Text size

Section 93

Weighted point extractions and their exact first moments

Lemma 93.1 (The local extraction). At a ramification point of index rr, a neighbourhood of the unique singular point pp of the corresponding fibre over that point has regular coordinates x,z,wx,z,w on XX in which t=zw+cxr+O(xr+1),c≠0.t=zw+c x^r+O(x^{r+1}),\qquad c\ne0. The fibre has type Ar−1A_{r-1} there. For r=3,4,5r=3,4,5, the weighted blow-up with weights (1,2,r−2)(1,2,r-2) has exceptional divisor GG and AX(G)=r+1.A_X(G)=r+1. Its exceptional pair is ℙ(1,2,1)\mathbb P(1,2,1) with zero different when r=3r=3, (ℙ2,12Λ)(\mathbb P^2,\tfrac12\Lambda), where Λ\Lambda is a line, when r=4r=4, and ℙ(1,2,3)\mathbb P(1,2,3) with zero different when r=5r=5.

Proof. On MM, take z=0z=0 as a local equation of SS, and write the graph as t=φ(x)t=\varphi(x). The ideal of CC is (z,t−φ(x))(z,t-\varphi(x)). The blow-up chart containing pp is t−φ(x)=zwt-\varphi(x)=zw. The other chart contains the strict transform of SS and shows that D∩TD\cap T avoids the singularity. The formula for tt proves the singularity assertion. The discrepancy of a primitive weighted blow-up of three regular parameters is the sum of its weights. Weighted adjunction gives the claimed pairs. For weights (1,2,2)(1,2,2), passing to the second Veronese identifies the coarse exceptional surface with ℙ2\mathbb P^2; the generic index two along x=0x=0 contributes the different Λ/2\Lambda/2. It cannot be discarded in a stability calculation. ◻

Lemma 93.2 (Exact expected order of the point extraction). For the extraction in Lemma 93.1, one has SX(G)=91r+2580,βX(G)=11(5−r)80.S_X(G)=\frac{91r+25}{80},\qquad \beta_X(G)=\frac{11(5-r)}{80}. In particular, the expected orders are 149/40149/40, 389/80389/80 and 66 for r=3r=3, r=4r=4 and r=5r=5, respectively.

Proof. Choose the ramification point at [x:y]=[0:1][x:y]=[0:1] and its image at [u:v]=[1:0][u:v]=[1:0]. After scaling, write f=xry5−r+∑i>raixiy5−i,g=y5+∑i≥1bixiy5−i.f=x^r y^{5-r}+\sum_{i>r}a_i x^i y^{5-i},\qquad g=y^5+\sum_{i\ge1}b_i x^i y^{5-i}. Scaling xx with weight one and vv with weight rr, and dividing the equation by its least weight, gives a flat family of centres whose central member is C*:uxry5−r+vy5=0.C_*:\quad u x^r y^{5-r}+v y^5=0. For r<5r<5, it is important to use this possibly nonreduced centre, rather than to cancel its factor y5−ry^{5-r}. Cancellation would change the Hilbert function and the expected order.

Here are the flatness and section-space details. The centres are relative Cartier divisors on the fixed smooth surface SS, hence relative local complete intersections in MM. Their ideals and all their powers have flat quotients over the parameter, as follows inductively from Ia/Ia+1=Syma(I/I2)I^a/I^{a+1}=\operatorname{Sym}^a(I/I^2). Thus their blow-ups form a flat family. The central blow-up X*X_* is normal. Near the multiple component its only new local equations have the form ab=s5−rcab=s^{5-r}c, or ab=s5−rab=s^{5-r} with a unit suppressed. For r=3,4r=3,4 these are canonical threefold hypersurfaces, and in particular are klt.

For r=5r=5 the central centre is smooth and so is its blow-up. The divisor BB remains globally generated by the same ideal generators as in Lemma 90.1. The fibres over ℙ1\mathbb P^1 are blow-ups of curvilinear length-five subschemes of the smooth conic. Their minimal resolutions are the successive blow-ups along that conic. A plane curve of degree dd distinct from the conic has sum of multiplicities along these clusters at most 2d2d, by Bézout, and hence has anticanonical degree at least dd. The conic itself has anticanonical degree one. The only curves of degree zero are the exceptional (−2)(-2)-chains, already contracted in X*X_*. Consequently LL is ample on each fibre. Since L=T+BL=T+B is nef, its morphism contracts no curve: a contracted curve would have TT-degree zero and lie in a fibre. Hence LL is ample on X*X_*. Vanishing and base change identify the anticanonical section spaces of this flat family.

