Text size

Section 11

Expected vanishing orders on the threefold

We use the invariants defined in Section 2, with L3=16L^3=16. The distinction between divisors on XX and divisors over XX is retained throughout.

Lemma 11.1. One has H3=1,H2E=0,HE2=−7,E3=−36,H2B=3,HB2=2,B3=0.H^3=1,\quad H^2E=0,\quad HE^2=-7,\quad E^3=-36, \qquad H^2B=3,\quad HB^2=2,\quad B^3=0. The nef cone is generated by H,BH,B, and the effective cone by E,BE,B.

Proof. The blow-up formulas give the first three intersections. The degree of NC/ℙ3N_{C/\mathbb P^3} is 4degC+2g(C)−2=364\deg C+2g(C)-2=36, giving E3=−36E^3=-36. Substituting B=3H−EB=3H-E gives the remaining intersections and (H+B)3=16(H+B)^3=16.

Both HH and BB are nef. If ff is a fibre of E→CE\to C, then Hf=0Hf=0 and Bf=1Bf=1. If zz is a general conic fibre, then Hz=2Hz=2 and Bz=0Bz=0. As the Picard rank is two, these tests give the asserted nef cone.

Let D≠ED\ne E be a prime divisor. It is the strict transform of a surface of degree a≥1a\ge1 with multiplicity b≥0b\ge0 along CC, so D∼aH−bED\sim aH-bE. Restrict to a general smooth cubic SS not contained in DD. The restriction is effective, and its intersection with the nef conic class FF is 2a−6b2a-6b. Thus a≥3ba\ge3b. It follows that D=(a−3b)H+bBD=(a-3b)H+bB, with nonnegative coefficients. Since H=(E+B)/3H=(E+B)/3, all effective classes lie in the cone generated by E,BE,B, and both generators are effective. ◻

Lemma 11.2 (The three volume integrals). The volume functions needed in Theorem 10.1 are vol(L−uH)=(1−u)3+9(1−u)2+6(1−u),0≤u≤1,vol(L−uE)=16−60u+24u2+36u3,0≤u≤13,vol(L−uB)={1+9(1−u)+6(1−u)2,0≤u≤1,(4−3u)3,1≤u≤43.\begin{aligned} \mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(L-uH)&=(1-u)^3+9(1-u)^2+6(1-u),&&0\le u\le1,\\ \mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(L-uE)&=16-60u+24u^2+36u^3,&&0\le u\le\tfrac13,\\ \mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(L-uB)&= \begin{cases}1+9(1-u)+6(1-u)^2,&0\le u\le1,\\ (4-3u)^3,&1\le u\le\tfrac43. \end{cases} \end{aligned} They vanish beyond the displayed intervals.

Proof. The effective cone gives the thresholds 1,1/3,4/31,1/3,4/3, respectively. Up to the first two thresholds the divisors are nef: L−uH=(1−u)H+B,L−uE=(1−3u)H+(1+u)B.L-uH=(1-u)H+B,\qquad L-uE=(1-3u)H+(1+u)B. Likewise L−uB=H+(1−u)BL-uB=H+(1-u)B is nef for 0≤u≤10\le u\le1. The cube of aH+bBaH+bB is a3+9a2b+6ab2a^3+9a^2b+6ab^2.

For 1≤u≤4/31\le u\le4/3, write L−uB=(4−3u)H+(u−1)E.L-uB=(4-3u)H+(u-1)E. The EE term is fixed: restriction to a general fibre of E→CE\to C forces its coefficient, and the remaining complete series is pulled back from ℙ3\mathbb P^3. Equivalently, π*𝒪X(kE)=𝒪ℙ3\pi_*\mathcal O_X(kE)=\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^3} for k≥0k\ge0. The volume is therefore (4−3u)3(4-3u)^3. ◻

Proof of Theorem 10.1. Integration of Lemma 11.2, with denominator 1616, gives SX(H)=116(14+3+3)=2564,SX(B)=116(152+112)=91192,S_X(H)=\frac1{16}\left(\frac14+3+3\right)=\frac{25}{64},\quad S_X(B)=\frac1{16}\left(\frac{15}{2}+\frac1{12}\right)=\frac{91}{192}, SX(E)=116(163−103+827+19)=65432.S_X(E)=\frac1{16}\left(\frac{16}{3}-\frac{10}{3}+\frac8{27}+\frac19\right) =\frac{65}{432}. If D≠ED\ne E is prime, put k=a−3bk=a-3b as in Lemma 11.1. The integers k,bk,b are nonnegative and not both zero. If k≥1k\ge1, then D−HD-H is effective and SX(D)≤SX(H)S_X(D)\le S_X(H). If k=0k=0, then b≥1b\ge1, D−BD-B is effective and SX(D)≤SX(B)S_X(D)\le S_X(B). These inequalities follow from monotonicity of volume. Since every prime divisor on the smooth threefold has discrepancy one, all these beta invariants are positive, including that of EE. ◻