Section 84
The distinguished surface and a double conic
Put using the quotient convention. We use coordinates , on the two factors. Write and for their hyperplane classes, also pulled back to and . Thus , and its equation has the form where has degrees in and , the have bidegree in , and has bidegree . The classes of are respectively . Put . The classification requires to be irreducible. Adjunction gives . In the notation in which is a sextic del Pezzo fibre and is a cubic fibre, we have and .
Lemma 84.1. The surface is smooth and isomorphic to , and . Its map to the base of the conic bundle is the product of the identity and a morphism of degree two between projective lines. In particular, this map has two distinct branch values on the second factor. Every double conic of lies above one of these values, and its reduced support meets in one point.
Proof. On the equation is . If the binary quadratics had a common factor, this equation would be reducible, contrary to the hypothesis on . They are therefore relatively prime. Consequently, the curve defined by this equation in is the graph of the morphism , of degree two. Denote this graph by . Thus . On this product, , , and , whence . A degree-two morphism between smooth projective lines in characteristic zero has two ramification points, with distinct images.
Suppose that the conic over a base point is twice a line . The line cannot be : otherwise the corresponding member of the pencil would vanish identically. Its restriction to is therefore a nonzero square. This is exactly the ramification condition for , and the unique zero of the square is . ◻
Lemma 84.2. Let be a double conic. After changing coordinates, its base point is , and on the chart the equation of is Here , , , , the weights of are , and are homogeneous coordinates on . The binary quadratics have no common zero, and . Either one, or both, of may be a square.
The weighted initial equation in the homogeneous coordinate ring of is It is irreducible. The corresponding homogeneous weights are
Proof. The two singular members of the base-point-free pencil of binary quadratics defining are distinct squares. Hence we may arrange . Choose the first branch value to be , and move the first coordinate of the double conic to . Since the conic there has rank one, its equation is a nonzero multiple of on . The homogeneous change is permitted by the classes of these coordinates. Rescaling gives the stated coefficient of .
The quadratic terms in are independent of . Thus the coefficient of in the initial equation is divisible by , whereas the coefficient of restricts to on . Homogeneity gives exactly the displayed form of . At a point of , both fibre derivatives vanish because the fibre is a double line. The two remaining derivatives are and . Smoothness of therefore implies that have no common zero. In particular is not identically zero.
Write . Consider as a polynomial of degree one in . Its leading coefficient is . A common divisor of this coefficient and its constant term would divide ; since is independent of and is not divisible by , no such divisor exists. Gauss’s lemma now proves irreducibility. Finally, the conditions obtained above only assert that are nonzero and relatively prime. They do not assert that their individual roots are distinct. ◻
Example 84.3. The pairs , , and all satisfy the local smoothness condition along . The second has a square , and the third has both quadratics square. These examples concern the normal form along the double conic; no assertion about the other fibres is needed. In particular, one must retain the square cases in a proof for the whole family.
Lemma 84.4. Let be the normalization of the blowup of the ideal of the scheme-theoretic fibre , and let be its exceptional divisor. Then is the weighted blowup with weights transverse to , and The pair is purely log terminal near , and The curve is smooth, has bidegree , and is the graph of the morphism . Moreover, .
Proof. The fibre ideal is . Wherever , the equation allows us to eliminate , and . More precisely, write the equation as with a unit on this open set; then the two ideals coincide in the local ring of . The analogous statement holds wherever . These two open sets cover . The normalization of the blowup of is the weighted blowup of the regular parameters with weights . Its log discrepancy is .
The weighted exceptional equation is , with of weight one and of weight two. Its second Veronese eliminates and leaves the two base coordinates . Since are coordinates on the fixed base surface, their transition functions along are trivial. Hence its coarse surface is the stated product. The weight-two chart is an index-two quotient chart; the index-two locus on is . Adjunction on the index-one cover therefore gives different . The same quotient description proves that the extraction is purely log terminal. The coprimality of identifies with the graph of a morphism, proving its smoothness.
For the last assertion, the normal sequence of is The map is surjective by coprimality, and the kernel of its last two summands is . This proves the splitting. ◻
Remark 84.5. The surface is smooth, but the different must be included in every discrepancy calculation on it. The ordinary blowup of has exceptional surface ; this is not the extraction used above. The weighted extraction is useful because its second Veronese has the simple product description, allowing the restricted graded series to be computed directly from the homogeneous coordinate ring. This does not require a Zariski decomposition on .
Lemma 84.6. Let be the cubic surface fibre containing . If has two distinct roots, then has exactly two singular points on , both of type . Thus the double fibres not covered by the generality condition of Belousov–Loginov are exactly those for which is a square. In this remaining case one may write No restriction is justified.
Proof. The cubic fibre is . At a point of , its derivative in the direction is , so its singular points on are precisely the zeros of . If is a local parameter on at a simple zero, the quadratic part of its local equation in is , with . It is nondegenerate, so the singularity is . At a double zero, the quadratic part has no term involving and is degenerate; the singularity is not . These assertions concern the surface only along , as required by the cited generality condition. If is a square, replace by to obtain . The form of is preserved by this change, and coprimality gives . ◻