Text size

Section 126

The joining line of a fibre of type (2,2)

Suppose a fibre has two ramification points of index two. Let Γ\Gamma be its joining line. Its endpoints are the two A1A_1 points of the fibre. We treat the remaining points by extracting the whole curve with weights (1,2)(1,2) in its normal directions.

Theorem 126.1. For every point p∈Γp\in\Gamma different from its endpoints, δp(X)≥72/67\delta_p(X)\ge72/67.

Lemma 126.2 (The exceptional pair). The weighted extraction has discrepancy three. Its exceptional pair is (G,Δ)=(ℙ1×ℙ1,12D),(G,\Delta)=\left(\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1,\frac12D\right), where DD is a smooth curve of bidegree (2,1)(2,1).

Proof. Write the conic and graph as q=UV−x2=0,F=vx2+uG(U,x,V)=0,q=UV-x^2=0,\qquad F=vx^2+uG(U,x,V)=0, with [u:v][u:v] the target coordinates. Put G0(U,V)=G(U,0,V)G_0(U,V)=G(U,0,V). Its coefficients of U2U^2 and V2V^2 are nonzero, since the graph has no base point at either ramification point. The joining line is the strict transform of u=x=0u=x=0.

Let ee define the exceptional divisor of the original blow-up, and let s1=q/es_1=q/e, s2=F/es_2=F/e. These are global sections of classes EE, 2H−E2H-E, T+2H−ET+2H-E, respectively, satisfying es1=UV−x2,es2=vx2+uG(U,x,V).es_1=UV-x^2,\qquad es_2=vx^2+uG(U,x,V). Give u,x,s2u,x,s_2 weights 2,1,22,1,2, and all other displayed sections weight zero. These weights agree with the transverse valuation at the generic point of Γ\Gamma. Their initial identities are es1=UV,es2=vx2+uG0(U,V).es_1=UV,\qquad es_2=vx^2+uG_0(U,V). We shall identify the entire refined series by an exact dimension count below; no assertion about generators of the whole Cox ring is needed.

Along Γ\Gamma, the sections vv and s1s_1 are units. Set both equal to one, so e=UVe=UV, and write t=ut=u, a=s2a=s_2. The exceptional weighted directions satisfy x2=UVa−tG0(U,V),x^2=UVa-tG_0(U,V), with weights 1,2,21,2,2 on x,a,tx,a,t. Their coarse surface is G=ℙU,V1×ℙa,t1G=\mathbb P^1_{U,V}\times\mathbb P^1_{a,t}. The generic index two along x=0x=0 gives the different D/2D/2, where D=(UVa−tG0(U,V)=0).D=(UVa-tG_0(U,V)=0). The polynomials UVUV and G0G_0 have no common zero, so DD is the graph of a morphism of degree two and is smooth. On the open part of Γ\Gamma, the normal coordinates are x,ux,u; at the endpoints one uses x,s2x,s_2. Both descriptions give weights (1,2)(1,2) and log discrepancy three. ◻

Put T0=(t=0)T_0=(t=0), and let P,QP,Q be the two points of D∩T0D\cap T_0. They lie over the two endpoints of Γ\Gamma.

Lemma 126.3 (The complete refined spaces). Write j=2K+εj=2K+\varepsilon, where ε∈{0,1}\varepsilon\in\{0,1\}, and put n=m−ε,h=max(0,K−2m),d=n−2h,e0=K−h,k=max(0,K−m)−h.n=m-\varepsilon,\quad h=\max(0,K-2m),\quad d=n-2h,\quad e_0=K-h,\quad k=\max(0,K-m)-h. The actual weight-jj piece of the refined anticanonical series is xε(UVa−tG0)hH0(G,𝒪(d,e0)⊗ℐPkℐQk).x^\varepsilon (UVa-tG_0)^h H^0\bigl(G,\mathcal O(d,e_0)\otimes \mathcal I_P^k\mathcal I_Q^k\bigr). It is zero when d<0d<0. The factor xεx^\varepsilon records the fractional fixed divisor εD/2\varepsilon D/2 on the coarse surface.

