Text size

Section 15

Blowing up the first base curve

We now compute a genuine Zariski decomposition on a modification of the threefold. Throughout this section, p∈f0p\in f_0 and the conic Z=φ−1(φ(p))Z=\varphi^{-1}(\varphi(p)) is smooth. There is no transversality assumption on C∩ZC\cap Z. Put Dt=σ*L−tGD_t=\sigma^*L-tG on Y=BlpXY=\mathop{\mathrm{Bl}}_pX, and let ff be the strict transform of f0f_0. In formulas on further models, H,B,GH,B,G denote pullbacks; the centres below meet GG properly, so its pullback is also its strict transform.

Lemma 15.1 (Two successive curve blow-ups). One has Nf/Y=𝒪(−1)⊕𝒪(−2)N_{f/Y}=\mathcal O(-1)\oplus\mathcal O(-2). Blow up ff, obtaining τ1:Y1→Y\tau_1:Y_1\to Y with exceptional surface R1≅𝔽1R_1\cong\mathbb F_1. Its negative section ss has Ns/Y1=𝒪(−1)⊕2N_{s/Y_1}=\mathcal O(-1)^{\oplus2}. Blow up ss, obtaining τ2:Y2→Y1\tau_2:Y_2\to Y_1, with exceptional surface T≅ℙ1×ℙ1T\cong\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1. Write RR for the strict transform of R1R_1 and ρ=τ1τ2\rho=\tau_1\tau_2. Then R≅𝔽1R\cong\mathbb F_1, and, writing ee for its negative section and rr for a ruling fibre, R|R=−2e−2r,T|R=e,R|T=𝒪(0,1),T|T=𝒪(−1,−1).R|_R=-2e-2r,\qquad T|_R=e,\qquad R|_T=\mathcal O(0,1),\qquad T|_T=\mathcal O(-1,-1). The first factor of TT maps isomorphically to s≅fs\cong f.

Proof. The fibre f0f_0 in EE has normal bundle 𝒪⊕𝒪(−1)\mathcal O\oplus\mathcal O(-1) in XX: its normal bundle in EE is trivial, E⋅f0=−1E\cdot f_0=-1, and the normal sequence splits. Blowing up one point of the curve twists both normal summands by 𝒪(−1)\mathcal O(-1). Thus R1=ℙ(𝒪(−1)⊕𝒪(−2))R_1=\mathbb P(\mathcal O(-1)\oplus\mathcal O(-2)). On R1R_1 its normal bundle has class −e−2r-e-2r. Restriction to s=es=e has degree −1-1, as does Ns/R1N_{s/R_1}. The normal sequence splits, giving Ns/Y1=𝒪(−1)⊕2N_{s/Y_1}=\mathcal O(-1)^{\oplus2}.

Blowing up a Cartier curve on R1R_1 leaves that surface unchanged and subtracts ss from its normal bundle. This gives R|R=−2e−2rR|_R=-2e-2r and T|R=eT|_R=e. The other two formulas follow from T=ℙ(Ns/Y1)T=\mathbb P(N_{s/Y_1}): T|T=𝒪(−1,−1)T|_T=\mathcal O(-1,-1) and τ2*R1|T=𝒪(−1,0)\tau_2^*R_1|_T=\mathcal O(-1,0), so R|T=𝒪(0,1)R|_T=\mathcal O(0,1). ◻

Lemma 15.2 (A globally generated divisor). On Y2Y_2, the divisor 𝒜=2H−2G−R−2T\mathcal A=2H-2G-R-2T is globally generated. The strict transform of ZZ is disjoint from R∪TR\cup T.

