Text size

Section 57

A second proof for Family 2.16: the CM polarization

We give an independent proof of K-stability for every smooth member of Family 2.16. It uses the parameter space proposed in [28, Section 6] and the relative reconstruction proved in [34, Appendix A]. The new steps are the calculation of the CM line and a Hilbert–Mumford inequality for every smooth pair. CM-degree minimization then compares two fillings of the same punctured family. In particular, we do not assume the conjectural identification of the entire K-moduli space with a GIT quotient. None of the local threshold estimates in the preceding sections is used.

Theorem 57.1. Let V⊂ℙ5V\subset\mathbb P^5 be a smooth intersection of two quadrics and let C⊂VC\subset V be a smooth conic. Then BlCV\mathop{\mathrm{Bl}}_CV is K-stable.

Put E=ℂ6E=\mathbb C^6 and use the convention that ℙ(E)\mathbb P(E) parametrizes lines. On Gr(3,E)\operatorname{Gr}(3,E) let 𝒮⊂E⊗𝒪\mathcal S\subset E\otimes\mathcal O be the tautological rank-three subbundle. Set ℋ=ℙGr(3,E)(Sym2𝒮*),𝒢=Gr(2,Sym2E*).\mathcal H=\mathbb P_{\operatorname{Gr}(3,E)}(\operatorname{Sym}^2\mathcal S^*), \qquad \mathcal G=\operatorname{Gr}(2,\operatorname{Sym}^2E^*). A point of ℋ\mathcal H is a plane Π=ℙ(S)\Pi=\mathbb P(S) together with a nonzero quadratic equation on Π\Pi, considered up to a scalar. Thus ℋ\mathcal H parametrizes plane conics, including reducible and double conics. Let 𝒫\mathcal P denote the tautological rank-two bundle on 𝒢\mathcal G. We use additive notation for line bundles and write ζ=𝒪ℋ(1),ξ=det𝒮*,η=det𝒫*.\zeta=\mathcal O_{\mathcal H}(1),\qquad \xi=\det\mathcal S^*,\qquad \eta=\det\mathcal P^*. Their pullbacks will have the same names. Define W={(C,P)∈ℋ×𝒢:P⊂H0(ℙ5,ℐC(2))}.W=\{(C,P)\in\mathcal H\times\mathcal G: P\subset H^0(\mathbb P^5,\mathcal I_C(2))\}. Since h0(ℐC(2))=16h^0(\mathcal I_C(2))=16 for every plane conic, W→ℋW\to\mathcal H is a relative Gr(2,16)\operatorname{Gr}(2,16). In particular, WW is smooth, projective and irreducible. Its points need not all define Fano threefolds. The locus WsmW^\mathrm{sm} on which V=V(P)V=V(P) and CC are smooth is a nonempty open subset. The group SL(E)\operatorname{SL}(E) acts on all these spaces. Passing to PGL(E)\operatorname{PGL}(E) does not change stability; a suitable positive power of any linearization below descends through the finite centre.

Definition 57.2. For a flat family f:𝒳→Tf:\mathcal X\to T of Fano threefolds with relatively ample ℚ\mathbb Q-Cartier anticanonical divisor, we normalize the CM ℚ\mathbb Q-line bundle by c1(λCM,f)=−f*c1(−K𝒳/T)4.c_1(\lambda_{\mathrm{CM},f})=-f_*c_1(-K_{\mathcal X/T})^4. Equivalently, this is the corresponding Deligne pairing with its sign reversed. It is functorial under base change. Multiplying this normalization by a positive rational number changes none of the stability or degree comparisons below.

Lemma 57.3. The CM line of the universal blow-up family is the restriction of (57.1)ℒ=6ζ+20ξ+66η∈Pic(W).\label{f216:eq:git-cm} \mathcal L=6\zeta+20\xi+66\eta\in\operatorname{Pic}(W). This equality holds, with the natural linearizations, both on the smooth Fano locus and for the relative blow-up families furnished by [34, Proposition A.13].

Proof. We calculate in the ambient blow-up, so the centre need not be a regular embedding in VV. A plane conic is a regular embedding of codimension four in ℙ5\mathbb P^5, even when it is a double line. Let 𝒞\mathcal C be the universal conic and let h=c1(𝒪ℙ5(1))h=c_1(\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^5}(1)). On ℙ(𝒮)\mathbb P(\mathcal S) its class is 2h+ζ2h+\zeta. For the projection p:𝒞→Wp:\mathcal C\to W we have (57.2)p*h=2,p*h2=2ξ+ζ.\label{f216:eq:git-conic-push} p_*h=2,\qquad p_*h^2=2\xi+\zeta. Indeed, on ℙ(𝒮)\mathbb P(\mathcal S) the pushforwards of h2h^2 and h3h^3 are 11 and −c1(𝒮)=ξ-c_1(\mathcal S)=\xi.

