Text size

Section 35

Three cases on the ordinary exceptional plane

Lemma 35.1 (Both mixed coefficients: the first moment certificate). Let t,a,bt,a,b be coordinates on the exceptional plane, and suppose the actual ordinary-point refinement is the diagonal subalgebra generated, in bidegrees (1,0)(1,0) and (0,1)(0,1), by 1,t,a,Q2and1,t,b,Q3,1,t,a,Q_2\qquad\text{and}\qquad 1,t,b,Q_3, respectively. Here ordinary order is polynomial degree in t,a,bt,a,b. Suppose, after triangular changes preserving the lexicographic order a>b>ta>b>t, that Q2=ab+κt2,Q3=Q2+t(αa+βb+γt),αβ≠0.Q_2=ab+\kappa t^2,\qquad Q_3=Q_2+t(\alpha a+\beta b+\gamma t),\qquad \alpha\beta\ne0. Suppose its diagonal Hilbert function is Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)/3N_m=(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)/3. Then the asymptotic mean exponents of the lexicographic initial monomials, normalized by mNmmN_m, are (μt,μa,μb)=(710,253320,243320).(\mu_t,\mu_a,\mu_b) =\left(\frac7{10},\frac{253}{320},\frac{243}{320}\right).

Proof. The degree-one diagonal space contains 1,t,a,b,t2,ta,tb,ab,tQ2,bQ2,aQ3,Q2Q3,D:=t(Q3−Q2).1,t,a,b,t^2,ta,tb,ab,tQ_2,bQ_2,aQ_3,Q_2Q_3, D:=t(Q_3-Q_2). Their leading exponents, in coordinate order (t,a,b)(t,a,b), are the thirteen vectors p0,…,p12p_0,\ldots,p_{12} below; each occurs once. Put R=βb2+γbt−ακt2R=\beta b^2+\gamma bt-\alpha\kappa t^2. The following degree-two sections give two more certified leading monomials: G5=(tb)D−αt2(tQ2)=t3R,in(G5)=βt3b2,H6=D(bQ2+αtQ2)−αt2(Q2Q3)=t2Q2R,in(H6)=βt2ab3.\begin{aligned} G_5&=(tb)D-\alpha t^2(tQ_2)=t^3R, &\operatorname{in}(G_5)&=\beta t^3b^2,\\ H_6&=D(bQ_2+\alpha tQ_2)-\alpha t^2(Q_2Q_3)=t^2Q_2R, &\operatorname{in}(H_6)&=\beta t^2ab^3. \end{aligned} Take the convex hull PP of the following normalized vectors (the last two are divided by degree two): i01234567891011121314t000000011112213/2a00111220011011/20b01012120101003/21\begin{array}{c|rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr} i&0&1&2&3&4&5&6&7&8&9&10&11&12&13&14\\\hline t&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&1&1&1&1&2&2&1&3/2\\ a&0&0&1&1&1&2&2&0&0&1&1&0&1&1/2&0\\ b&0&1&0&1&2&1&2&0&1&0&1&0&0&3/2&1 \end{array} An exact facet description is t,a,b≥0,|a−b|≤1,t+2a≤4,2t+b≤4,t+2b≤4,5t+2a+4b≤12,4t+a+3b≤9.\begin{gathered} t,a,b\ge0,\qquad |a-b|\le1,\\ t+2a\le4,\quad 2t+b\le4,\quad t+2b\le4,\\ 5t+2a+4b\le12,\qquad4t+a+3b\le9. \end{gathered} For a reproducible rational integration certificate, take c=(1/2,1/2,1/2)c=(1/2,1/2,1/2) and cone the following boundary triangles to cc: (i,j,k)vol[c,pi,pj,pk](i,j,k)vol[c,pi,pj,pk](12,2,5)1/3(12,6,5)5/12(14,12,11)5/24(13,6,4)5/24(13,12,6)13/24(13,14,12)5/24(1,2,0)1/12(1,6,5)1/6(1,6,4)1/12(1,2,5)1/6(12,2,0)1/6(12,11,0)1/6(14,1,0)1/8(14,11,0)1/6(13,1,4)1/6(13,14,1)1/8\begin{array}{c|rc|r} (i,j,k)&\operatorname{vol}[c,p_i,p_j,p_k] &(i,j,k)&\operatorname{vol}[c,p_i,p_j,p_k]\\\hline (12,2,5)&1/3 &(12,6,5)&5/12\\ (14,12,11)&5/24 &(13,6,4)&5/24\\ (13,12,6)&13/24 &(13,14,12)&5/24\\ (1,2,0)&1/12 &(1,6,5)&1/6\\ (1,6,4)&1/12 &(1,2,5)&1/6\\ (12,2,0)&1/6 &(12,11,0)&1/6\\ (14,1,0)&1/8 &(14,11,0)&1/6\\ (13,1,4)&1/6 &(13,14,1)&1/8 \end{array} Each tetrahedron has moment equal to its volume times (c+pi+pj+pk)/4(c+p_i+p_j+p_k)/4. Summation gives vol(P)=103,∫P(t,a,b)dV=(73,25396,8132).\operatorname{vol}(P)=\frac{10}{3},\qquad \int_P(t,a,b)\,dV=\left(\frac73,\frac{253}{96},\frac{81}{32}\right). The semigroup generated by these fifteen certified monomials has full lattice: it contains (1,0,0,0)(1,0,0,0) and its translates by each coordinate unit vector. Consequently its degree-mm cardinality is vol(P)m3+O(m2)\operatorname{vol}(P)m^3+O(m^2) and its exponent sums have leading term m4∫P(t,a,b)dVm^4\int_P(t,a,b)\,dV. These conclusions follow either from the conductor of an affine semigroup in its saturation or from lattice-point counting. The full initial space has dimension Nm=(10/3)m3+O(m2)N_m=(10/3)m^3+O(m^2), so at most O(m2)O(m^2) initial monomials are missing from this generated semigroup. All exponents are bounded by 4m4m because the original generators have ordinary degree at most two in each factor. Their contribution to exponent sums is therefore O(m3)O(m^3). This proves the asserted asymptotic means without asserting a complete SAGBI basis. ◻

