Section 54
Extracting a double conic fibre
Fix a nonreduced fibre , and choose . Its reduced curve has . It is not contained in : a curve in either has -degree zero or maps onto the conic and has even positive -degree. Thus maps to a line in . Also ; its intersection with is one reduced point, denoted by .
Lemma 54.1 (The leading equations). There are coordinates as in Lemma 53.4, with , , in which the following holds. Set . The line has coordinates , and is . Give respective weights . Then the lowest-weight parts of the two equations are (54.1) where and , with linear forms. The binary quadrics defined by have no common zero. Consequently, on the curve is a smooth -curve, and is a single reduced point on .
Proof. The fibre plane is cut out by , a nonzero linear form in the four fibre coordinates of . Its intersection with is tangent to the smooth conic : restricting the double-line equation to that line gives twice the point . Choose coordinates on so that , , and its tangent line is . The fibre-plane equation is therefore a nonzero multiple of . Replace by . On this plane the other quadric is a square; replacing by and scaling its equation makes this square . A further replacement of by absorbs the remaining term. These changes preserve , its conic, and the two divisor gradings.
The remaining terms of contain or ; its terms of weight two are linear in times . The remaining terms of , after , contain or , and their weight-two terms are times a linear form in times . This gives (54.1). On , eliminate . The first transverse terms along are . If vanished simultaneously, the total space would be singular at the corresponding point. Thus they define a degree-two morphism , whose graph is . At one has , so is a nonzero linear form. The equations cut out one reduced point, and the same identity shows that it belongs to . ◻
Lemma 54.2 (The extraction and the different). Let and . Its reduced exceptional divisor is of plt type. With and , one has
Proof. Where is nonzero, eliminate in the local equation. Then , and its blow-up is the transverse weighted blow-up of weights . Its charts are and . The second chart is an surface singularity times the smooth curve direction, so the blow-up is normal. Since is flat, blowing up the fibre ideal is base change from . Its exceptional scheme is , proving the product description and the identity . The formula for follows from .
On the smooth chart, , giving discrepancy three. On the other chart the index cover for is , , , modulo . Adjunction gives coefficient on its singular-locus curve; Lemma 54.1 identifies that curve with . The quotient description also proves that is plt. Finally, is the relatively ample tautological divisor of the blow-up. These facts verify all the extraction hypotheses. ◻
Lemma 54.3 (Exactness of the initial algebra). The associated graded ring of the section ring in Lemma 53.4, for the divisorial filtration , is (54.2) This is a prime complete intersection. In particular, the displayed initial forms account for cancellations of global sections.
Proof. On , eliminate and put . The remaining equation is It is irreducible. Indeed, it is a primitive linear polynomial in over , since are coprime. Thus this open set is integral of dimension five.
On the boundary , write and . Here . The two equations become On they cut out a four-dimensional set. On one has , and the four variables remain. Therefore the boundary has dimension four. The two equations have height two, so their quotient is Cohen–Macaulay and unmixed. No component is contained in the boundary; the integral open set has only one component and is generically reduced. Unmixedness now proves that is a domain.
The displayed ideal is contained in the weight initial ideal of . The original quotient and the displayed candidate quotient are complete intersections of bidegrees and . The weight initial quotient has the same bigraded Hilbert function as the original quotient, so the candidate and initial quotients have equal Hilbert functions. Each piece is finite-dimensional, despite the negative -degree of , since its exponent is bounded by the -degree. Equality of these Hilbert functions proves equality of the ideals.
Finally, localize at and at a nonzero , and trivialize by either or . The weight filtration is then the local filtration on the smooth transverse coordinates, hence . Localization is injective on the initial domain. Therefore no further increase of order occurs for a nonzero global initial form. This identifies the actual divisorial filtration with (54.2). ◻
Lemma 54.4 (The actual refined spaces). Write , where , and put and . For , The zero divisor of a refined section is , with in this space. The space vanishes for , and in the stated range (54.3)
Proof. Use Lemma 54.3, set , and substitute , , and . Every monomial becomes times a polynomial of bidegree in . More explicitly, a monomial with -exponent , -exponent , -exponent , and total -exponent has and . After substitution it contains . Since , it lies in whenever . The same monomial has , so . This proves the inclusion and the vanishing assertion.
For , every polynomial of bidegree lifts, by using , , , and enough factors . For , one has . The ideal sheaf of is generated by of bidegree and of bidegree . Its th power is generated by , for . The power resolution, after twisting, is The first term has no , since and . Consequently, every section is a sum of times polynomials of bidegree . Lift to , to in these fixed factors, and to in the remaining polynomial. The inequality for the available base degree is , exactly the required equality. Thus every section lifts to a section of of native weight after multiplication by .
At a point of , the condition of vanishing to order imposes independent conditions on bidegree when . One can check independence on the local monomials of total degree less than . This gives (54.3). The odd factor has square , so its reflexive zero divisor is . Its class checks the formula: , the class of . ◻
Example 54.5 (The first anticanonical degree). For , the dimensions for native weights are . Their sum is , and their weighted sum is . At the last weight, the five-dimensional space is : the one missing section records the actual point condition. Using the full six-dimensional space would change the normalization and the threshold calculation.