Text size

Section 100

The point extraction at an interior point

Let pp be a point of the joining line Γ\Gamma different from its A2A_2 and A1A_1 endpoints. We use the ordinary blow-up of pp; its exceptional divisor is again G=ℙ2G=\mathbb P^2 with zero different.

Theorem 100.1. At every such point one has SX(G)=94,δ(G;WG)≥3229,δp(X)≥3229>1.S_X(G)=\frac94,\qquad \delta(G;W^G)\ge\frac{32}{29}, \qquad\delta_p(X)\ge\frac{32}{29}>1.

Lemma 100.2 (The initial algebra at an interior point). There are homogeneous coordinates [x:z:t][x:z:t] on GG and a second one-parameter degeneration of its refined series whose algebra contains the degree-one sections ti{1,x,z}(0≤i≤2),x2,tx2,F,tF,F=x3+tz2.t^i\{1,x,z\}\quad(0\le i\le2),\qquad x^2,tx^2,F,tF, \qquad F=x^3+tz^2. The primary degree is ordinary polynomial degree in x,z,tx,z,t; the auxiliary torus weights are (1,0,3)(1,0,3).

Proof. As at the index-two endpoint, write the graph as ux2y3+vg=0ux^2y^3+vg=0, with g0=1g_0=1, g5≠0g_5\ne0, and use the cubic lifts G0,G1G_0,G_1 and R(c)R(c) of Lemma 98.2. Since pp lies on the open part of Γ\Gamma, it has t=x=0t=x=0 and c≠0,∞c\ne0,\infty. A source scaling allows us to put c(p)=1c(p)=1. Put z=c−1z=c-1. The conic equation q=c−x2=1+z−x2q=c-x^2=1+z-x^2 is a unit near pp, so the blow-up is an isomorphism there. Trivializing LL by this conic section gives the thirteen regular local functions ti{1,x,c}(0≤i≤2),A,B,tA,tB,t^i\{1,x,c\}\quad(0\le i\le2),\qquad A,B,tA,tB, where A=c+tG0q,B=xA+tR(c).A=\frac{c+tG_0}{q},\qquad B=xA+tR(c). Put a=1+g2+g4,b=g1+g3+g5,e=g4−1,d=g3+2g5.a=1+g_2+g_4,\qquad b=g_1+g_3+g_5,\qquad e=g_4-1,\qquad d=g_3+2g_5. The first-order Taylor expansion of G0/qG_0/q at pp is a+bx+eza+bx+ez. Thus U=A−1−at−btx−etzU=A-1-at-btx-etz has initial form x2x^2. The function V=B−x−bt−dtz−atxV=B-x-bt-dtz-atx satisfies the exact identity V=xU+btx2+etxz+g5tz2.V=xU+btx^2+etxz+g_5tz^2. Consequently its primary initial form is F′=x3+t(bx2+exz+g5z2).F'=x^3+t(bx^2+exz+g_5z^2). The functions tUtU and tVtV are still linear combinations of the thirteen sections, since their definitions only require subtracting t2,t2x,t2zt^2,t^2x,t^2z from tA,tBtA,tB. Their initial forms are tx2tx^2 and tF′tF'. The nine other initial sections are ti{1,x,z}t^i\{1,x,z\}.

Now take least auxiliary weights (1,0,3)(1,0,3) in (x,z,t)(x,z,t). The two terms btx2btx^2 and etxzetxz have weights five and four, whereas x3x^3 and g5tz2g_5tz^2 have weight three. Hence the new initial forms of F′,tF′F',tF' are x3+g5tz2x^3+g_5tz^2 and t(x3+g5tz2)t(x^3+g_5tz^2). Since g5≠0g_5\ne0, a scaling makes its coefficient one. This proves the claimed inclusion, directly from actual sections on XX. ◻

Lemma 100.3 (Normal monomials and the Hilbert count). The degree-mm space of this algebra has basis xazbFcts,x^az^bF^ct^s, where all four exponents are nonnegative integers and (I.1)(s=0orb≤1),a+2b+2c≤2m,s+c≤2m,s+a+b+2c≤3m.(s=0\ \text{or}\ b\le1),\qquad a+2b+2c\le2m,\qquad s+c\le2m,\qquad s+a+b+2c\le3m. \tag{I.1} Its dimension is NmN_m. It is therefore the whole secondary initial algebra of the actual refinement.

