Text size

Section 84

The distinguished surface and a double conic

Put p:Q=ℙℙ1×ℙ1(𝒪⊕𝒪(−1,−1)⊕2)→ℙ1×ℙ1,ξ=𝒪Q(1),p:Q=\mathbb P_{\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1} \bigl(\mathcal O\oplus\mathcal O(-1,-1)^{\oplus2}\bigr) \longrightarrow\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1, \qquad \xi=\mathcal O_Q(1), using the quotient convention. We use coordinates [x0:x1][x_0:x_1], [y0:y1][y_0:y_1] on the two factors. Write AA and BB for their hyperplane classes, also pulled back to QQ and XX. Thus X∈|2ξ+2A+3B|X\in|2\xi+2A+3B|, and its equation has the form q(y;u1,u2)+u0(g1(x,y)u1+g2(x,y)u2)+h(x,y)u02=0,q(y;u_1,u_2)+u_0\bigl(g_1(x,y)u_1+g_2(x,y)u_2\bigr) +h(x,y)u_0^2=0, where qq has degrees (1,2)(1,2) in yy and (u1,u2)(u_1,u_2), the gig_i have bidegree (1,2)(1,2) in (x,y)(x,y), and hh has bidegree (2,3)(2,3). The classes of u0,u1,u2u_0,u_1,u_2 are respectively ξ,ξ+A+B,ξ+A+B\xi,\xi+A+B,\xi+A+B. Put D=X∩{u0=0}D=X\cap\{u_0=0\}. The classification requires DD to be irreducible. Adjunction gives −KX=D+2A+B-K_X=D+2A+B. In the notation in which F1F_1 is a sextic del Pezzo fibre and F2F_2 is a cubic fibre, we have F1=BF_1=B and F2=AF_2=A.

Lemma 84.1. The surface DD is smooth and isomorphic to ℙ1×ℙ1\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1, and 𝒪D(D)=𝒪(−1,−1)\mathcal O_D(D)=\mathcal O(-1,-1). Its map to the base of the conic bundle is the product of the identity and a morphism of degree two between projective lines. In particular, this map has two distinct branch values on the second factor. Every double conic of p|Xp|_X lies above one of these values, and its reduced support meets DD in one point.

Proof. On {u0=0}\{u_0=0\} the equation is y0q0(u1,u2)+y1q1(u1,u2)=0y_0q_0(u_1,u_2)+y_1q_1(u_1,u_2)=0. If the binary quadratics q0,q1q_0,q_1 had a common factor, this equation would be reducible, contrary to the hypothesis on DD. They are therefore relatively prime. Consequently, the curve defined by this equation in ℙy1×ℙu1,u21\mathbb P^1_y\times\mathbb P^1_{u_1,u_2} is the graph of the morphism [u1:u2]↦[−q1:q0][u_1:u_2]\mapsto[-q_1:q_0], of degree two. Denote this graph by RR. Thus D=ℙx1×RD=\mathbb P^1_x\times R. On this product, A|D=𝒪(1,0)A|_D=\mathcal O(1,0), B|D=𝒪(0,2)B|_D=\mathcal O(0,2), and (ξ+A+B)|D=𝒪(0,1)(\xi+A+B)|_D=\mathcal O(0,1), whence ξ|D=𝒪(−1,−1)\xi|_D=\mathcal O(-1,-1). A degree-two morphism between smooth projective lines in characteristic zero has two ramification points, with distinct images.

Suppose that the conic over a base point is twice a line ℓ\ell. The line ℓ\ell cannot be {u0=0}\{u_0=0\}: otherwise the corresponding member of the pencil ⟨q0,q1⟩\langle q_0,q_1\rangle would vanish identically. Its restriction to u0=0u_0=0 is therefore a nonzero square. This is exactly the ramification condition for R→ℙy1R\to\mathbb P^1_y, and the unique zero of the square is D∩ℓD\cap\ell. ◻

Lemma 84.2. Let 2ℓ2\ell be a double conic. After changing coordinates, its base point is ([1:0],[1:0])([1:0],[1:0]), and on the chart x0=y0=1x_0=y_0=1 the equation of XX is z2+af(r,s)+bg(r,s)+terms of weight greater than two=0,z^2+a f(r,s)+b g(r,s)+\text{terms of weight greater than two}=0, f=s(cr+ds),g=r2+ers+hs2.f=s(cr+ds),\qquad g=r^2+e rs+h s^2. Here a=x1a=x_1, b=y1b=y_1, s=u0s=u_0, r=u1r=u_1, the weights of (z,a,b)(z,a,b) are (1,2,2)(1,2,2), and [r:s][r:s] are homogeneous coordinates on ℓ\ell. The binary quadratics f,gf,g have no common zero, and (c,d)≠(0,0)(c,d)\ne(0,0). Either one, or both, of f,gf,g may be a square.

