Text size

Section 54

Extracting a double conic fibre

Fix a nonreduced fibre g−1(y)=2Λg^{-1}(y)=2\Lambda, and choose y=[1:0:0]y=[1:0:0]. Its reduced curve has HΛ=1H\Lambda=1. It is not contained in EE: a curve in EE either has HH-degree zero or maps onto the conic CC and has even positive HH-degree. Thus π\pi maps Λ\Lambda to a line in VV. Also EΛ=1E\Lambda=1; its intersection with EE is one reduced point, denoted by qq.

Lemma 54.1 (The leading equations). There are coordinates as in Lemma 53.4, with u=y1u=y_1, v=y2v=y_2, in which the following holds. Set t=ey0t=e y_0. The line Λ\Lambda has coordinates [s:t][s:t], and qq is t=0t=0. Give (s,x,z,e,y0,u,v)(s,x,z,e,y_0,u,v) respective weights (0,1,2,0,0,2,2)(0,1,2,0,0,2,2). Then the lowest-weight parts of the two equations are (54.1)F1,0=zy0−R(s,t;u,v),F2,0=x2+sz+eT(s,t;u,v),\label{f216:eq:initial-equations} F_{1,0}=z y_0-R(s,t;u,v),\qquad F_{2,0}=x^2+s z+e T(s,t;u,v), where R=A(s,t)u+B(s,t)vR=A(s,t)u+B(s,t)v and T=M(s,t)u+N(s,t)vT=M(s,t)u+N(s,t)v, with A,B,M,NA,B,M,N linear forms. The binary quadrics q1,q2q_1,q_2 defined by q(s,t;u,v)=sR+tT=q1(s,t)u+q2(s,t)vq(s,t;u,v)=sR+tT=q_1(s,t)u+q_2(s,t)v have no common zero. Consequently, on ℙ[s:t]1×ℙ[u:v]1\mathbb P^1_{[s:t]}\times\mathbb P^1_{[u:v]} the curve D=(q=0)D=(q=0) is a smooth (2,1)(2,1)-curve, and P=(t=R=0)P=(t=R=0) is a single reduced point on DD.

Proof. The fibre plane is cut out by F1|yF_1|_y, a nonzero linear form in the four fibre coordinates of TT. Its intersection with e=0e=0 is tangent to the smooth conic CC: restricting the double-line equation to that line gives twice the point qq. Choose coordinates on Π\Pi so that C=(x2+sz=0)C=(x^2+s z=0), q=[1:0:0]q=[1:0:0], and its tangent line is z=0z=0. The fibre-plane equation is therefore a nonzero multiple of z+cey0z+c e y_0. Replace zz by z+cey0z+c e y_0. On this plane the other quadric is a square; replacing xx by x+dey0x+d e y_0 and scaling its equation makes this square x2x^2. A further replacement of ss by s+c′ey0s+c' e y_0 absorbs the remaining ey0ze y_0 z term. These changes preserve Π\Pi, its conic, and the two divisor gradings.

The remaining terms of F1F_1 contain uu or vv; its terms of weight two are linear in s,ts,t times u,vu,v. The remaining terms of F2F_2, after x2+szx^2+s z, contain eue u or eve v, and their weight-two terms are ee times a linear form in s,ts,t times u,vu,v. This gives (54.1). On y0=1y_0=1, eliminate zz. The first transverse terms along Λ\Lambda are x2+q1(s,t)u+q2(s,t)vx^2+q_1(s,t)u+q_2(s,t)v. If q1,q2q_1,q_2 vanished simultaneously, the total space XX would be singular at the corresponding point. Thus they define a degree-two morphism ℙ1→ℙ1\mathbb P^1\to\mathbb P^1, whose graph is DD. At t=0t=0 one has q=sRq=sR, so R(1,0;u,v)R(1,0;u,v) is a nonzero linear form. The equations t=R=0t=R=0 cut out one reduced point, and the same identity shows that it belongs to DD. ◻

Lemma 54.2 (The extraction and the different). Let 𝒥=𝔪y𝒪X\mathcal J=\mathfrak m_y\mathcal O_X and ω:X♯=Bl𝒥X→X\omega\colon X^\sharp=\mathop{\mathrm{Bl}}_{\mathcal J}X\to X. Its reduced exceptional divisor FF is of plt type. With h=𝒪F(1,0)h=\mathcal O_F(1,0) and f=𝒪F(0,1)f=\mathcal O_F(0,1), one has F≅Λ×ℙ1,AX(F)=3,ω*L|F=h,2F|F=−f,ΔF=12D.F\cong\Lambda\times\mathbb P^1,\qquad A_X(F)=3,\qquad \omega^*L|_F=h,\qquad 2F|_F=-f,\qquad \Delta_F=\frac12D.

