosting a three day workshop on this work. (see http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~crenzo/workshop/bn.html for more details) In this talk we will give a galloping preview of what awaits us...
Why make representation theory geometric? The Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture via intersection cohomology
Kazhdan and Lusztig conjectured how to decompose Verma modules
in terms of their irreducible submodules. Geometric
representation theory suggests that instead of decomposing
g-modules algebraically, one should instead work on flag
varieties, where the constructible sheaves corresponding to
Verma modules decompose into those for their irreducible
submodules. A rough outline of the talk is as follows:
1. How Beilinson-Bernstein equivalence generalizes Borel-Weil
2. From g-modules to constructible sheaves
3. ... to intersection cohomology
4. ... to K-L polynomials
5. ... and back to g-modules.
The talk will be self-contained; prior attendance at this reading seminar will not be a prerequisite.
Last updated November 29, 2009