Section 11
Expected vanishing orders on the threefold
We use the invariants defined in Section 2, with . The distinction between divisors on and divisors over is retained throughout.
Lemma 11.1. One has The nef cone is generated by , and the effective cone by .
Proof. The blow-up formulas give the first three intersections. The degree of is , giving . Substituting gives the remaining intersections and .
Both and are nef. If is a fibre of , then and . If is a general conic fibre, then and . As the Picard rank is two, these tests give the asserted nef cone.
Let be a prime divisor. It is the strict transform of a surface of degree with multiplicity along , so . Restrict to a general smooth cubic not contained in . The restriction is effective, and its intersection with the nef conic class is . Thus . It follows that , with nonnegative coefficients. Since , all effective classes lie in the cone generated by , and both generators are effective. ◻
Lemma 11.2 (The three volume integrals). The volume functions needed in Theorem 10.1 are They vanish beyond the displayed intervals.
Proof. The effective cone gives the thresholds , respectively. Up to the first two thresholds the divisors are nef: Likewise is nef for . The cube of is .
For , write The term is fixed: restriction to a general fibre of forces its coefficient, and the remaining complete series is pulled back from . Equivalently, for . The volume is therefore . ◻
Proof of Theorem 10.1. Integration of Lemma 11.2, with denominator , gives If is prime, put as in Lemma 11.1. The integers are nonnegative and not both zero. If , then is effective and . If , then , is effective and . These inequalities follow from monotonicity of volume. Since every prime divisor on the smooth threefold has discrepancy one, all these beta invariants are positive, including that of . ◻