Text size

Section 16

Complete decomposition in transverse position

We can continue the calculation when (16.1)C∩Π=2p0+c1+⋯+c5,c1,…,c5 distinct,ci∉Tp0C.\label{f29:eq:transverse-assumption} C\cap\Pi=2p_0+c_1+\cdots+c_5, \quad c_1,\ldots,c_5\text{ distinct},\quad c_i\notin T_{p_0}C. The intersections at the cic_i are simple. These are additional assumptions, not consequences of smoothness of XX. In particular, this section does not address the higher-contact cases in which (C⋅Z)p0≥2(C\cdot Z)_{p_0}\ge2.

Lemma 16.1 (The six curves at the next wall). Under (16.1), let Γi\Gamma_i be the strict transform in XX of the line p0cip_0c_i. Each passes through pp, has LL-degree two and has NΓi/X=𝒪⊕2N_{\Gamma_i/X}=\mathcal O^{\oplus2}. On Y2Y_2, the strict transforms of Z,Γ1,…,Γ5Z,\Gamma_1,\ldots,\Gamma_5 are pairwise disjoint, disjoint from R∪TR\cup T, and have normal bundle 𝒪(−1)⊕2\mathcal O(-1)^{\oplus2}.

Proof. Choose a smooth cubic containing ZZ. Its plane section by Π\Pi is Z+ℓZ+\ell, and C⋅ℓ=p0C\cdot\ell=p_0. Thus C∩Z=p0+c1+⋯+c5C\cap Z=p_0+c_1+\cdots+c_5 scheme-theoretically. In particular, ZZ meets CC transversely at all six points.

Since Π\Pi contains Tp0CT_{p_0}C, every line in Π\Pi through p0p_0 other than Tp0CT_{p_0}C lifts to a curve through the selected point p∈f0p\in f_0. The line p0cip_0c_i meets CC only at those two points, both transversely. An additional intersection would make its BB-degree zero (or negative). Degree zero would put its lift in the smooth conic fibre through pp, which cannot contain a line; negative degree contradicts nefness of BB. Hence H⋅Γi=B⋅Γi=1H\cdot\Gamma_i=B\cdot\Gamma_i=1.

The normal bundle of a line in ℙ3\mathbb P^3 is 𝒪(1)⊕2\mathcal O(1)^{\oplus2}. Blowing up CC makes one elementary modification at each of p0,cip_0,c_i. The two quotient directions are distinct: the plane spanned by the line and Tp0CT_{p_0}C is Π\Pi, whereas TciCT_{c_i}C is transverse to Π\Pi. Two modifications in distinct directions at distinct points yield 𝒪⊕2\mathcal O^{\oplus2}. Blowing up pp then yields 𝒪(−1)⊕2\mathcal O(-1)^{\oplus2}. The same conclusion for ZZ follows from its being a smooth fibre of φ\varphi.

Distinct lines p0cip_0c_i have distinct directions, since three collinear points would give the excluded trisecant through pp. None is tangent to the smooth conic through both its endpoints. Blowing up CC separates the line and conic at cic_i, and blowing up pp separates all their remaining intersections. Their tangent directions differ from Tpf0T_pf_0, so they also avoid the first two centres. ◻

Blow up these six curves on Y2Y_2, and denote the resulting smooth model by Ŷ\widehat Y. Write U0,U1,…,U5U_0,U_1,\ldots,U_5 for the exceptional quadrics, with U0U_0 corresponding to ZZ. Let QQ be the strict transform of the surface π−1(Π)\pi^{-1}(\Pi), and let η:Ŷ→Y\eta:\widehat Y\to Y be the composite morphism. On this model, Q=H−2G−R−2T−∑i=05Ui.Q=H-2G-R-2T-\sum_{i=0}^5U_i. All six centres lie in the surface; blowing up a Cartier curve does not change its intrinsic surface.

Lemma 16.2 (The endpoint of the second chamber). The divisor P5/2=H+B−52G−34R−32T−12∑i=05UiP_{5/2}=H+B-\tfrac52G-\tfrac34R-\tfrac32T-\tfrac12\sum_{i=0}^5U_i is nef on Ŷ\widehat Y. The divisor F=B−G−U0F=B-G-U_0 is globally generated.

Proof. The pencil of base lines through φ(p)\varphi(p) has ideal ℐZ\mathcal I_Z. Blowing up pp and then the strict transform of ZZ principalizes this ideal, with total divisor G+U0G+U_0. The other centres are disjoint from ZZ. Hence FF is globally generated.