The weighted initial equation in the homogeneous coordinate ring of QQ is F0=y0z2+x1y02u0(cr+dx0y0u0)+y1(r2+ex0y0u0r+hx02y02u02).F_0=y_0z^2+x_1y_0^2u_0(cr+d x_0y_0u_0) +y_1\bigl(r^2+e x_0y_0u_0r+h x_0^2y_0^2u_0^2\bigr). It is irreducible. The corresponding homogeneous weights are wt(x0,x1,y0,y1,u0,r,z)=(0,2,0,2,0,0,1).\operatorname{wt}(x_0,x_1,y_0,y_1,u_0,r,z)=(0,2,0,2,0,0,1).

Proof. The two singular members of the base-point-free pencil of binary quadratics defining DD are distinct squares. Hence we may arrange q=y0u22+y1u12q=y_0u_2^2+y_1u_1^2. Choose the first branch value to be y1=0y_1=0, and move the first coordinate of the double conic to x1=0x_1=0. Since the conic there has rank one, its equation is a nonzero multiple of (u2+λu0)2(u_2+\lambda u_0)^2 on x0=y0=1x_0=y_0=1. The homogeneous change z=u2+λx0y0u0z=u_2+\lambda x_0y_0u_0 is permitted by the classes of these coordinates. Rescaling gives the stated coefficient of z2z^2.

The quadratic terms in u1,u2u_1,u_2 are independent of xx. Thus the coefficient of aa in the initial equation is divisible by ss, whereas the coefficient of bb restricts to r2r^2 on s=0s=0. Homogeneity gives exactly the displayed form of F0F_0. At a point of ℓ\ell, both fibre derivatives vanish because the fibre is a double line. The two remaining derivatives are ff and gg. Smoothness of XX therefore implies that f,gf,g have no common zero. In particular ff is not identically zero.

Write g0=r2+ex0y0u0r+hx02y02u02g_0=r^2+e x_0y_0u_0r+h x_0^2y_0^2u_0^2. Consider F0F_0 as a polynomial of degree one in y1y_1. Its leading coefficient is g0g_0. A common divisor of this coefficient and its constant term would divide y0z2y_0z^2; since g0g_0 is independent of zz and is not divisible by y0y_0, no such divisor exists. Gauss’s lemma now proves irreducibility. Finally, the conditions obtained above only assert that f,gf,g are nonzero and relatively prime. They do not assert that their individual roots are distinct. ◻

Example 84.3. The pairs (f,g)=(sr,r2+s2)(f,g)=(sr,r^2+s^2), (s2,r2+s2)(s^2,r^2+s^2), and (s2,r2)(s^2,r^2) all satisfy the local smoothness condition along ℓ\ell. The second has a square ff, and the third has both quadratics square. These examples concern the normal form along the double conic; no assertion about the other fibres is needed. In particular, one must retain the square cases in a proof for the whole family.

Lemma 84.4. Let μ:X̃→X\mu:\widetilde X\to X be the normalization of the blowup of the ideal of the scheme-theoretic fibre 2ℓ2\ell, and let GG be its exceptional divisor. Then μ\mu is the weighted blowup with weights (1,2)(1,2) transverse to ℓ\ell, and AX(G)=3,G≅ℙ[r:s]1×ℙ[a:b]1.A_X(G)=3,\qquad G\cong\mathbb P^1_{[r:s]}\times\mathbb P^1_{[a:b]}. The pair (X̃,G)(\widetilde X,G) is purely log terminal near GG, and (KX̃+G)|G=KG+12Γ,Γ={af(r,s)+bg(r,s)=0}.(K_{\widetilde X}+G)|_G=K_G+\tfrac12\Gamma, \qquad \Gamma=\{af(r,s)+bg(r,s)=0\}. The curve Γ\Gamma is smooth, has bidegree (2,1)(2,1), and is the graph of the morphism [r:s]↦[−g(r,s):f(r,s)][r:s]\mapsto[-g(r,s):f(r,s)]. Moreover, Nℓ/X≅𝒪ℙ1(1)⊕𝒪ℙ1(−2)N_{\ell/X}\cong\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(1) \oplus\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-2).