Proof. Use the relation z2t=F−x3z^2t=F-x^3. If a product contains two zz factors and positive tt-exponent, distribute at least one tt to these two factors. This redistribution is possible without changing the anticanonical degree: every generator type allows a consecutive interval of tt-exponents starting at zero. For 1≤i+j≤41\le i+j\le4, (zti)(ztj)=Fti+j−1−x3ti+j−1.(zt^i)(zt^j)=Ft^{i+j-1}-x^3t^{i+j-1}. Both terms are products of two degree-one generators. For the first, use F,tFF,tF and 1,t,t21,t,t^2; for the second use x2,tx2x^2,tx^2 and x,tx,t2xx,tx,t^2x. Repetition decreases the number of zz factors, and ends with s=0s=0 or b≤1b\le1. These normal monomials are linearly independent: z2tz^2t is the leading monomial of the single relation in ℂ[x,z,t,F]/(z2t−F+x3)\mathbb C[x,z,t,F]/(z^2t-F+x^3).

For a normal monomial use kk factors of type x2tix^2t^i, together with a−2ka-2k factors of type xtixt^i, bb factors of type ztizt^i, and cc factors of type FtiFt^i. Fill unused places with 1,t,t21,t,t^2. This is possible exactly when max(0,a+b+c−m)≤k≤⌊a/2⌋,s≤2m−k−c.\max(0,a+b+c-m)\le k\le\lfloor a/2\rfloor, \qquad s\le2m-k-c. Taking the smallest kk gives the three inequalities in (I.1).

To count the basis, first take s=0s=0. For fixed b+c=nb+c=n, there are n+1n+1 choices and 2(m−n)+12(m-n)+1 choices of aa. If s≥1s\ge1, then b=0b=0 or 11. Put n=m−b−cn=m-b-c; summing over 0≤a≤2n0\le a\le2n gives (2n+1)(m+b+n)−n(n+1)2(2n+1)(m+b+n)-\frac{n(n+1)}2 choices of (a,s)(a,s). Thus the total is ∑n=0m(n+1)(2m−2n+1)+∑n=0m((2n+1)(m+n)−n(n+1)2)+∑n=0m−1((2n+1)(m+1+n)−n(n+1)2)=10m3+15m2+11m+33.\begin{aligned} &\sum_{n=0}^m(n+1)(2m-2n+1)\\ &\quad+\sum_{n=0}^m\left((2n+1)(m+n)-\frac{n(n+1)}2\right)\\ &\quad+\sum_{n=0}^{m-1}\left((2n+1)(m+1+n)-\frac{n(n+1)}2\right) =\frac{10m^3+15m^2+11m+3}{3}. \end{aligned} Lemma 94.2 therefore proves equality with the actual secondary initial algebra in every degree.

For the primary weight a+b+3c+sa+b+3c+s, the same three disjoint ranges give, respectively, m(m+1)(m+2)(3m+4)6,m(m+1)(7m2+7m+1)2,m(21m3+5m2+3m+1)6.\frac{m(m+1)(m+2)(3m+4)}6,\qquad \frac{m(m+1)(7m^2+7m+1)}2,\qquad \frac{m(21m^3+5m^2+3m+1)}6. Here the first sum is ∑n=0m(n+1)(2m−2n+1)(m+n).\sum_{n=0}^m(n+1)(2m-2n+1)(m+n). For each of the two other sums keep b=0b=0 or b=1b=1, put c=m−b−nc=m-b-n, and sum over 0≤a≤2n0\le a\le2n, 1≤s≤U1\le s\le U, where U=min(m+b+n,m+b+2n−a)U=\min(m+b+n,m+b+2n-a). The summand after summing in ss is U(a+3m−2b−3n)+U(U+1)2.U(a+3m-2b-3n)+\frac{U(U+1)}2. Split the aa-sum at a=na=n and use 0≤n≤m−b0\le n\le m-b. This gives the two displayed expressions. Their total is m(15m3+20m2+15m+4)2,\frac{m(15m^3+20m^2+15m+4)}2, for every m≥0m\ge0. It follows directly that SX(G)=9/4S_X(G)=9/4. ◻