For nefness, first observe the effective expression P5/2=Q+F+12G+14R+12T+32U0+12∑i=15Ui.P_{5/2}=Q+F+\tfrac12G+\tfrac14R+\tfrac12T +\tfrac32U_0+\tfrac12\sum_{i=1}^5U_i. It gives nonnegative intersection with curves outside the displayed divisors. On RR the restriction is zero, on TT it is 𝒪(0,3/4)\mathcal O(0,3/4), and on each UiU_i it is 𝒪(0,1/2)\mathcal O(0,1/2), with the ruling conventions of the relevant blow-up. These restrictions are nef.

The transform of GG is the plane blown up at q,q1q,q_1 and six further distinct points. Those eight centres, counting the infinitely near point, lie on the smooth conic cut out by the tangent cone of π−1(Π)\pi^{-1}(\Pi) at pp. Smoothness of this conic follows from the contact order two in (16.1): its local equation is ηz+ct2=0\eta z+ct^2=0, c≠0c\ne0. Write e3,…,e8e_3,\ldots,e_8 for the six new total-transform exceptional classes. The restriction is 52h−34(e1+e2)−12∑i=38ei.\tfrac52h-\tfrac34(e_1+e_2)-\tfrac12\sum_{i=3}^8e_i. Its intersection with the strict conic is 1/21/2, and its intersections with the exceptional curves are nonnegative. Any other irreducible plane curve of degree dd, with multiplicities mim_i at the eight centres, satisfies ∑mi≤2d\sum m_i\le2d by intersection with that conic. Its intersection with the displayed divisor is therefore at least 5d/2−3(∑mi)/4≥d5d/2-3(\sum m_i)/4\ge d. This proves nefness on GG.

Finally, the intrinsic surface QQ is the plane blown up at p0p_0, the point infinitely near it in the direction Tp0CT_{p_0}C, and the five points cic_i. This follows directly by resolving the curvilinear ideal of length two at p0p_0; the two later curve blow-ups are along Cartier curves on this surface. Write h,ϵ0,ϵ′0,ϵ1,…,ϵ5h,\epsilon_0,\epsilon'_0,\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_5 for total-transform classes. The restrictions before the last six blow-ups are H|Q=h,G|Q=ϵ0−ϵ′0,R|Q=0,T|Q=ϵ′0,B|Q=3h−ϵ0−ϵ′0−∑i=15ϵi.H|_Q=h,\quad G|_Q=\epsilon_0-\epsilon'_0,\quad R|_Q=0,\quad T|_Q=\epsilon'_0,\quad B|_Q=3h-\epsilon_0-\epsilon'_0-\sum_{i=1}^5\epsilon_i. Also U0|Q=2h−ϵ0−∑ϵiU_0|_Q=2h-\epsilon_0-\sum\epsilon_i and Ui|Q=h−ϵ0−ϵiU_i|_Q=h-\epsilon_0-\epsilon_i for i≥1i\ge1. Substitution gives P5/2|Q=(h−ϵ0)/2P_{5/2}|_Q=(h-\epsilon_0)/2, a nef pencil class. All curves in the displayed support have now been checked. ◻

Proposition 16.3 (All chambers in transverse position). Assume (16.1). On Ŷ\widehat Y, let Pt=η*Dt−NtP_t=\eta^*D_t-N_t, where tNt[0,1]0[1,2]t−12R+(t−1)T[2,5/2]t−12R+(t−1)T+(t−2)∑i=05Ui[5/2,3]t−12R+(t−1)T+(t−2)∑i=05Ui+(2t−5)(Q+U0).\begin{array}{c|l} t&N_t\\\hline {[0,1]}&0\\ {[1,2]}&\frac{t-1}{2}R+(t-1)T\\ {[2,5/2]}&\frac{t-1}{2}R+(t-1)T+(t-2)\sum_{i=0}^5U_i\\ {[5/2,3]}&\frac{t-1}{2}R+(t-1)T+(t-2)\sum_{i=0}^5U_i+(2t-5)(Q+U_0). \end{array} Then PtP_t is nef and NtN_t is the fixed part in the section-space sense of Proposition 15.3. In particular, (16.2)vol(Dt)={16−t3,0≤t≤1,16−t3+12(t−1)3,1≤t≤2,16−t3+12(t−1)3+6(t−2)3,2≤t≤52,12(3−t)2−32(3−t)3,52≤t≤3,0,t≥3.\label{f29:eq:all-volumes} \mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(D_t)= \begin{cases} 16-t^3,&0\le t\le1,\\ 16-t^3+\frac12(t-1)^3,&1\le t\le2,\\ 16-t^3+\frac12(t-1)^3+6(t-2)^3,&2\le t\le\frac52,\\ 12(3-t)^2-\frac32(3-t)^3,&\frac52\le t\le3,\\ 0,&t\ge3. \end{cases} Consequently, SX(G)=503256,βX(G)=265256,δp(X)≥min{768503,δ(G;W)}.S_X(G)=\frac{503}{256},\qquad \beta_X(G)=\frac{265}{256},\qquad \delta_p(X)\ge\min\left\{\frac{768}{503},\delta(G;W)\right\}.