Proof. Let Π⊂ℙ3\Pi\subset\mathbb P^3 be the plane of the conic π(Z)\pi(Z). It contains Tp0CT_{p_0}C, and the normal direction represented by pp lies in Π\Pi. Choose affine linear coordinates x,t,rx,t,r at p0p_0 such that Π=(x=0)\Pi=(x=0), Tp0C=(x=r=0)T_{p_0}C=(x=r=0), and the selected normal direction has x/r=0x/r=0. Locally CC has equations x=a(t)x=a(t), r=b(t)r=b(t), with a,b∈(t2)a,b\in(t^2). A chart of XX at pp is x=a(t)+ηz,r=b(t)+η,p=(t,η,z)=(0,0,0).x=a(t)+\eta z,\qquad r=b(t)+\eta, \qquad p=(t,\eta,z)=(0,0,0). Here E=(η=0)E=(\eta=0) and f0=(t=η=0)f_0=(t=\eta=0).

Consider the quadrics spanned by xx times all linear forms, together with t2,tr,r2t^2,tr,r^2. Their base locus in ℙ3\mathbb P^3 is just p0p_0. On the displayed chart their ideal is (x,t2,tr,r2)=(ηz,t2,ηt,η2).(x,t^2,tr,r^2)=(\eta z,t^2,\eta t,\eta^2). Blowing up pp extracts a factor of order two. The only remaining base locus is in the zz-chart, where the residual ideal is (η1,t12)(\eta_1,t_1^2). Blowing up f=(η1=t1=0)f=(\eta_1=t_1=0) extracts one copy of R1R_1 and leaves the ideal of its negative section. Blowing up that section resolves the ideal. The total exceptional factor is 2G+R+2T2G+R+2T. The same computation along the rest of f0f_0 uses (η,t2)(\eta,t^2); there are no other base points. This proves global generation.

Finally, φ|f0\varphi|_{f_0} is an isomorphism to a line. Hence Tpf0T_pf_0 differs from the tangent direction of the fibre ZZ. The two strict transforms are disjoint after blowing up pp, and all subsequent centres lie over ff. ◻

Proposition 15.3 (The first non-nef chamber). For 1≤t≤21\le t\le2, put a=(t−1)/2a=(t-1)/2. Then (15.1)ρ*Dt=Pt+Nt,Nt=aR+2aT,Pt=H+B−tG−aR−2aT\label{f29:eq:first-zd} \rho^*D_t=P_t+N_t,\qquad N_t=aR+2aT,\qquad P_t=H+B-tG-aR-2aT is a Zariski decomposition in the following explicit sense: PtP_t is nef and, for sufficiently divisible mm, multiplication by the defining section of mNtmN_t identifies H0(Y2,mPt)H^0(Y_2,mP_t) with H0(Y2,mρ*Dt)H^0(Y_2,m\rho^*D_t). Moreover, (15.2)vol(Dt)=16−t3+(t−1)32(1≤t≤2).\label{f29:eq:first-volume} \mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(D_t)=16-t^3+\frac{(t-1)^3}{2}\qquad(1\le t\le2).

Proof. First prove that the displayed coefficients are forced. Let an effective divisor numerically equivalent to ρ*Dt\rho^*D_t have coefficients α,β\alpha,\beta along R,TR,T, respectively, and remove those components. Its restrictions to RR and TT are effective and have classes (2α−β)e+(1−t+2α)r,𝒪T(1−t+β,β−α).(2\alpha-\beta)e+(1-t+2\alpha)r, \qquad \mathcal O_T(1-t+\beta,\beta-\alpha). The effective cones of 𝔽1\mathbb F_1 and ℙ1×ℙ1\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1 give α≥(t−1)/2\alpha\ge(t-1)/2 and β≥t−1\beta\ge t-1. This proves the fixed-part assertion once nefness is established.

