Section 16
Complete decomposition in transverse position
We can continue the calculation when (16.1) The intersections at the are simple. These are additional assumptions, not consequences of smoothness of . In particular, this section does not address the higher-contact cases in which .
Lemma 16.1 (The six curves at the next wall). Under (16.1), let be the strict transform in of the line . Each passes through , has -degree two and has . On , the strict transforms of are pairwise disjoint, disjoint from , and have normal bundle .
Proof. Choose a smooth cubic containing . Its plane section by is , and . Thus scheme-theoretically. In particular, meets transversely at all six points.
Since contains , every line in through other than lifts to a curve through the selected point . The line meets only at those two points, both transversely. An additional intersection would make its -degree zero (or negative). Degree zero would put its lift in the smooth conic fibre through , which cannot contain a line; negative degree contradicts nefness of . Hence .
The normal bundle of a line in is . Blowing up makes one elementary modification at each of . The two quotient directions are distinct: the plane spanned by the line and is , whereas is transverse to . Two modifications in distinct directions at distinct points yield . Blowing up then yields . The same conclusion for follows from its being a smooth fibre of .
Distinct lines have distinct directions, since three collinear points would give the excluded trisecant through . None is tangent to the smooth conic through both its endpoints. Blowing up separates the line and conic at , and blowing up separates all their remaining intersections. Their tangent directions differ from , so they also avoid the first two centres. ◻
Blow up these six curves on , and denote the resulting smooth model by . Write for the exceptional quadrics, with corresponding to . Let be the strict transform of the surface , and let be the composite morphism. On this model, All six centres lie in the surface; blowing up a Cartier curve does not change its intrinsic surface.
Lemma 16.2 (The endpoint of the second chamber). The divisor is nef on . The divisor is globally generated.
Proof. The pencil of base lines through has ideal . Blowing up and then the strict transform of principalizes this ideal, with total divisor . The other centres are disjoint from . Hence is globally generated.
For nefness, first observe the effective expression It gives nonnegative intersection with curves outside the displayed divisors. On the restriction is zero, on it is , and on each it is , with the ruling conventions of the relevant blow-up. These restrictions are nef.
The transform of is the plane blown up at and six further distinct points. Those eight centres, counting the infinitely near point, lie on the smooth conic cut out by the tangent cone of at . Smoothness of this conic follows from the contact order two in (16.1): its local equation is , . Write for the six new total-transform exceptional classes. The restriction is Its intersection with the strict conic is , and its intersections with the exceptional curves are nonnegative. Any other irreducible plane curve of degree , with multiplicities at the eight centres, satisfies by intersection with that conic. Its intersection with the displayed divisor is therefore at least . This proves nefness on .
Finally, the intrinsic surface is the plane blown up at , the point infinitely near it in the direction , and the five points . This follows directly by resolving the curvilinear ideal of length two at ; the two later curve blow-ups are along Cartier curves on this surface. Write for total-transform classes. The restrictions before the last six blow-ups are Also and for . Substitution gives , a nef pencil class. All curves in the displayed support have now been checked. ◻
Proposition 16.3 (All chambers in transverse position). Assume (16.1). On , let , where Then is nef and is the fixed part in the section-space sense of Proposition 15.3. In particular, (16.2) Consequently,
Proof. The first two chambers were proved above. On each of the six curves, has degree and the conormal bundle after the point blow-up is . Restriction to its exceptional quadric forces coefficient at least for . Thus the first three rows are forced. Nefness on follows by interpolation between the nef endpoint divisors and .
For , subtract the already forced third-row part, obtaining a divisor with class . Let and be the additional coefficients of and in any effective representative. On , one has and . Removing the two components and restricting to forces . For a general ruling curve of obtained from a line through , the surface formulas in Lemma 16.2 give The remaining effective divisor does not contain , so . Together these inequalities give and . This proves exactly the extra fixed part . The positive parts on this interval are linear in ; at they equal . Interpolation with Lemma 16.2 proves nefness. The fixed-component inequalities give equality of section spaces as before.
The first two cubes are known. Blowing up a curve on which a divisor has degree , and subtracting times the exceptional quadric, adds to its cube. The six disjoint curves therefore add in the third chamber.
For clarity, the last cube can also be computed without expanding all intersections on . Put . After removing the fixed plane, the positive part has underlying pullback class , first two exceptional coefficients , coefficient along , and coefficient along each , . The same blow-up formula gives At the volume is zero; monotonicity makes it zero thereafter. Finally, the four integrals in (16.2) are Their sum is . Divide by and apply Lemma 14.1. ◻
Remark 16.4 (Scope of the transverse-position calculation). This calculation uses threefold Zariski decompositions obtained by blowing up base curves. Corollary 15.5 is uniform for on a smooth conic fibre. Proposition 16.3 computes the entire volume function under the additional assumptions (16.1). These assumptions must not be suppressed: in higher-contact cases, bisecants can become tangent, their transforms can meet, and the six disjoint blow-ups are no longer justified. Double conic fibres are treated by the weighted curve extraction of Section 18.
These volume calculations improve the term in the Abban–Zhuang minimum. They do not by themselves establish . The next section supplies that further estimate, using only necessary vanishing conditions for the jet series. The nonreduced conic fibres are treated separately in Section 18.