Coefficient criterion.

For Q2=At2+Bta+Ctb+DabQ_2=At^2+Bta+Ctb+Dab and Q3=A′t2+B′ta+C′tb+D′abQ_3=A't^2+B'ta+C'tb+D'ab, the explicit open conditions are DD′(DB′−D′B)(DC′−D′C)≠0.DD'(DB'-D'B)(DC'-D'C)\ne0. Divide the quadrics by D,D′D,D' and make the triangular changes a↦a+(C/D)ta\mapsto a+(C/D)t, b↦b+(B/D)tb\mapsto b+(B/D)t. The coefficients α,β\alpha,\beta are B′/D′−B/DB'/D'-B/D and C′/D′−C/DC'/D'-C/D; their nonvanishing gives the certificate. For example Q2=ab+t2Q_2=ab+t^2 and Q3=ab+ta+tb+2t2Q_3=ab+ta+tb+2t^2 satisfy it. The corresponding bihomogeneous q2,q3q_2,q_3 are coprime: if κ≠0\kappa\ne0, q2q_2 is irreducible and the nonzero mixed coefficients exclude proportionality; if κ=0\kappa=0, neither factor of q2=x3y3q_2=x_3y_3 divides q3q_3. Thus the separate initial-domain argument applies.

Threshold consequence.

Applying Lemma 34.1 to the certified body gives δ(ℙ2;W)≥min{μt−1,μa−1,μb−1}=320253.\delta(\mathbb P^2;W)\ge \min\{\mu_t^{-1},\mu_a^{-1},\mu_b^{-1}\} =\frac{320}{253}. Together with the independently proved SX(G)=9/4S_X(G)=9/4, AX(G)=3A_X(G)=3, and all hypotheses of the point-extraction refinement theorem, this gives δp(X)≥min{4/3,320/253}=320/253>1\delta_p(X)\ge\min\{4/3,320/253\}=320/253>1.

Corollary 35.2 (All strata with both abab coefficients nonzero). Suppose the actual ordinary-point refinement has the form in the first lemma, and the bihomogeneous q2,q3q_2,q_3 are coprime. If the abab coefficients of both Q2,Q3Q_2,Q_3 are nonzero, then δ(ℙ2;W)≥320253.\delta(\mathbb P^2;W)\ge\frac{320}{253}.

Proof. Normalize as before, obtaining Q2=ab+κt2Q_2=ab+\kappa t^2, Q3=Q2+t(αa+βb+γt)Q_3=Q_2+t(\alpha a+\beta b+\gamma t). The case αβ≠0\alpha\beta\ne0 is proved above. If exactly one of α,β\alpha,\beta is nonzero, exchange the projection labels and the coordinates a,ba,b if necessary, and perform the triangular normalization again, so that α≠0\alpha\ne0, β=0\beta=0.