Proof. Where q1q_1 is nonzero, eliminate uu in the local equation. Then 𝒥=(x2,v)\mathcal J=(x^2,v), and its blow-up is the transverse weighted blow-up of weights (1,2)(1,2). Its charts are v=x2rv=x^2r and x2=vrx^2=vr. The second chart is an A1A_1 surface singularity times the smooth curve direction, so the blow-up is normal. Since gg is flat, blowing up the fibre ideal is base change from Blyℙ2\mathop{\mathrm{Bl}}_y\mathbb P^2. Its exceptional scheme is (2Λ)×ℙ1(2\Lambda)\times\mathbb P^1, proving the product description and the identity 2F|F=−f2F|_F=-f. The formula for L|FL|_F follows from LΛ=1L\Lambda=1.

On the smooth chart, dx∧dv=x2dx∧drdx\wedge dv=x^2dx\wedge dr, giving discrepancy three. On the other chart the index cover for FF is x=abx=ab, v=a2v=a^2, r=b2r=b^2, modulo (a,b)↦(−a,−b)(a,b)\mapsto(-a,-b). Adjunction gives coefficient 1/21/2 on its singular-locus curve; Lemma 54.1 identifies that curve with DD. The quotient description also proves that (X♯,F)(X^\sharp,F) is plt. Finally, −2F-2F is the relatively ample tautological divisor of the blow-up. These facts verify all the extraction hypotheses. ◻

Lemma 54.3 (Exactness of the initial algebra). The associated graded ring of the section ring in Lemma 53.4, for the divisorial filtration ordF\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_F, is (54.2)R0=ℂ[s,x,z,e,y0,u,v](zy0−R(s,ey0;u,v),x2+sz+eT(s,ey0;u,v)).\label{f216:eq:initial-ring} R_0=\frac{\mathbb C[s,x,z,e,y_0,u,v]} {(z y_0-R(s,e y_0;u,v),\ x^2+s z+eT(s,e y_0;u,v))}. This is a prime complete intersection. In particular, the displayed initial forms account for cancellations of global sections.

Proof. On y0≠0y_0\ne0, eliminate zz and put t=ey0t=e y_0. The remaining equation is y0x2+q1(s,t)u+q2(s,t)v=0.y_0x^2+q_1(s,t)u+q_2(s,t)v=0. It is irreducible. Indeed, it is a primitive linear polynomial in u,vu,v over ℂ[s,t,y0±1,x]\mathbb C[s,t,y_0^{\pm1},x], since q1,q2q_1,q_2 are coprime. Thus this open set is integral of dimension five.

On the boundary y0=0y_0=0, write R(s,0;u,v)=s(au+bv)R(s,0;u,v)=s(au+bv) and T(s,0;u,v)=s(cu+dv)T(s,0;u,v)=s(cu+dv). Here (a,b)≠(0,0)(a,b)\ne(0,0). The two equations become s(au+bv)=0,x2+sz+es(cu+dv)=0.s(au+bv)=0,\qquad x^2+s z+es(cu+dv)=0. On s≠0s\ne0 they cut out a four-dimensional set. On s=0s=0 one has x=0x=0, and the four variables z,e,u,vz,e,u,v remain. Therefore the boundary has dimension four. The two equations have height two, so their quotient is Cohen–Macaulay and unmixed. No component is contained in the boundary; the integral open set has only one component and is generically reduced. Unmixedness now proves that R0R_0 is a domain.

The displayed ideal is contained in the weight initial ideal of (F1,F2)(F_1,F_2). The original quotient and the displayed candidate quotient are complete intersections of bidegrees (1,1)(1,1) and (2,0)(2,0). The weight initial quotient has the same bigraded Hilbert function as the original quotient, so the candidate and initial quotients have equal Hilbert functions. Each piece is finite-dimensional, despite the negative BB-degree of ee, since its exponent is bounded by the HH-degree. Equality of these Hilbert functions proves equality of the ideals.