Write N=N𝒞/(ℙ5×W)N=N_{\mathcal C/(\mathbb P^5\times W)}. The normal bundle of the relative plane is 𝒪(1)⊗(E/𝒮)\mathcal O(1)\otimes(E/\mathcal S) and the normal bundle of the conic in this plane is 𝒪(2)⊗𝒪ℋ(1)\mathcal O(2)\otimes\mathcal O_{\mathcal H}(1). The normal bundle sequence gives, modulo terms pulled back from base classes of codimension at least two, c1(N)=5h+ξ+ζ,c2(N)=9h2+4hξ+3hζ,c1(N)2−c2(N)=16h2+6hξ+7hζ.\begin{split} c_1(N)&=5h+\xi+\zeta,\\ c_2(N)&=9h^2+4h\xi+3h\zeta,\\ c_1(N)^2-c_2(N)&=16h^2+6h\xi+7h\zeta. \end{split} The omitted terms make no contribution to the divisor classes being computed. Therefore (57.3)p*(hc1(N))=12ξ+7ζ,p*(c1(N)2−c2(N))=44ξ+30ζ.\label{f216:eq:git-normal-push} \begin{split} p_*(h\,c_1(N))&=12\xi+7\zeta,\\ p_*(c_1(N)^2-c_2(N))&=44\xi+30\zeta. \end{split}

Let b:Z=Bl𝒞(ℙ5×W)→ℙ5×Wb:Z=\mathop{\mathrm{Bl}}_{\mathcal C}(\mathbb P^5\times W)\to\mathbb P^5\times W and denote its exceptional divisor by FF. Put z=2h−Fz=2h-F and let q:Z→Wq:Z\to W be the projection. The blow-up formula for a regular embedding of codimension four is b*Fj=0(1≤j≤3),b*F4=−[𝒞],b*F5=−i*c1(N),b*F6=−i*(c1(N)2−c2(N)),b_*F^j=0\ (1\le j\le3),\quad b_*F^4=-[\mathcal C],\quad b_*F^5=-i_*c_1(N),\quad b_*F^6=-i_*(c_1(N)^2-c_2(N)), where ii is the inclusion of 𝒞\mathcal C. On a fibre, degN=10\deg N=10, so (57.4)q*z5=32−10degC+degN=22,q*z6=−60p*h2+12p*(hc1(N))−p*(c1(N)2−c2(N))=−20ξ−6ζ.\label{f216:eq:git-ambient-push} \begin{split} q_*z^5&=32-10\deg C+\deg N=22,\\ q_*z^6&=-60p_*h^2+12p_*(h\,c_1(N)) -p_*(c_1(N)^2-c_2(N))\\ &=-20\xi-6\zeta. \end{split} The strict transform 𝒳\mathcal X of VV is the zero locus of the two transformed quadrics. Its class and relative anticanonical class are [𝒳]=z2+zη+c2(𝒫*),−K𝒳/W=(z−η)|𝒳.[\mathcal X]=z^2+z\eta+c_2(\mathcal P^*),\qquad -K_{\mathcal X/W}=(z-\eta)|_{\mathcal X}. Here adjunction uses KZ/W=−6h+3FK_{Z/W}=-6h+3F. These identities apply on the locus where the strict transform is the blow-up and is a relative complete intersection. This includes the smooth families and the reconstructed families by [34, Lemma A.12 and Proposition A.13]. All the ambient formulas remain valid for singular plane conics, since their embeddings in the ambient projective bundle are regular.

Keeping the terms contributing a divisor on the base gives f*(−K𝒳/W)4=q*(z6−3ηz5)=−6ζ−20ξ−66η.f_*(-K_{\mathcal X/W})^4=q_*(z^6-3\eta z^5) =-6\zeta-20\xi-66\eta. This proves (57.1). To keep track of the line bundle, rather than only its numerical class, use the Koszul complex of the two transformed quadrics on ZZ. Its degree-four determinant-of-cohomology coefficient after twisting by m(z−η)m(z-\eta), with the negative sign and normalization above, defines a rational line bundle on all of WW. On every flat complete-intersection locus it is the CM line just calculated. Thus this is a functorial extension even at parameter points where we do not have a Fano family. The Picard group of the projective and Grassmann bundles is freely generated by the three displayed classes, and SL(E)\operatorname{SL}(E) has no characters. The computed class therefore identifies this extension and its linearization with ℒ\mathcal L. On a nontrivial rank-six projective bundle the calculation is made after taking frames; changing frames gives exactly this linearization. ◻

Example 57.4. Fix the plane and a pencil of conics in it. On this curve of ℋ\mathcal H, ξ=0\xi=0 and degζ=1\deg\zeta=1, so p*h2p_*h^2 has degree one. This is also the number of conics in the pencil through the point cut out by two general hyperplanes. For the ambient blow-up, the second formula in (57.4) consequently has degree −6-6. For the full family the pencil of quadrics contributes the additional term −66degη-66\deg\eta. This separates the contribution of the centre from that of the threefold.

Lemma 57.5. The line bundle ℒ\mathcal L is ample on WW.

Proof. The bundle Sym2𝒮⊗(det𝒮*)2≃Sym2(⋀2𝒮*)\operatorname{Sym}^2\mathcal S\otimes(\det\mathcal S^*)^2 \simeq\operatorname{Sym}^2(\bigwedge^2\mathcal S^*) is globally generated. Its pullback surjects onto 𝒪ℋ(ζ+2ξ)\mathcal O_{\mathcal H}(\zeta+2\xi). Thus ζ+2ξ\zeta+2\xi is globally generated and relatively ample over Gr(3,E)\operatorname{Gr}(3,E). Adding the pullback of the ample Plücker class shows that ζ+3ξ\zeta+3\xi is ample on ℋ\mathcal H. Now ℒ=6(ζ+3ξ)+2ξ+66η\mathcal L=6(\zeta+3\xi)+2\xi+66\eta is the restriction of an ample line bundle on ℋ×𝒢\mathcal H\times\mathcal G: the first summand is ample on the first factor, ξ\xi is nef, and η\eta is ample on the second factor. ◻