Retain the thirteen degree-one monomials of the first lemma, and use its same explicit sections G5,H6G_5,H_6. Now R=γbt−ακt2R=\gamma bt-\alpha\kappa t^2. If γ≠0\gamma\ne0, their leading exponents are (4,0,1)(4,0,1) and (3,1,2)(3,1,2). If γ=0\gamma=0, coprimality forces κ≠0\kappa\ne0: otherwise the bihomogeneous q2,q3q_2,q_3 share their x3x_3 factor. In this case their leading exponents are (5,0,0)(5,0,0) and (4,1,1)(4,1,1).

Finally, if α=β=0\alpha=\beta=0, coprimality forces γ≠0\gamma\ne0. Then D=γt3D=\gamma t^3 replaces the pivot at2at^2 by t3t^3; no degree-two pivots are needed. Exact rational triangulation gives the following volumes and centroids; the degree-two exponents in the middle column are divided by two when taking convex hulls. conditionadditional exponentsvol(P)(μt,μa,μb)αβ≠0(3,0,2),(2,1,3)10/3(7/10,253/320,243/320)α≠0,β=0,γ≠0(4,0,1),(3,1,2)10/3(231/320,253/320,59/80)α≠0,β=γ=0,κ≠0(5,0,0),(4,1,1)10/3(119/160,253/320,229/320)α=β=0,γ≠0at2 replaced by t310/3(31/40,59/80,59/80)\begin{array}{c|c|c|c} \text{condition}&\text{additional exponents} &\operatorname{vol}(P)&(\mu_t,\mu_a,\mu_b)\\\hline \alpha\beta\ne0 &(3,0,2),(2,1,3)&10/3 &(7/10,253/320,243/320)\\ \alpha\ne0,\ \beta=0,\ \gamma\ne0 &(4,0,1),(3,1,2)&10/3 &(231/320,253/320,59/80)\\ \alpha\ne0,\ \beta=\gamma=0,\ \kappa\ne0 &(5,0,0),(4,1,1)&10/3 &(119/160,253/320,229/320)\\ \alpha=\beta=0,\ \gamma\ne0 &at^2\text{ replaced by }t^3&10/3 &(31/40,59/80,59/80) \end{array} The vertices are the displayed thirteen degree-one vectors, with the two additional exponents divided by two in the first three rows. In the last row replace (2,1,0)(2,1,0) by (3,0,0)(3,0,0). Formula (34.1) computes each entry by coning the boundary facets; additional facet certificates are recorded just below. The same full-lattice and Hilbert-mass argument proves that these are the actual asymptotic lexicographic moments. Every displayed coordinate is at most 253/320253/320, and the monomial-degeneration lemma applies. ◻

For α≠0,β=0,γ≠0\alpha\ne0,\ \beta=0,\ \gamma\ne0, the non-coordinate facets are −a+b≤1,a−b≤1,t−a+2b≤3,t≤2,t+2a≤4,2t+3b≤6,3t+a+2b≤7,4t+2a+3b≤10.\begin{gathered} -a+b\le 1,\quad a-b\le 1,\quad t-a+2b\le 3,\quad t\le 2,\\ t+2a\le 4,\quad 2t+3b\le 6,\quad 3t+a+2b\le 7,\quad 4t+2a+3b\le 10 . \end{gathered} For α≠0,β=γ=0\alpha\ne0,\ \beta=\gamma=0, the non-coordinate facets are −a+b≤1,a−b≤1,t+2a≤4,2t−a+3b≤5,2t+a+b≤5,3t+4b≤8,3t+2a+2b≤8.\begin{gathered} -a+b\le 1,\quad a-b\le 1,\quad t+2a\le 4,\quad 2t-a+3b\le 5,\\ 2t+a+b\le 5,\quad 3t+4b\le 8,\quad 3t+2a+2b\le 8 . \end{gathered} For α=β=0,γ≠0\alpha=\beta=0,\ \gamma\ne0, the non-coordinate facets are −a+b≤1,a−b≤1,t−a+2b≤3,t+2a−b≤3,2t+3b≤6,2t+3a≤6.\begin{gathered} -a+b\le 1,\quad a-b\le 1,\quad t-a+2b\le 3,\quad t+2a-b\le 3,\\ 2t+3b\le 6,\quad 2t+3a\le 6 . \end{gathered}