Proof. Products of the global sections in the preceding proof of class m(2T+3H−E)m(2T+3H-E), after setting v=s1=1v=s_1=1, have initial forms (UV)αxℓtiacH0(ℙ1,𝒪(m−2α−ℓ)),(UV)^\alpha x^\ell t^i a^c H^0(\mathbb P^1,\mathcal O(m-2\alpha-\ell)), where c≤m+αc\le m+\alpha, i+c≤2mi+c\le2m and ℓ≤m−2α\ell\le m-2\alpha. These statements follow directly by comparing the three divisor classes of the monomial. Write ℓ=ε+2r\ell=\varepsilon+2r and replace x2rx^{2r} by (UVa−tG0)r(UVa-tG_0)^r. Then K=i+c+rK=i+c+r.

First suppose K≤2mK\le2m. Terms with r=0r=0 already span the space in the statement. To see this, expand a section of 𝒪(n,K)\mathcal O(n,K) as ∑ifi(U,V)aK−iti.\sum_i f_i(U,V)a^{K-i}t^i. Vanishing to order kk at both P,QP,Q is equivalent to divisibility of fif_i by (UV)max(k−i,0)(UV)^{\max(k-i,0)}. This is precisely the inequality c≤m+αc\le m+\alpha above. Every term with r>0r>0 satisfies the same vanishing condition and adds nothing outside this space.

If K>2mK>2m, the inequality i+c≤2mi+c\le2m forces r≥K−2m=hr\ge K-2m=h. Remove the common factor (UVa−tG0)h(UVa-tG_0)^h. The remaining fibre degree is 2m2m, the base degree is n−2hn-2h, and the required vanishing at both points is mm. The preceding argument applies again. Thus the displayed space is contained in the actual refined piece. We check equality by counting dimensions in all degrees.

For d,e0≥0d,e_0\ge0 and e0≥ke_0\ge k, the binary expansion used above gives h0(𝒪(d,e0)⊗ℐPkℐQk)=(d+1)(e0−k+1)+r(d−r),r=min(k,⌊d/2⌋).h^0(\mathcal O(d,e_0)\otimes\mathcal I_P^k\mathcal I_Q^k) =(d+1)(e_0-k+1)+r(d-r),\qquad r=\min(k,\lfloor d/2\rfloor). Combine the two parity rows, and put n=⌊m/2⌋n=\lfloor m/2\rfloor. Their dimensions at fixed KK are 0≤K≤m(2m+1)(K+1)K=m+k,1≤k≤m(2m+1)(m+1)+r(2m−1−2r),r=min(k,n)K=2m+h,1≤h≤n(2d+1)(m+1)+d(d−1)/2,d=m−2h.\begin{array}{c|c} 0\le K\le m &(2m+1)(K+1)\\ K=m+k,\ 1\le k\le m &(2m+1)(m+1)+r(2m-1-2r),\quad r=\min(k,n)\\ K=2m+h,\ 1\le h\le n &(2d+1)(m+1)+d(d-1)/2,\quad d=m-2h. \end{array} Summing the three rows gives (2m+1)(2m2+2m+1)(2m+1)(2m^2+2m+1), as one checks separately for m=2nm=2n and m=2n+1m=2n+1. Riemann–Roch and Kodaira vanishing give the same value for h0(X,−mKX)h^0(X,-mK_X). Since associated graded spaces preserve dimension, all the inclusions are equalities. ◻

Let π:S→G\pi:S\to G blow up P,QP,Q. Denote the exceptional curves by E1,E2E_1,E_2, and use B,TB,T for the pullbacks of the two fibre classes, with BB a fibre of the projection to Γ\Gamma. Put C=T−E1−E2,D̃=2B+T−E1−E2.C=T-E_1-E_2,\qquad \widetilde D=2B+T-E_1-E_2. The curve CC has self-intersection −2-2. The other negative curves are E1,E2,B−E1,B−E2E_1,E_2,B-E_1,B-E_2; these five curves generate the effective cone. This also follows by applying the plane model of the blow-up of a quadric at two points on the same ruling line.