Proof. The fibre ideal is (a,b)(a,b). Wherever g≠0g\ne0, the equation allows us to eliminate bb, and (a,b)=(a,z2)(a,b)=(a,z^2). More precisely, write the equation as z2+aF+bG1=0z^2+aF+bG_1=0 with G1G_1 a unit on this open set; then the two ideals coincide in the local ring of XX. The analogous statement holds wherever f≠0f\ne0. These two open sets cover ℓ\ell. The normalization of the blowup of (a,z2)(a,z^2) is the weighted blowup of the regular parameters (z,a)(z,a) with weights (1,2)(1,2). Its log discrepancy is 1+2=31+2=3.

The weighted exceptional equation is z2+af+bg=0z^2+af+bg=0, with zz of weight one and a,ba,b of weight two. Its second Veronese eliminates z2z^2 and leaves the two base coordinates a,ba,b. Since a,ba,b are coordinates on the fixed base surface, their transition functions along ℓ\ell are trivial. Hence its coarse surface is the stated product. The weight-two chart is an index-two quotient chart; the index-two locus on GG is z=0z=0. Adjunction on the index-one cover therefore gives different Γ/2\Gamma/2. The same quotient description proves that the extraction is purely log terminal. The coprimality of f,gf,g identifies Γ\Gamma with the graph of a morphism, proving its smoothness.

For the last assertion, the normal sequence of ℓ⊂X⊂Q\ell\subset X\subset Q is 0→Nℓ/X→𝒪(1)⊕𝒪⊕𝒪→(0,f,g)𝒪(2)→0.0\longrightarrow N_{\ell/X}\longrightarrow \mathcal O(1)\oplus\mathcal O\oplus\mathcal O \xrightarrow{(0,f,g)}\mathcal O(2)\longrightarrow0. The map is surjective by coprimality, and the kernel of its last two summands is 𝒪(−2)\mathcal O(-2). This proves the splitting. ◻

Remark 84.5. The surface GG is smooth, but the different Γ/2\Gamma/2 must be included in every discrepancy calculation on it. The ordinary blowup of ℓ\ell has exceptional surface 𝔽3\mathbb F_3; this is not the extraction used above. The weighted extraction is useful because its second Veronese has the simple product description, allowing the restricted graded series to be computed directly from the homogeneous coordinate ring. This does not require a Zariski decomposition on X̃\widetilde X.

Lemma 84.6. Let F2F_2 be the cubic surface fibre containing 2ℓ2\ell. If gg has two distinct roots, then F2F_2 has exactly two singular points on ℓ\ell, both of type A1A_1. Thus the double fibres not covered by the generality condition of Belousov–Loginov are exactly those for which gg is a square. In this remaining case one may write g=r2,f=s(cr+ds),d≠0.g=r^2,\qquad f=s(cr+ds),\qquad d\ne0. No restriction c≠0c\ne0 is justified.

Proof. The cubic fibre is a=0a=0. At a point of ℓ\ell, its derivative in the bb direction is gg, so its singular points on ℓ\ell are precisely the zeros of gg. If vv is a local parameter on ℓ\ell at a simple zero, the quadratic part of its local equation in (z,b,v)(z,b,v) is z2+κbv+λbz+νb2z^2+\kappa bv+\lambda bz+\nu b^2, with κ≠0\kappa\ne0. It is nondegenerate, so the singularity is A1A_1. At a double zero, the quadratic part has no term involving vv and is degenerate; the singularity is not A1A_1. These assertions concern the surface only along ℓ\ell, as required by the cited generality condition. If gg is a square, replace rr by r+λsr+\lambda s to obtain g=r2g=r^2. The form of ff is preserved by this change, and coprimality gives d≠0d\ne0. ◻