Lemma 35.3 (One vanishing mixed coefficient). Assume that the actual ordinary-point refinement has homogeneous pieces spanned by trasbhQ2iQ3k,s+i≤m,h+k≤m,r+s+h+i+k≤2m,t^ra^sb^hQ_2^iQ_3^k, \qquad s+i\le m,\quad h+k\le m,\quad r+s+h+i+k\le2m, where Q2=ab+κt2,Q3=t(a+Cb+γt),(C,γ,κ)≠(0,0,0).Q_2=ab+\kappa t^2,\qquad Q_3=t(a+Cb+\gamma t), \qquad (C,\gamma,\kappa)\ne(0,0,0). Assume its total degree-mm dimension is Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)/3N_m=(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)/3. With lexicographic order a>b>ta>b>t, the asymptotic mean exponents are conditionμtμaμbmaxμiC≠013/16253/320207/32013/16C=0,γ≠0267/320253/3205/8267/320C=γ=0,κ≠0137/160253/320193/320137/160.\begin{array}{c|ccc|c} \text{condition}&\mu_t&\mu_a&\mu_b&\max\mu_i\\\hline C\ne0&13/16&253/320&207/320&13/16\\ C=0,\ \gamma\ne0&267/320&253/320&5/8&267/320\\ C=\gamma=0,\ \kappa\ne0&137/160&253/320&193/320&137/160. \end{array} Consequently the monomial degeneration lemma gives δ(ℙ2;W)≥160/137>1\delta(\mathbb P^2;W)\ge160/137>1 uniformly in these cases.

Proof. Thirteen degree-one diagonal sections are 1,t,a,b,t2,ta,tb,ab,tQ2,bQ2,aQ3,Q2Q3,D:=tQ3.1,t,a,b,t^2,ta,tb,ab,tQ_2,bQ_2,aQ_3,Q_2Q_3,D:=tQ_3. Their leading exponents are distinct. In coordinate order (t,a,b)(t,a,b), the sorted list is p0,…,p12=((0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(0,1,2),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(1,2,0),(1,2,1),(2,0,0),(2,1,0)).\begin{aligned} p_0,\ldots,p_{12}=\big(& (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1), (0,1,2),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),\\ &(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(1,2,0),(1,2,1),(2,0,0),(2,1,0)\big). \end{aligned} Set R=Cb2+γbt−κt2R=Cb^2+\gamma bt-\kappa t^2. Two degree-two diagonal sections are certified by the polynomial identities G=(tb)D−t2(tQ2)=t3R,J=(bQ2)D−(tQ2)2=t2Q2R.\begin{aligned} G&=(tb)D-t^2(tQ_2)=t^3R,\\ J&=(bQ_2)D-(tQ_2)^2=t^2Q_2R. \end{aligned} Their leading exponents, divided by degree two, are as follows: conditionp13=12expin(G)p14=12expin(J)C≠0(3/2,0,1)(1,1/2,3/2)C=0,γ≠0(2,0,1/2)(3/2,1/2,1)C=γ=0,κ≠0(5/2,0,0)(2,1/2,1/2).\begin{array}{c|cc} \text{condition}&p_{13}=\tfrac12\exp\operatorname{in}(G) &p_{14}=\tfrac12\exp\operatorname{in}(J)\\\hline C\ne0&(3/2,0,1)&(1,1/2,3/2)\\ C=0,\ \gamma\ne0&(2,0,1/2)&(3/2,1/2,1)\\ C=\gamma=0,\ \kappa\ne0&(5/2,0,0)&(2,1/2,1/2). \end{array} Let PP be the convex hull of p0,…,p14p_0,\ldots,p_{14}. For completeness, all three polytopes have the common inequalities t,a,b≥0,a−t≤1,b−a≤1,t+a≤3.t,a,b\ge0,\qquad a-t\le1,\qquad b-a\le1,\qquad t+a\le3. Their additional facet inequalities are respectively C≠02t+b≤4,2t+a+3b≤7,4t+a+3b≤9;C=0,γ≠0t−a+2b≤3,t≤2,3t+a+2b≤7,3t+a+4b≤9;C=γ=0,κ≠02t−a+3b≤5,2t+a+b≤5,4t+a+5b≤11.\begin{array}{c|l} C\ne0&2t+b\le4,\quad 2t+a+3b\le7,\quad4t+a+3b\le9;\\ C=0,\gamma\ne0&t-a+2b\le3,\quad t\le2,\quad3t+a+2b\le7, \quad3t+a+4b\le9;\\ C=\gamma=0,\kappa\ne0&2t-a+3b\le5,\quad2t+a+b\le5, \quad4t+a+5b\le11. \end{array} Exact integration gives conditionvol(P)∫Pt∫Pa∫PbC≠010/365/24253/9669/32C=0,γ≠010/389/32253/9625/12C=γ=0,κ≠010/3137/48253/96193/96.\begin{array}{c|c|ccc} \text{condition}&\operatorname{vol}(P)&\int_Pt&\int_Pa&\int_Pb\\\hline C\ne0&10/3&65/24&253/96&69/32\\ C=0,\gamma\ne0&10/3&89/32&253/96&25/12\\ C=\gamma=0,\kappa\ne0&10/3&137/48&253/96&193/96. \end{array} The facets supply a rational integration certificate. Alternatively, cone each facet triangulation to (1/2,1/2,1/2)(1/2,1/2,1/2) and use vol[c,pi,pj,pk]=|det(pi−c,pj−c,pk−c)|/6\operatorname{vol}[c,p_i,p_j,p_k]= |\det(p_i-c,p_j-c,p_k-c)|/6; the first moment of this tetrahedron is its volume times (c+pi+pj+pk)/4(c+p_i+p_j+p_k)/4.