Lemma 126.4 (The first moment). For the weighted extraction, SX(G)=67/24S_X(G)=67/24.

Proof. Put u=K/mu=K/m. The limiting fixed divisor is hD̃h\widetilde D, and the remaining class is Lu=dB+eT−k(E1+E2)L_u=dB+eT-k(E_1+E_2), with udekh[0,1]1u00[1,2]1uu−10[2,5/2]5−2u21u−2.\begin{array}{c|cccc} u&d&e&k&h\\ \hline {[0,1]}&1&u&0&0\\ {[1,2]}&1&u&u-1&0\\ {[2,5/2]}&5-2u&2&1&u-2. \end{array} Its negative part is rCrC, where r=max(0,k−d/2)r=\max(0,k-d/2), and its positive part has square V(u)=2de−2k2+2r2.V(u)=2de-2k^2+2r^2. Indeed its intersections with EiE_i, B−EiB-E_i and CC are k−rk-r, e−ke-k and d−2k+2rd-2k+2r, respectively, and are nonnegative.

There are two parity rows in Lemma 126.3. Their leading terms agree, and ∫05/2V(u)du=4,\int_0^{5/2}V(u)\,du=4, which agrees with h0(X,−mKX)=4m3+O(m2)h^0(X,-mK_X)=4m^3+O(m^2). The weight divided by mm is 2u2u. Consequently SX(G)=14∫05/22uV(u)du=6724.S_X(G)=\frac14\int_0^{5/2}2uV(u)\,du=\frac{67}{24}. All contributions of the parity factor are of lower order. ◻

Lemma 126.5 (Points outside the different). Let q∈Gq\in G lie over an interior point of Γ\Gamma, and suppose q∉Dq\notin D. Then δq(G,Δ;WG)≥6/5\delta_q(G,\Delta;W^G)\ge6/5.

Proof. Use the fibre F=BF=B through qq. It avoids P,QP,Q. Subtract vFvF from LuL_u, and write b=d−vb=d-v, with 0≤b≤d0\le b\le d. Its negative part is rbCr_bC, where rb=max(0,k−b/2)r_b=\max(0,k-b/2). The positive square and its degree on FF are VF=2be−2k2+2rb2,l=e−rb.V_F=2be-2k^2+2r_b^2,\qquad l=e-r_b. The fixed divisor restricted to FF is rb(F∩T0)+h(F∩D)r_b(F\cap T_0)+h(F\cap D). These two points are distinct. Therefore S(WG;F)=14∫∫0dVFdbdu=1124.S(W^G;F)=\frac14\int\!\int_0^d V_F\,db\,du=\frac{11}{24}. At a point outside DD, the subsequent point moment is bounded by 12∫∫0dl(nq+l2)dbdu,\frac12\int\!\int_0^d l\left(n_q+\frac l2\right)db\,du, where nq=rbn_q=r_b at F∩T0F\cap T_0 and is zero otherwise. These integrals are 5/65/6 and 69/12869/128, respectively. For clarity, the chamber contributions, with the normalizing factors included, are ubS(WG;F)nq=0nq=rb[0,1][0,1]1/81/121/12[1,3/2][0,2u−2]3/6411/1287/64[1,3/2][2u−2,1]3/3211/12811/128[3/2,2][0,1]7/4819/9667/192[2,5/2][0,5−2u]3/6411/12879/384.\begin{array}{c|c|ccc} u&b&S(W^G;F)&n_q=0&n_q=r_b\\ \hline {[0,1]}&[0,1]&1/8&1/12&1/12\\ {[1,3/2]}&[0,2u-2]&3/64&11/128&7/64\\ {[1,3/2]}&[2u-2,1]&3/32&11/128&11/128\\ {[3/2,2]}&[0,1]&7/48&19/96&67/192\\ {[2,5/2]}&[0,5-2u]&3/64&11/128&79/384. \end{array} The point bounds follow by replacing the restricted series by the complete series of its degree; this gives an upper bound for its maximal total vanishing. Boundary and rounding terms have lower order. Since FF has log discrepancy one and Δ|F\Delta|_F has no support at qq, the surface flag inequality gives δq(G,Δ;WG)≥min{24/11,6/5,128/69}=6/5.\delta_q(G,\Delta;W^G)\ge \min\{24/11,6/5,128/69\}=6/5. ◻

Lemma 126.6 (Points on the different). For q∈D\{P,Q}q\in D\setminus\{P,Q\} one has δq(G,Δ;WG)≥192/175\delta_q(G,\Delta;W^G)\ge192/175.

