Part XIII · Family 3.5: K-semistability and the complete smooth classificationPDF page 307
We first compute two expected vanishing orders on the original
threefold. These calculations also fix the normalizations used
later.
Lemma 90.1. The divisor
is globally generated. The positive and fixed parts of
are
For
they are
The displayed positive parts
are nef; the respective pseudoeffective thresholds are
and
.
Proof. The ideal of
is generated, after twisting by
,
by the equation of
times sections of
and by two lifts of
and
from
.
This proves the assertion about
.
All the proposed positive parts are nonnegative linear combinations of
,
,
and
.
In the first table, the first interval interpolates between
and
.
For
,
restriction to a fibre of
forces the component
.
After its removal, the remaining divisor is the pullback written in the
table, and has no fixed divisorial component.
In the second table,
restricts to
on
.
For
,
its negative degree on the appropriate ruling forces multiplicity at
least
along
,
because
.
Removing this multiplicity gives
,
which is globally generated when its coefficients are integral. The same
conclusions for rational and real coefficients follow by taking
multiples and continuity. Finally, beyond the stated thresholds the
pushforward to
has a negative coefficient of
,
respectively
,
and cannot be effective. ◻
Lemma 90.2 (Separate computations of
and
).
One has
Proof. For the first divisor, the intersection identities
give
Consequently
For the fibre divisor, the two volume polynomials are
Thus
Both computations use volume on
,
not on a weighted extraction. ◻
Lemma 90.3 (Points on the distinguished surface).
For every
,
one has
.
Proof. Take the ruling
through
.
On
,
the moving parts in Lemma 90.1 have
classes
The fixed restriction in the second interval is
.
The volume of
is
when
.
The first refinement therefore gives
For the flag
the moving contribution is
Since
is an isomorphism,
meets
transversely once. The fixed contribution is zero for
,
and otherwise equals
All discrepancies in this
smooth surface flag are one. The flag inequality, together with Lemma 90.2, now gives
This reproduces [3, Lemma 5.68] with the two restriction integrals
and the fixed contribution written separately. ◻
Lemma 90.4 (Smooth fibres). If
lies on a smooth fibre
,
then
.
More precisely, the bound is
on
,
and at least
away from
.
Proof. Only
remains. Set
.
The moving restrictions are
for
and
for
;
the fixed restrictions are supported on
.
For any divisor
over
whose centre contains
,
the fixed contribution is zero. Monotonicity of volume gives
A smooth quartic del
Pezzo surface satisfies
[3, Lemma 2.12]. Hence
.
The first refinement has expected order
,
so the Abban–Zhuang inequality yields
◻