Proof. The first two chambers were proved above. On each of the six curves, DtD_t has degree 2−t2-t and the conormal bundle after the point blow-up is 𝒪(1)⊕2\mathcal O(1)^{\oplus2}. Restriction to its exceptional quadric forces coefficient at least t−2t-2 for t≥2t\ge2. Thus the first three rows are forced. Nefness on [2,5/2][2,5/2] follows by interpolation between the nef endpoint divisors P2P_2 and P5/2P_{5/2}.

For t>5/2t>5/2, subtract the already forced third-row part, obtaining a divisor with class PtoldP_t^{\mathrm{old}}. Let aa and bb be the additional coefficients of QQ and U0U_0 in any effective representative. On U0U_0, one has Ptold|U0=𝒪(0,t−2)P_t^{\mathrm{old}}|_{U_0}=\mathcal O(0,t-2) and Q|U0=𝒪(1,1)Q|_{U_0}=\mathcal O(1,1). Removing the two components and restricting to U0U_0 forces b≥ab\ge a. For a general ruling curve ll of QQ obtained from a line through p0p_0, the surface formulas in Lemma 16.2 give Ptold⋅l=5−2t,Q⋅l=−2,U0⋅l=1.P_t^{\mathrm{old}}\cdot l=5-2t,\qquad Q\cdot l=-2,\qquad U_0\cdot l=1. The remaining effective divisor does not contain QQ, so 5−2t+2a−b≥05-2t+2a-b\ge0. Together these inequalities give a≥2t−5a\ge2t-5 and b≥2t−5b\ge2t-5. This proves exactly the extra fixed part (2t−5)(Q+U0)(2t-5)(Q+U_0). The positive parts on this interval are linear in tt; at t=3t=3 they equal F=B−G−U0F=B-G-U_0. Interpolation with Lemma 16.2 proves nefness. The fixed-component inequalities give equality of section spaces as before.

The first two cubes are known. Blowing up a (−1,−1)(-1,-1) curve on which a divisor has degree −b-b, and subtracting bb times the exceptional quadric, adds b3b^3 to its cube. The six disjoint curves therefore add 6(t−2)36(t-2)^3 in the third chamber.

For clarity, the last cube can also be computed without expanding all intersections on Ŷ\widehat Y. Put s=3−ts=3-t. After removing the fixed plane, the positive part has underlying pullback class 2sH+B−(1+3s)G2sH+B-(1+3s)G, first two exceptional coefficients 3s/2,3s3s/2,3s, coefficient 1−s1-s along U0U_0, and coefficient ss along each UiU_i, i≥1i\ge1. The same blow-up formula gives Pt3=(2sH+B)3−(1+3s)3+12(3s)3+(1−s)3+5s3=12s2−32s3.\begin{aligned} P_t^3 &= (2sH+B)^3-(1+3s)^3+\tfrac12(3s)^3+(1-s)^3+5s^3\\ &=12s^2-\tfrac32s^3. \end{aligned} At t=3t=3 the volume is zero; monotonicity makes it zero thereafter. Finally, the four integrals in (16.2) are 634,998,363128,61128.\frac{63}{4},\qquad\frac{99}{8},\qquad\frac{363}{128},\qquad\frac{61}{128}. Their sum is 503/16503/16. Divide by L3=16L^3=16 and apply Lemma 14.1. ◻

Remark 16.4 (Scope of the transverse-position calculation). This calculation uses threefold Zariski decompositions obtained by blowing up base curves. Corollary 15.5 is uniform for p∈f0p\in f_0 on a smooth conic fibre. Proposition 16.3 computes the entire volume function under the additional assumptions (16.1). These assumptions must not be suppressed: in higher-contact cases, bisecants can become tangent, their transforms can meet, and the six disjoint (−1,−1)(-1,-1) blow-ups are no longer justified. Double conic fibres are treated by the weighted curve extraction of Section 18.

These volume calculations improve the 3/SX(G)3/S_X(G) term in the Abban–Zhuang minimum. They do not by themselves establish δ(G;W)>1\delta(G;W)>1. The next section supplies that further estimate, using only necessary vanishing conditions for the jet series. The nonreduced conic fibres are treated separately in Section 18.