Proof. Use DD as the first member of the flag. Its log discrepancy is 1/21/2, and its adjoint boundary is zero. Set τ=min(d/2,e)\tau=\min(d/2,e). For 0≤v≤min(k,τ)0\le v\le\min(k,\tau), the negative part of Lu−vD̃L_u-v\widetilde D remains rCrC, since D̃⋅C=0\widetilde D\cdot C=0. Its positive square and degree on D̃\widetilde D are VD=2(d−2v)(e−v)−2(k−v)2+2r2,lD=d+2e−2k−4v.V_D=2(d-2v)(e-v)-2(k-v)^2+2r^2,\qquad l_D=d+2e-2k-4v. If k≤v≤τk\le v\le\tau, which is possible only when r=0r=0, the negative part is (v−k)(E1+E2)(v-k)(E_1+E_2), and VD=2(d−2v)(e−v),lD=d+2e−4v.V_D=2(d-2v)(e-v),\qquad l_D=d+2e-4v. The positive parts are nef by the intersections with the five negative curves listed above. The threshold is τ\tau; at its endpoint the positive part has square zero, and beyond it a nef ruling class has negative intersection.

The negative curves meet D̃\widetilde D only at P,QP,Q, with CC disjoint from D̃\widetilde D. Thus there is no fixed point contribution at qq. The first moment and the following point moment satisfy S(WG;D)=14∫(hV(u)+∫0τVDdv)du=1148,S(W^G;D)=\frac14\int\left(hV(u)+\int_0^\tau V_D\,dv\right)du =\frac{11}{48}, S(WG,D;q)≤14∫∫0τlD2dvdu=175192.S(W^{G,D};q)\le\frac14\int\!\int_0^\tau l_D^2\,dv\,du =\frac{175}{192}. Here are the integrations, including the factor 1/41/4: uv∫VD/4∫lD2/4[0,1/2][0,u]1/1287/192[1/2,1][0,1/2]7/1921/6[1,3/2][0,u−1]3/6417/96[1,3/2][u−1,1/2]7/38425/192[3/2,2][0,1/2]7/9613/48[2,5/2][0,(5−2u)/2]3/12825/192.\begin{array}{c|c|cc} u&v&\int V_D/4&\int l_D^2/4\\ \hline {[0,1/2]}&[0,u]&1/128&7/192\\ {[1/2,1]}&[0,1/2]&7/192&1/6\\ {[1,3/2]}&[0,u-1]&3/64&17/96\\ {[1,3/2]}&[u-1,1/2]&7/384&25/192\\ {[3/2,2]}&[0,1/2]&7/96&13/48\\ {[2,5/2]}&[0,(5-2u)/2]&3/128&25/192. \end{array} The fixed contribution 14∫hV(u)du\frac14\int hV(u)\,du is 3/1283/128. The complete restricted series again bounds the point moment from above. Applying the flag inequality gives δq(G,Δ;WG)≥min{1/211/48,192175}=192175.\delta_q(G,\Delta;W^G)\ge \min\left\{\frac{1/2}{11/48},\frac{192}{175}\right\} =\frac{192}{175}. ◻

Proof of Theorem 126.1. Every point of GG above pp is covered by one of the preceding two lemmas. Abban–Zhuang adjunction for the weighted curve extraction therefore gives δp(X)≥min{367/24,192175}=7267>1.\delta_p(X)\ge \min\left\{\frac{3}{67/24},\frac{192}{175}\right\} =\frac{72}{67}>1. We have not computed a Zariski decomposition on the weighted extracted threefold. The actual refined spaces were identified from its graded section algebra. All divisor decompositions used afterwards are on the explicitly described surface SS. ◻