The generated affine semigroup has full lattice, since the degree-one list includes the origin and all three coordinate unit vectors. Its degree-mm cardinality is therefore (10/3)m3+O(m2)(10/3)m^3+O(m^2), and its exponent sums have leading term m4∫P(t,a,b)m^4\int_P(t,a,b). All these semigroup elements occur as leading monomials of products of the fifteen displayed sections. The full initial space has the same leading Hilbert coefficient, Nm=(10/3)m3+O(m2)N_m=(10/3)m^3+O(m^2), so there are only O(m2)O(m^2) additional leading monomials. Every exponent is bounded by 4m4m, and consequently these extra monomials contribute only O(m3)O(m^3) to exponent sums. Dividing the displayed moments by 10/310/3 proves the asserted means. The stated threshold follows from the independently justified monomial degeneration lemma. ◻

Lemma 35.4 (Independent tangent quadrics). Assume that the actual ordinary-point refinement has homogeneous pieces spanned by trasbhQ2iQ3k,s+i≤m,h+k≤m,r+s+h+i+k≤2m,t^ra^sb^hQ_2^iQ_3^k, \qquad s+i\le m,\quad h+k\le m,\quad r+s+h+i+k\le2m, where Q2=t(βa+b),Q3=t(a+γb),βγ≠1.Q_2=t(\beta a+b),\qquad Q_3=t(a+\gamma b),\qquad\beta\gamma\ne1. Assume its total degree-mm dimension is Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)/3N_m=(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)/3. With lexicographic order a>b>ta>b>t, the asymptotic mean exponents are (μt,μa,μb)={(1,53/80,47/80),β≠0,(1,5/8,5/8),β=0.(\mu_t,\mu_a,\mu_b)= \begin{cases} (1,53/80,47/80),&\beta\ne0,\\ (1,5/8,5/8),&\beta=0. \end{cases} In particular the monomial degeneration lemma yields δ(ℙ2;W)≥1\delta(\mathbb P^2;W)\ge1.

Proof. Put U=βa+bU=\beta a+b, V=a+γbV=a+\gamma b, P=bUP=bU, and R=aVR=aV. The binary quadrics PP and RR are coprime: neither aa divides PP nor bb divides RR, and the remaining factors U,VU,V are independent precisely when βγ≠1\beta\gamma\ne1.

Since tQ2,tQ3tQ_2,tQ_3 are degree-one diagonal sections, their span contains t2a,t2bt^2a,t^2b. If β≠0\beta\ne0, thirteen degree-one pivot exponents are p0,…,p12=((0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(1,2,0),(2,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,1,0),(2,2,0)).\begin{aligned} p_0,\ldots,p_{12}=\big(& (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1), (1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),\\ &(1,1,1),(1,2,0),(2,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,1,0),(2,2,0)\big). \end{aligned} They come from 1,a,b,ab,t,ta,tb,t2,t2a,t2b,bQ2,aQ3,Q2Q31,a,b,ab,t,ta,tb,t^2,t^2a,t^2b,bQ_2,aQ_3,Q_2Q_3.

