Section 112
The singular point of an fibre
Proposition 112.1. Let be the singular point of a fibre with an singularity. Then .
Lemma 112.2. Let be the blow-up of , and let be its exceptional plane. There are homogeneous coordinates on such that the refined anticanonical section algebra is generated, in anticanonical degree one, by The primary degrees are the ordinary polynomial degrees in . For every , a basis of its anticanonical degree- part consists of (37.A1)
Proof. Write the two bilinear forms defining the flag threefold and this fibre as The singular point is . In the chart put , , . The flag equation gives , and the fibre equation becomes A basis of the restrictions of bilinear forms can be chosen with the following eight least homogeneous terms: Indeed one can use the actual functions . The other generator of the pencil is a unit at , since its base curve misses every singular point of a fibre. Rescale it so that . The base coordinate is . The anticanonical bundle is in the incidence presentation of . Its sections are products of the eight bilinear sections with , modulo the one relation . Removing from the first group gives precisely the fifteen least terms in the statement. Thus the displayed algebra is contained in the actual associated graded algebra.
We prove equality in every degree, rather than assuming generation of an associated graded ring in degree one. A monomial with requires exactly factors among , with as in (37.A1). For example, when , pair as many ’s as possible with ’s, and use for the remaining pairs of ’s. Its factors may each carry one extra , and the remaining slots may carry , or . This proves that every monomial in (37.A1) belongs to degree . Conversely, reduce every factor by . For the first summand decreases by at least one while increases by one; for the second does not increase. Hence both inequalities are preserved. Normal monomials are independent, since has leading monomial and they are its standard monomials.
For there are exactly normal monomials of cost . For there are two. For each of the two branches or , there are . Consequently the number in degree is The inclusion of graded algebras is therefore equality in every degree. In particular these are the actual refined section spaces. ◻
Lemma 112.3. Fix the primary degree and the weight for the action , and put . The corresponding component is zero unless and . Otherwise put It is zero if . If , it is the complete binary space (37.A2) Its dimension is .
Proof. In (37.A1) the prescribed gradings give , when (and the symmetric formula when ), and . The two inequalities in (37.A1) say exactly . All integers in this interval occur. Factoring its two endpoints proves (37.A2). This also proves completeness; the argument does not replace a section space by its Newton polygon. ◻
Lemma 112.4. Normalize sums of vanishing orders by , where . In the binary spaces (37.A2) the limiting fixed coefficients of and the limiting half movable degree are, respectively, Moreover .
Proof. Here are explicit finite sums for the calculation. Sum over , , retaining only as in Lemma 112.3. Every summand has weight . The quantities to sum are For even the resulting sums, in this order, are These identities follow by substituting the displayed lower and upper endpoints and summing the arithmetic progressions. They also provide a direct calculation of all the constants: divide the first four sums by and the last by . Floors and ceilings change only lower-order terms, so the same limits hold without the parity restriction. Finally the average ordinary degree is By definition this is . The sum of the primary degrees is in fact for every . To check this without a parity argument, group the normal monomials by the cost in (37.A1). For , the monomials have total ordinary degree The first term comes from ; in either remaining branch, contributes degrees , while contributes degrees (and similarly for ). Writing , summation over consequently gives which evaluates to the stated polynomial. Equality of the normal algebra with the actual refinement was proved in Lemma 112.2, so these are the valuation weights. ◻
Lemma 112.5. On put , , , and , with and . Suppose For arbitrary nonnegative , the pair is log canonical if and
Proof. The first four quantities bound the coefficients of all components. Away from and the support has simple normal crossings. At each of these two points the pencil is in local coordinates. Two successive ordinary blow-ups resolve all its members simultaneously. The exceptional valuations have weights and , and log discrepancies two and three. Their orders on are at most and exactly , respectively. After the second blow-up all distinct branches meet the last exceptional curve at different points. Thus the stated inequalities give a log resolution with all boundary coefficients at most one. This proves the claim for every valuation, including valuations above the exceptional curves. ◻
Proof of Proposition 112.1. For an arbitrary basis of a complete degree- binary space, the sum of the vanishing orders at any prescribed point of is at most , whereas its total degree is . Consequently arbitrary bases in the components (37.A2) give divisors of the form in Lemma 112.5. The limiting component bounds are The limiting exceptional orders are and , whose ratios to the discrepancies are and . The largest of all six ratios is . Hence for every all sufficiently high-degree basis divisors in these components give log canonical pairs after multiplication by , uniformly over the choices of bases.
Now fix a divisorial valuation over . In each already fixed primary-degree piece choose a basis compatible with its valuation filtration and the displayed torus-weight filtration; this uses only the two-filtration lemma. Its least-weight terms are bases in (37.A2). Degeneration under this one-parameter subgroup and lower semicontinuity of log canonical thresholds give the same bound for the original valuation-adapted basis. Passing to the limit gives The ordinary point blow-up is a plt extraction and has zero different. Abban–Zhuang adjunction therefore gives No Zariski decomposition on has been used. The calculation used actual sections, an exact Hilbert count in every degree, and a resolution of a conic pencil on its exceptional plane. ◻
Example 112.6. In anticanonical degree one the primary-degree-two, torus-weight-zero component is . A basis adapted to is , whereas one adapted to is . The two bases illustrate why the complete binary spaces must be retained: choosing just the original monomial basis would miss cancellation along .