At the section pp of the family, the central blow-up is smooth and the action on its regular parameters has weights (1,2,r−2)(1,2,r-2). Choose the anticanonical linearization of weight zero at pp. The weighted rescaling is precisely the local Rees construction for these parameters. Thus the central weight spaces identify with the actual associated graded section spaces at GG. Indeed, a nonzero homogeneous central section restricts to a nonzero weighted homogeneous polynomial on this affine chart. It cannot have higher order than its weight. A weight basis lifted by base change therefore has independent initial forms and exhausts the original section space. This also rules out unaccounted cancellations.

We can now count the characters by a second, independent filtration, namely order along the strict transform D*D_*. Its defining section has weight zero: it is the quotient of the conic equation, of weight two, by the exceptional equation, also of weight two. For 0≤j≤m0\le j\le m, the jjth quotient is the complete space H0(D*,𝒪(m+j,m+j)).H^0(D_*,\mathcal O(m+j,m+j)). Completeness follows from vanishing for (m+1)L−(j+1)D*(m+1)L-(j+1)D_*, which is nef and big. Its dimension is (m+j+1)2(m+j+1)^2. In the chosen linearization, a monomial of target degree ii and source degree kk has weight (m−j)(r−2)+ri+k,0≤i,k≤m+j.(m-j)(r-2)+ri+k,\qquad 0\le i,k\le m+j. The character shift r−2r-2 comes from E|D*=C*E|_{D_*}=C_*: the equation of C*C_* has weight rr, whereas the exceptional equation at pp has weight two. The mean weight of this quotient is therefore (3r−3)m+(5−r)j2.\frac{(3r-3)m+(5-r)j}{2}.

For m<j≤⌊3m/2⌋m<j\le\lfloor3m/2\rfloor, the exact fixed factor is Ej−mE^{j-m}. After removing it, sections are pulled back from 𝒪M(2m,3m−2j)\mathcal O_M(2m,3m-2j). Restriction to the conic is surjective, so the quotient has dimension (2m+1)(6m−4j+1).(2m+1)(6m-4j+1). Its mean weight, including the fixed exceptional factor, is rm+6m−4j2+2(j−m)=(r+1)m.rm+\frac{6m-4j}{2}+2(j-m)=(r+1)m. There are no further quotients. This is an exact finite-level description, not a count of an ambient space containing the sections. In particular their dimensions sum to h0(X,mL)=10m3+15m2+11m+33.h^0(X,mL)=\frac{10m^3+15m^2+11m+3}{3}.

Dividing the total character sum by mh0(X,mL)m h^0(X,mL) and taking the limit gives SX(G)=310[∫01(1+s)2(3r−3)+(5−r)s2ds+∫13/2(12−8s)(r+1)ds]=31091r+2524=91r+2580.\begin{aligned} S_X(G) &=\frac3{10}\left[ \int_0^1(1+s)^2\, \frac{(3r-3)+(5-r)s}{2}\,ds +\int_1^{3/2}(12-8s)(r+1)\,ds\right]\\ &=\frac3{10}\,\frac{91r+25}{24} =\frac{91r+25}{80}. \end{aligned} Subtracting from AX(G)=r+1A_X(G)=r+1 proves the beta formula. No Zariski decomposition on the weighted extracted threefold has been computed or assumed. The weighted expected order is obtained from the actual graded sections. The divisor decompositions used to count them are on the central blow-up of MM and on its distinguished surface; these are separate from the weighted extraction at pp. ◻

Example 93.3 (Checking the normalization at m=1m=1). The filtration in the preceding proof has two quotients, of dimensions four and nine. Their mean weights are 3(r−1)/23(r-1)/2 and r+1r+1. Thus h0(X,L)=13h^0(X,L)=13, and the total weights are 4848 for r=3r=3 and 6363 for r=4r=4. These finite-level ratios 48/1348/13 and 63/1363/13 are not the asymptotic invariants; their limits over all multiples are 149/40149/40 and 389/80389/80. At an A2A_2 point, the independently computed numbers also satisfy 3⋅6980+9180=14940.3\cdot\frac{69}{80}+\frac{91}{80}=\frac{149}{40}. For r=5r=5, the character calculation gives SX(G)=AX(G)=6S_X(G)=A_X(G)=6, consistent with the strictly K-semistable examples above.