Finally, localize at y0≠0y_0\ne0 and at a nonzero qiq_i, and trivialize HH by either ss or tt. The weight filtration is then the local (1,2)(1,2) filtration on the smooth transverse coordinates, hence ordF\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_F. Localization is injective on the initial domain. Therefore no further increase of order occurs for a nonzero global initial form. This identifies the actual divisorial filtration with (54.2). ◻

Lemma 54.4 (The actual refined spaces). Write j=2r+ϵj=2r+\epsilon, where ϵ∈{0,1}\epsilon\in\{0,1\}, and put M=m−ϵM=m-\epsilon and k=max(0,r−m)k=\max(0,r-m). For 0≤r≤2m−ϵ0\le r\le2m-\epsilon, Wm,jF=grFjH0(X,mL)≅H0(F,ℐPk⊗𝒪F(M,r)).W^F_{m,j}=\mathop{\mathrm{gr}}_F^j H^0(X,mL) \cong H^0\bigl(F,\mathcal I_P^k\otimes\mathcal O_F(M,r)\bigr). The zero divisor of a refined section is ϵD/2+div(σ)\epsilon D/2+\operatorname{div}(\sigma), with σ\sigma in this space. The space vanishes for r>2m−ϵr>2m-\epsilon, and in the stated range (54.3)dimWm,2r+ϵF=(M+1)(r+1)−k(k+1)2.\label{f216:eq:dimensions} \dim W^F_{m,2r+\epsilon}=(M+1)(r+1)-\frac{k(k+1)}2.

Proof. Use Lemma 54.3, set y0=1y_0=1, and substitute e=te=t, z=Rz=R, and x2=−qx^2=-q. Every monomial becomes xϵx^\epsilon times a polynomial of bidegree (M,r)(M,r) in s,t,u,vs,t,u,v. More explicitly, a monomial with xx-exponent 2a+ϵ2a+\epsilon, zz-exponent cc, ee-exponent dd, and total u,vu,v-exponent bb has r=a+c+br=a+c+b and b≤m+db\le m+d. After substitution it contains qaRctdq^aR^ct^d. Since q=sR+tTq=sR+tT, it lies in (t,R)k(t,R)^k whenever r>mr>m. The same monomial has a+c+d≤m−ϵa+c+d\le m-\epsilon, so r≤2m−ϵr\le2m-\epsilon. This proves the inclusion and the vanishing assertion.

For r≤mr\le m, every polynomial of bidegree (M,r)(M,r) lifts, by using ss, t=ey0t=e y_0, u,vu,v, and enough factors y0y_0. For r>mr>m, one has k=r−m≤Mk=r-m\le M. The ideal sheaf of PP is generated by tt of bidegree (1,0)(1,0) and RR of bidegree (1,1)(1,1). Its kkth power is generated by tk−cRct^{k-c}R^c, for 0≤c≤k0\le c\le k. The power resolution, after twisting, is 0→⨁c=0k−1𝒪F(M−k−1,r−c−1)→⨁c=0k𝒪F(M−k,r−c)→ℐPk(M,r)→0.0\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{c=0}^{k-1} \mathcal O_F(M-k-1,r-c-1) \longrightarrow\bigoplus_{c=0}^{k} \mathcal O_F(M-k,r-c) \longrightarrow\mathcal I_P^k(M,r)\longrightarrow0. The first term has no H1H^1, since M−k−1≥−1M-k-1\ge-1 and r−c−1≥0r-c-1\ge0. Consequently, every section is a sum of tk−cRct^{k-c}R^c times polynomials of bidegree (M−k,r−c)(M-k,r-c). Lift RR to zz, tt to ee in these fixed factors, and tt to ey0e y_0 in the remaining polynomial. The inequality for the available base degree is r−c=m+(k−c)r-c=m+(k-c), exactly the required equality. Thus every section lifts to a section of mLmL of native weight 2r+ϵ2r+\epsilon after multiplication by xϵx^\epsilon.

At a point of ℙ1×ℙ1\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1, the condition of vanishing to order kk imposes k(k+1)/2k(k+1)/2 independent conditions on bidegree (M,r)(M,r) when M,r≥k−1M,r\ge k-1. One can check independence on the local monomials of total degree less than kk. This gives (54.3). The odd factor has square −q-q, so its reflexive zero divisor is D/2D/2. Its class checks the formula: (M,r)+ϵ(1,1/2)=(m,j/2)(M,r)+\epsilon(1,1/2)=(m,j/2), the class of (mω*L−jF)|F(m\omega^*L-jF)|_F. ◻

Example 54.5 (The first anticanonical degree). For m=1m=1, the dimensions for native weights j=0,1,2,3,4j=0,1,2,3,4 are 2,1,4,2,52,1,4,2,5. Their sum is 14=h0(X,L)14=h^0(X,L), and their weighted sum is 3535. At the last weight, the five-dimensional space is H0(ℐP(1,2))H^0(\mathcal I_P(1,2)): the one missing section records the actual point condition. Using the full six-dimensional space would change the normalization and the threshold calculation.