Section 58
Hilbert–Mumford inequalities for smooth pairs
For clarity, we fix the sign convention. If a one-parameter subgroup acts on a vector space and is a nonzero vector, let be the least weight of a nonzero component of . The weight of at is . We denote the fibre weight of a linearized line bundle by . For an ample linearization, the Hilbert–Mumford criterion [39] says that a point is stable precisely when for every nontrivial one-parameter subgroup, and semistable when all these weights are nonnegative.
Lemma 58.1. If is smooth, the determinant of its pencil is a binary sextic with six distinct zeros. Every singular member has rank five, and the projective stabilizer of the pencil is finite.
Proof. Bertini’s theorem gives a nonsingular member : outside the base locus apply Bertini, while on the base locus every nonzero linear combination of the two gradients is nonzero. Write a second member as , and let , which is self-adjoint for the nondegenerate symmetric form . A repeated eigenvalue would give an eigenvector with . If its eigenspace has dimension at least two, choose an isotropic vector in that eigenspace. If it has dimension one, a Jordan chain gives and hence . Then and , producing a singular point of . Thus has six distinct eigenvalues. This proves the assertions about the determinant and ranks.
Conversely, a pencil with six distinct determinant zeros has a nonsingular member and an -orthogonal eigenbasis for . In this basis its equations are with the distinct. Dependent gradients would force a point to be supported in a single coordinate, which cannot satisfy the first equation. Thus its intersection is smooth as well.
A projective transformation preserving the pencil permutes its six singular members. The kernel of this action fixes every member of the pencil. After rescaling a linear representative, it preserves and and hence commutes with . In an -orthogonal eigenbasis of it is a diagonal sign matrix. Thus the kernel is finite, and the action on the pencil has finite image. ◻
Lemma 58.2. Let be the weights of a nontrivial one-parameter subgroup on the linear coordinates, so . Let be a pencil defining a smooth intersection of two quadrics. Choose a basis adapted to the weight filtration and put Then (58.1)
Proof. Being adapted means that the initial forms of the basis give a basis of the associated graded pencil. Thus the initial Plücker coordinate has weight , proving the last equality.
Suppose first that . Every monomial of both quadrics then has nonnegative weight. Every term in their determinant polynomial has total weight . Consequently that determinant is unchanged if both quadrics are replaced by their weight-zero parts. The latter therefore form a pencil with six distinct determinant zeros. By the same elementary linear-algebra criterion used in Lemma 58.1, its intersection is smooth. The one-parameter subgroup fixes both weight-zero quadrics. This contradicts the finiteness of its projective stabilizer. Hence .
If is nonsingular, a nonzero determinant term gives , which suffices. If is singular, its zero in the determinant sextic is simple. The coefficient of in is therefore nonzero. Each of its terms uses one matrix entry of and five of , and again has total coordinate weight zero. Thus . ◻
Lemma 58.3. In calculating the Hilbert–Mumford weight of a pair , one may assume that is a coordinate plane invariant under , without changing any of the three weights for or the smoothness of and .
Proof. Choose an eigenbasis within each weight space. Row reduction relative to the weight filtration gives a unipotent transformation such that Concretely, a basis of the plane consists of pivot vectors plus terms of higher vector weight, and removes those terms. Such a transformation preserves initial vectors in every representation. Equivalently, belongs to the unipotent radical of the parabolic associated to . It therefore preserves the limits and fibre weights of the three linearized bundles. Replace by . The limiting plane is invariant; a change of basis inside the weight spaces makes it a coordinate plane. ◻
Lemma 58.4. In the coordinates of Lemma 58.3, let be the sum of the three coordinate weights on . If is the quadratic equation of the smooth conic and , then (58.2)
Proof. The plane is a subspace of , whose vector weights are the negatives of the coordinate weights. Thus has weight . The weight of is by its definition. The matrix of is nonsingular. A nonzero determinant term uses three entries, each with weight at least , and its total coordinate weight is . This proves .
The plane is not contained in . Indeed, on such a plane the normal derivatives of two defining quadrics would give an everywhere surjective map if were smooth. Its kernel would be , contradicting the equality of second Chern classes in this exact sequence. Therefore some member of restricts to a nonzero scalar multiple of . Every element of has least weight at least . Restricting to an invariant coordinate plane only deletes monomials, so . ◻
Proposition 58.5. Every point of is GIT stable for . More precisely, for every nontrivial one-parameter subgroup, (58.3)
Proof. Apply the preceding lemmas. From and we get Moreover, . Substitution gives The line bundle is ample by Lemma 57.5, so the Hilbert–Mumford criterion applies. ◻
Remark 58.6. The same calculation proves stability of every smooth pair for whenever : the lower bound becomes . The actual CM coefficient is . This is a simultaneous inequality for all one-parameter subgroups, so no enumeration of possible weighted flags is needed.
Example 58.7. Consider coordinates and The determinant of the Hessian of is , which is squarefree. Its leading coefficient is nonzero, so the pencil has six distinct singular members and is smooth. On the conic is . Give the linear coordinates weights . Then The conic contribution is negative: the positivity comes from including the pencil contribution . For the inverse subgroup the corresponding weight is . This calculation illustrates why the three terms of the CM polarization must be kept with their actual coefficients.