Text size

Section 32

Geometry and the reduction to point centres

Family 2.12: intersections of three bilinear divisors

Let X⊂ℙ3×ℙ3X\subset\mathbb P^3\times\mathbb P^3 be a smooth complete intersection of three divisors of bidegree (1,1)(1,1). Write H,H′H,H' for the two hyperplane classes restricted to XX. Both projections are blow-ups of smooth nonhyperelliptic curves of degree six and genus three. We denote their exceptional divisors by E,E′E,E'. The standard determinantal description gives a smooth plane quartic C={det(z0M1+z1M2+z2M3)=0}⊂ℙ2,X={x𝗍Miy=0:1≤i≤3}.C=\{\det(z_0M_1+z_1M_2+z_2M_3)=0\}\subset\mathbb P^2, \qquad X=\{x^{\mathsf t}M_i y=0:1\le i\le3\}. In particular, every matrix on CC has rank three. These geometric facts hold for every smooth member; see [2, Proposition 2.1].

Lemma 32.1 (Intersection numbers and anticanonical sections). One has L=−KX=H+H′,E=3H−H′,E′=3H′−H,H3=(H′)3=1,H2H′=H(H′)2=3.\begin{gathered} L=-K_X=H+H',\quad E=3H-H',\quad E'=3H'-H,\\ H^3=(H')^3=1,\qquad H^2H'=H(H')^2=3. \end{gathered} so L3=20L^3=20. For m≥0m\ge0, the space H0(X,mL)H^0(X,mL) is the bidegree (m,m)(m,m) part of R=ℂ[x0,…,x3,y0,…,y3]/(F1,F2,F3),Fi=x𝗍Miy.R=\mathbb C[x_0,\ldots,x_3,y_0,\ldots,y_3]/(F_1,F_2,F_3), \qquad F_i=x^{\mathsf t}M_i y. Its dimension is (32.1)Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)3=103m3+5m2+113m+1.\label{f212:eq:Nm} N_m=\frac{(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)}3 =\frac{10}3m^3+5m^2+\frac{11}3m+1.

Proof. Adjunction gives L=H+H′L=H+H'. The two blow-up canonical formulas give 4H−E=L=4H′−E′4H-E=L=4H'-E'. In the ambient product, [X]=(H+H′)3[X]=(H+H')^3; multiplication gives the four intersection numbers. The Koszul resolution of the three bilinear equations, twisted by (m,m)(m,m), identifies the displayed quotient with global sections. Indeed, the terms have bidegrees (m−r,m−r)(m-r,m-r), 0≤r≤30\le r\le3. A negative entry occurring here belongs to {−1,−2,−3}\{-1,-2,-3\}, for which all cohomology on ℙ3\mathbb P^3 vanishes. Nonnegative entries have no higher cohomology. Consequently Nm=∑r=03(−1)r(3r)(m−r+33)2,N_m=\sum_{r=0}^3(-1)^r\binom3r\binom{m-r+3}{3}^{\!2}, where a summand with m<rm<r is zero. Expanding proves (32.1). ◻

We use the following published reduction explicitly as an external input.

Proposition 32.2 (Cheltsov–Li–Ma’u–Pinardin). If a prime divisor FF over XX satisfies βX(F)≤0\beta_X(F)\le0, then its centre on XX is a closed point of E∩E′E\cap E'.

This is [1, Theorem A]. Thus it suffices to prove strict beta positivity for every divisor centred at every point of E∩E′E\cap E'. No group action is imposed. Nor do we assume that EE and E′E' meet transversally.