Section 15
Blowing up the first base curve
We now compute a genuine Zariski decomposition on a modification of the threefold. Throughout this section, and the conic is smooth. There is no transversality assumption on . Put on , and let be the strict transform of . In formulas on further models, denote pullbacks; the centres below meet properly, so its pullback is also its strict transform.
Lemma 15.1 (Two successive curve blow-ups). One has . Blow up , obtaining with exceptional surface . Its negative section has . Blow up , obtaining , with exceptional surface . Write for the strict transform of and . Then , and, writing for its negative section and for a ruling fibre, The first factor of maps isomorphically to .
Proof. The fibre in has normal bundle in : its normal bundle in is trivial, , and the normal sequence splits. Blowing up one point of the curve twists both normal summands by . Thus . On its normal bundle has class . Restriction to has degree , as does . The normal sequence splits, giving .
Blowing up a Cartier curve on leaves that surface unchanged and subtracts from its normal bundle. This gives and . The other two formulas follow from : and , so . ◻
Lemma 15.2 (A globally generated divisor). On , the divisor is globally generated. The strict transform of is disjoint from .
Proof. Let be the plane of the conic . It contains , and the normal direction represented by lies in . Choose affine linear coordinates at such that , , and the selected normal direction has . Locally has equations , , with . A chart of at is Here and .
Consider the quadrics spanned by times all linear forms, together with . Their base locus in is just . On the displayed chart their ideal is Blowing up extracts a factor of order two. The only remaining base locus is in the -chart, where the residual ideal is . Blowing up extracts one copy of and leaves the ideal of its negative section. Blowing up that section resolves the ideal. The total exceptional factor is . The same computation along the rest of uses ; there are no other base points. This proves global generation.
Finally, is an isomorphism to a line. Hence differs from the tangent direction of the fibre . The two strict transforms are disjoint after blowing up , and all subsequent centres lie over . ◻
Proposition 15.3 (The first non-nef chamber). For , put . Then (15.1) is a Zariski decomposition in the following explicit sense: is nef and, for sufficiently divisible , multiplication by the defining section of identifies with . Moreover, (15.2)
Proof. First prove that the displayed coefficients are forced. Let an effective divisor numerically equivalent to have coefficients along , respectively, and remove those components. Its restrictions to and are effective and have classes The effective cones of and give and . This proves the fixed-part assertion once nefness is established.
The divisor is globally generated. At the other endpoint, The system has base locus exactly the strict transform of . Indeed, it comes from lines through , and the fibre is smooth. It therefore has nonnegative intersection with every curve other than . Lemma 15.2 gives the same assertion for , and , . Thus and is nef. Since , every is nef.
For later use, is in fact globally generated. Products from and generate it off . To cover , choose a plane section whose restriction to vanishes exactly at . Its differential annihilates . Since is smooth at , a section of vanishing at has the same differential, after choosing nonvanishing local frames. Subtracting the corresponding products gives a global section of vanishing to order two at whose strict transform does not vanish anywhere on . Its square, after removing , supplies the missing section of .
For divisible , the forced coefficients show that every section of is divisible by . Conversely, multiplying any section of gives a section of . As is nef, the volume is .
Here is the cubic calculation. On the first blow-up, , , and . Subtracting changes the cube by . Its intersection with is . On blowing up , subtracting changes the cube by . The total change is , proving (15.2). ◻
Lemma 15.4 (The resolved jets on the exceptional plane). The strict transform is obtained from by blowing up and then a point on the first exceptional curve. Write for the total-transform plane and exceptional classes. Then For , the moving restricted series is asymptotically complete. In affine coordinates at , with specifying the direction , its pushforward consists asymptotically of degree- forms satisfying the weighted base condition (15.3) Its restricted volume is .
Proof. The two threefold centres meet the transform of transversely at . On the final surface, and . This proves the class formulas. The exceptional valuations of the two surface blow-ups have weights and in . The required orders are at least and , respectively; the latter implies the former. This gives (15.3).
We justify asymptotic completeness, including the birationality needed in passing to the image. For rational , write . The divisors and are globally generated by Proposition 15.3. The complete linear jets in Lemma 14.2 show that the morphism of restricts on to a map recovering its blow-down to . It is therefore birational on .
Choose an integer with for positive integers . Products of endpoint sections give a subsystem of . On a dense open subset of , ratios of these products recover the ratios of the sections of . Hence the morphism of is also birational on . Take its Stein factorization , with for an ample line bundle , and let have its reduced structure. Restriction from to is surjective for large . Since is birational, the cokernel of is supported in dimension at most one. Twisting by shows that the deficit of the restricted series inside is . This is asymptotic completeness in a surface summand. Squaring the nef restricted class gives the stated volume, also equal to . ◻
Corollary 15.5 (A uniform improvement). For on a smooth conic fibre,
Proof. Put . The proven chambers give The function is concave on the big interval; see [5, Section 2.4]. Its left tangent at therefore gives In particular, the big interval ends no later than , and The other assertions follow from and Lemma 14.1. This argument uses concavity only for the unresolved tail; it does not pretend that the first chamber continues past . ◻