We next certify an entire sequence of sections rather than assume that a finite list forms a SAGBI basis. For every m≥1m\ge1, the degree-mm diagonal space contains tm⟨a,b⟩Symm−1⟨P,R⟩.t^m\,\langle a,b\rangle\operatorname{Sym}^{m-1}\langle P,R\rangle. Indeed, for 0≤q≤m−10\le q\le m-1, the section tmaRm−1−qPqt^m aR^{m-1-q}P^q has (r,s,h,i,k)=(1,m−q,q,q,m−1−q),(r,s,h,i,k)=(1,m-q,q,q,m-1-q), and the analogous section with bb has (r,s,h,i,k)=(1,m−1−q,q+1,q,m−1−q).(r,s,h,i,k)=(1,m-1-q,q+1,q,m-1-q). Both satisfy the defining inequalities.

These 2m2m binary forms are linearly independent. To see this, set z=a/bz=a/b. The rational map z↦R/Pz\mapsto R/P has degree two because R,PR,P are coprime binary quadrics, so [ℂ(z):ℂ(R/P)]=2[\mathbb C(z):\mathbb C(R/P)]=2. A linear dependence between aRm−1−qPqaR^{m-1-q}P^q and bRm−1−qPqbR^{m-1-q}P^q, after dividing by bPm−1bP^{m-1}, would give zA(R/P)+B(R/P)=0zA(R/P)+B(R/P)=0. This forces A=B=0A=B=0. Thus the displayed subspace is all binary forms of degree 2m−12m-1. In particular, tmb2m−1∈Wmfor every m≥1.t^m b^{2m-1}\in W_m \qquad\text{for every }m\ge1. Its normalized exponent tends to p13=(1,0,2)p_{13}=(1,0,2).

Let P∞=conv{p0,…,p13}P_\infty=\operatorname{conv}\{p_0,\ldots,p_{13}\}. An exact facet description is 0≤t≤2,a,b≥0,a−t≤1,b−t≤1,a+b≤2,2t+a+2b≤6.0\le t\le2,\quad a,b\ge0,\quad a-t\le1,\quad b-t\le1, \quad a+b\le2,\quad2t+a+2b\le6. Direct rational integration gives vol(P∞)=10/3,∫P∞(t,a,b)dV=(10/3,53/24,47/24).\operatorname{vol}(P_\infty)=10/3,\qquad \int_{P_\infty}(t,a,b)\,dV=(10/3,53/24,47/24).

Here is a precise volume argument allowing the limit point. For fixed MM, use the thirteen degree-one sections and the certified section tMb2M−1t^Mb^{2M-1}. Their finitely generated semigroup has full lattice, and its body is PM=conv{p0,…,p12,(1,0,2−1/M)}.P_M=\operatorname{conv}\{p_0,\ldots,p_{12},(1,0,2-1/M)\}. The bodies PMP_M increase to P∞P_\infty up to closure. The degree-mm semigroup cardinality is vol(PM)m3+OM(m2)\operatorname{vol}(P_M)m^3+O_M(m^2), and its exponent sums have leading term m4∫PM(t,a,b)m^4\int_{P_M}(t,a,b). The full initial space has cardinality (10/3)m3+O(m2)(10/3)m^3+O(m^2). Since every exponent is at most 4m4m, the difference between its exponent sums after division by m4m^4 and those of the fixed semigroup is at most 4(10/3−vol(PM))+oM(1)4(10/3-\operatorname{vol}(P_M))+o_M(1) in each coordinate. First let mm tend to infinity and then let MM tend to infinity. This proves existence of the full asymptotic means and gives (1,53/80,47/80)(1,53/80,47/80).

If β=0\beta=0, the thirteen degree-one pivot exponents instead are ((0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,0,2),(1,1,0),(1,2,0),(2,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,1,0),(2,1,1)).\begin{aligned} \big(& (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,0), (1,0,1),(1,0,2),\\ &(1,1,0),(1,2,0),(2,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,1,0),(2,1,1)\big). \end{aligned} Their convex hull already has volume 10/310/3, with moments (10/3,25/12,25/12)(10/3,25/12,25/12). Its facets are 0≤t≤2,a,b≥0,a−t≤1,b−t≤1,a+b≤2,t+a≤3,t+b≤3.0\le t\le2,\quad a,b\ge0,\quad a-t\le1,\quad b-t\le1, \quad a+b\le2,\quad t+a\le3,\quad t+b\le3. The ordinary finite-semigroup volume argument proves the second row. This includes β=γ=0\beta=\gamma=0 without any additional argument. ◻