Section 24
Three volume integrals and the reduced-fibre flags
Lemma 24.1. The nef cone is generated by , the effective cone is generated by , and Every prime divisor on has positive beta invariant.
Proof. A fibre of and a general conic fibre test the two boundaries of the nef cone. For a prime divisor , write , with integers and . A general smooth cubic section as in Lemma 23.4 is not a component of . Intersect its effective restriction with the nef conic class to obtain . Thus has nonnegative integral coefficients. Since , this also proves the assertion about the effective cone.
For , the three nef divisors in the calculation have volumes The first and third volumes vanish for . For , , with fixed part and volume ; beyond two the volume is zero. The fixed-part assertion follows by testing a general fibre of , or from for . Hence the three integrals, divided by , are If , either or is effective, by the integral expression above. Monotonicity of volume gives . The calculation for gives the remaining assertion. ◻
Fix a smooth cubic from Lemma 23.4. For , its refined series has the following moving and fixed parts: (24.1) These are asymptotically complete. In the first open interval this follows from ampleness and Serre vanishing. In the second, remove the fixed multiple of and restrict the complete series on to its hyperplane section. Endpoint errors disappear in the limits.
For a smooth rational curve different from , write for its surface Zariski decomposition and put . With , the flag constants are (24.2) The inner integral runs to the pseudo-effective threshold. The normalization is . The proof of Lemma 12.1, with , gives (24.3) Only decompositions on the cubic surface and the elementary fixed part on are used here.
Lemma 24.2 (The smooth-conic calculation). If is a smooth conic fibre and , put . Then In particular, if , then .
Proof. For , put . The decomposition is For , scale the decomposition by . Nefness, orthogonality and the threshold follow exactly as in Lemma 12.2: both and are nef. The three inner integrals on the first interval are , , and , for , , and , respectively. On the second interval they are , , and . Since , these give The original fixed part contributes Adding the last two fixed contributions gives . If , then , and (24.3) proves the assertion. ◻
Lemma 24.3 (The reducible-conic calculation). Suppose the conic fibre is reduced and singular, and the smooth cubic of Lemma 23.4 is available. Then at every point of that fibre.
Proof. Write the fibre as , choosing . The two curves have square and meet transversely once. For , set . The positive and negative parts of are The threshold is . The classes are conic pencils and are nef, so the displayed decomposition has the required properties. For , is nef up to its threshold , where .
Put if and zero otherwise, and . The inner integrals in the first interval are , , and . In the second they are , , and zero. Consequently The final term uses the same fixed-part integral as in Lemma 24.2. Apply (24.3). ◻
Example 24.4 (Why the point term must be retained). If a smooth conic is transverse to at , the flag gives . If it is tangent, it gives . Thus the cubic-surface flag alone gives no strict local threshold at these points of . A lower bound does not indicate instability; it indicates the limitation of this flag.