The divisor P1=H+B−GP_1=H+B-G is globally generated. At the other endpoint, P2=12𝒜+(B−G).P_2=\tfrac12\mathcal A+(B-G). The system |B−G||B-G| has base locus exactly the strict transform of ZZ. Indeed, it comes from lines through φ(p)\varphi(p), and the fibre is smooth. It therefore has nonnegative intersection with every curve other than ZZ. Lemma 15.2 gives the same assertion for 𝒜\mathcal A, and 𝒜⋅Z=2\mathcal A\cdot Z=2, (B−G)⋅Z=−1(B-G)\cdot Z=-1. Thus P2⋅Z=0P_2\cdot Z=0 and P2P_2 is nef. Since Pt=(2−t)P1+(t−1)P2P_t=(2-t)P_1+(t-1)P_2, every PtP_t is nef.

For later use, 2P22P_2 is in fact globally generated. Products from |𝒜||\mathcal A| and |B−G|2|B-G|^2 generate it off ZZ. To cover ZZ, choose a plane section h∈H0(X,H)h\in H^0(X,H) whose restriction to ZZ vanishes exactly at 2p2p. Its differential annihilates TpZT_pZ. Since φ\varphi is smooth at pp, a section of BB vanishing at φ(p)\varphi(p) has the same differential, after choosing nonvanishing local frames. Subtracting the corresponding products gives a global section of LL vanishing to order two at pp whose strict transform does not vanish anywhere on ZZ. Its square, after removing R+2TR+2T, supplies the missing section of 2P22P_2.

For divisible mm, the forced coefficients show that every section of mρ*Dtm\rho^*D_t is divisible by mNtmN_t. Conversely, multiplying any section of mPtmP_t gives a section of mρ*Dtm\rho^*D_t. As PtP_t is nef, the volume is Pt3P_t^3.

Here is the cubic calculation. On the first blow-up, Dt⋅f=1−tD_t\cdot f=1-t, R13=3R_1^3=3, and (τ1*Dt)R12=t−1(\tau_1^*D_t)R_1^2=t-1. Subtracting aR1aR_1 changes the cube by 3a2(t−1)−3a3=3a33a^2(t-1)-3a^3=3a^3. Its intersection with ss is −a-a. On blowing up ss, subtracting aTaT changes the cube by 3a3−2a3=a33a^3-2a^3=a^3. The total change is 4a3=(t−1)3/24a^3=(t-1)^3/2, proving (15.2). ◻

Lemma 15.4 (The resolved jets on the exceptional plane). The strict transform G̃⊂Y2\widetilde G\subset Y_2 is obtained from G≅ℙ2G\cong\mathbb P^2 by blowing up q=[Tpf0]q=[T_pf_0] and then a point q1q_1 on the first exceptional curve. Write h,e1,e2h,e_1,e_2 for the total-transform plane and exceptional classes. Then Pt|G̃=th−t−12(e1+e2),Nt|G̃=t−12(e1−e2)+(t−1)e2.P_t|_{\widetilde G}=t h-\frac{t-1}{2}(e_1+e_2),\qquad N_t|_{\widetilde G}=\frac{t-1}{2}(e_1-e_2)+(t-1)e_2. For 1<t<21<t<2, the moving restricted series is asymptotically complete. In affine coordinates (u,v)(u,v) at qq, with q1q_1 specifying the direction v=0v=0, its pushforward consists asymptotically of degree-jj forms satisfying the weighted base condition (15.3)wt(1,2)(uivk)=i+2k≥j−m,j=mt.\label{f29:eq:weighted-jets} \operatorname{wt}_{(1,2)}(u^iv^k)=i+2k\ge j-m, \qquad j=mt. Its restricted volume is t2−(t−1)2/2t^2-(t-1)^2/2.

Proof. The two threefold centres meet the transform of GG transversely at q,q1q,q_1. On the final surface, R|G̃=e1−e2R|_{\widetilde G}=e_1-e_2 and T|G̃=e2T|_{\widetilde G}=e_2. This proves the class formulas. The exceptional valuations of the two surface blow-ups have weights (1,1)(1,1) and (1,2)(1,2) in (u,v)(u,v). The required orders are at least (j−m)/2(j-m)/2 and j−mj-m, respectively; the latter implies the former. This gives (15.3).

We justify asymptotic completeness, including the birationality needed in passing to the image. For rational 1<t<21<t<2, write Pt=(2−t)P1+(t−1)P2P_t=(2-t)P_1+(t-1)P_2. The divisors P1P_1 and 2P22P_2 are globally generated by Proposition 15.3. The complete linear jets in Lemma 14.2 show that the morphism of P1P_1 restricts on G̃\widetilde G to a map recovering its blow-down to G≅ℙ2G\cong\mathbb P^2. It is therefore birational on G̃\widetilde G.

Choose an integer d>0d>0 with dPt=aP1+b(2P2)dP_t=aP_1+b(2P_2) for positive integers a,ba,b. Products of endpoint sections give a subsystem of |dPt||dP_t|. On a dense open subset of G̃\widetilde G, ratios of these products recover the ratios of the sections of aP1aP_1. Hence the morphism of dPtdP_t is also birational on G̃\widetilde G. Take its Stein factorization ψ:Y2→V\psi:Y_2\to V, with dPt=ψ*AVdP_t=\psi^*A_V for an ample line bundle AVA_V, and let SV=ψ(G̃)S_V=\psi(\widetilde G) have its reduced structure. Restriction from H0(V,nAV)H^0(V,nA_V) to H0(SV,nAV|SV)H^0(S_V,nA_V|_{S_V}) is surjective for large nn. Since ψ|G̃\psi|_{\widetilde G} is birational, the cokernel of 𝒪SV→(ψ|G̃)*𝒪G̃\mathcal O_{S_V}\longrightarrow(\psi|_{\widetilde G})_*\mathcal O_{\widetilde G} is supported in dimension at most one. Twisting by nAVnA_V shows that the deficit of the restricted series inside H0(G̃,ndPt|G̃)H^0(\widetilde G,ndP_t|_{\widetilde G}) is O(n)O(n). This is asymptotic completeness in a surface summand. Squaring the nef restricted class gives the stated volume, also equal to −13ddtvol(Dt)-\frac13\frac{d}{dt}\mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(D_t). ◻

Corollary 15.5 (A uniform improvement). For p∈f0p\in f_0 on a smooth conic fibre, SX(G)≤233112<273128,βX(G)≥103112,δp(X)≥min{336233,δ(G;W)}.S_X(G)\le\frac{233}{112}<\frac{273}{128},\qquad \beta_X(G)\ge\frac{103}{112},\qquad \delta_p(X)\ge\min\left\{\frac{336}{233},\delta(G;W)\right\}.

Proof. Put V(t)=vol(Dt)V(t)=\mathop{\mathrm{vol}}(D_t). The proven chambers give ∫02V(t)dt=2258,V(2)=172,V′−(2)=−212.\int_0^2V(t)\,dt=\frac{225}{8},\qquad V(2)=\frac{17}{2},\qquad V'_-(2)=-\frac{21}{2}. The function V1/3V^{1/3} is concave on the big interval; see [5, Section 2.4]. Its left tangent at 22 therefore gives V(t)≤172(1−717(t−2))3while Dt is big and t≥2.V(t)\le\frac{17}{2}\left(1-\frac7{17}(t-2)\right)^3 \quad\text{while }D_t\text{ is big and }t\ge2. In particular, the big interval ends no later than 31/731/7, and ∫2∞V(t)dt≤28956,SX(G)≤116(2258+28956)=233112.\int_2^\infty V(t)\,dt\le\frac{289}{56},\qquad S_X(G)\le\frac1{16}\left(\frac{225}{8}+\frac{289}{56}\right)=\frac{233}{112}. The other assertions follow from AX(G)=3A_X(G)=3 and Lemma 14.1. This argument uses concavity only for the unresolved tail; it does not pretend that the first chamber continues past t=2t=2. ◻