Lemma 100.4 (The cubic pencil and exact moments). Each primary-degree and auxiliary-weight component is a complete binary space with fixed factors (I.2)xk−3vzbtsFℓSymv−ℓ(x3,tz2),x^{k-3v}z^bt^sF^\ell\operatorname{Sym}^{v-\ell}(x^3,tz^2), \tag{I.2} where ℓ=max(0,k+2b−2m,s+k+b−3m),v=min(2m−s,⌊k3⌋).\ell=\max(0,k+2b-2m,s+k+b-3m),\qquad v=\min\left(2m-s,\left\lfloor\frac{k}{3}\right\rfloor\right). The component is nonzero exactly when these indices are nonnegative and v≥ℓv\ge\ell. Put A=k−3vA=k-3v, D=v−ℓD=v-\ell. The normalized sums of (A+3D/2)(D+1)(A+3D/2)(D+1), b(D+1)b(D+1), s(D+1)s(D+1), ℓ(D+1)\ell(D+1) and D(D+1)/2D(D+1)/2 have respective limits (I.3)α=58,b0=140,t0=710,f0=23240,h=49240.\alpha=\frac58,\qquad b_0=\frac1{40},\qquad t_0=\frac7{10},\qquad f_0=\frac{23}{240},\qquad h=\frac{49}{240}. \tag{I.3} The normalizing denominator is mNmmN_m.

Proof. For a monomial in (I.1), the primary degree and auxiliary weight are j=a+b+3c+s,q=a+3c+3s.j=a+b+3c+s,\qquad q=a+3c+3s. Thus q−j=2s−bq-j=2s-b. If q−j≥−1q-j\ge-1, choose the unique b∈{0,1}b\in\{0,1\} with b≡j−q(mod2)b\equiv j-q\pmod2 and put s=(q−j+b)/2s=(q-j+b)/2. If q−j≤−2q-j\le-2, put s=0s=0, b=j−qb=j-q. The normal condition makes this choice unique. Set k=q−3s=a+3ck=q-3s=a+3c. Substituting in (I.1) gives exactly ℓ≤c≤v\ell\le c\le v. Since F=x3+tz2F=x^3+tz^2, the component has the form (I.2).

Here are the integrations for the moments. The first region has s=0s=0 and y=b/my=b/m, 0≤y≤10\le y\le1. The second consists of the two rows b=0,1b=0,1 and has y=s/my=s/m, 0≤y≤20\le y\le2; it is counted twice. Writing k/mk/m again as kk, the lower and upper bounds for c/mc/m are LUzmax(0,k+2y−2)k/3tmax(0,k−2,y+k−3)min(2−y,k/3).\begin{array}{c|c|c} &L&U\\ \hline z&\max(0,k+2y-2)&k/3\\ t&\max(0,k-2,y+k-3)&\min(2-y,k/3). \end{array} Integrate where L≤UL\le U and put D=U−LD=U-L. The first row is bounded by k≤3(1−y)k\le3(1-y), so U=k/3U=k/3 throughout. The exact integrals, including the multiplicity two in the second row, are (I.4)∫D∫(k−3U+3D/2)D∫(b/m)D∫(s/m)D∫LD∫D2/2z1/31/61/1201/361/18t323/1207/37/245/8.\begin{array}{c|cccccc} &\int D&\int(k-3U+3D/2)D&\int(b/m)D&\int(s/m)D &\int LD&\int D^2/2\\ \hline z&1/3&1/6&1/12&0&1/36&1/18\\ t&3&23/12&0&7/3&7/24&5/8. \end{array} \tag{I.4} For example, the first region has two chambers, separated by k=2(1−y)k=2(1-y); direct integration of D=k/3D=k/3 on the lower chamber and D=2−2y−2k/3D=2-2y-2k/3 on the upper gives its first row. For the second region the five chambers are obtained by choosing which affine functions give L,UL,U. The polygons in (y,k)(y,k) are LUvertices02−y(2,0),(2,1),(3/2,3/2)0k/3(0,0),(2,0),(3/2,3/2),(1,2),(0,2)k−2k/3(0,3),(0,2),(1,2),(1,3)y+k−32−y(2,1),(1,3),(3/2,3/2)y+k−3k/3(1,3),(1,2),(3/2,3/2).\begin{array}{c|c|l} L&U&\text{vertices}\\ \hline 0&2-y&(2,0),(2,1),(3/2,3/2)\\ 0&k/3&(0,0),(2,0),(3/2,3/2),(1,2),(0,2)\\ k-2&k/3&(0,3),(0,2),(1,2),(1,3)\\ y+k-3&2-y&(2,1),(1,3),(3/2,3/2)\\ y+k-3&k/3&(1,3),(1,2),(3/2,3/2). \end{array} Integration of the displayed polynomials on these polygons gives the second row of (I.4). Multiplying the summed columns by 3/103/10 gives (I.3); lattice boundaries, floors and ceilings give only lower-order terms.

The fixed xx-coefficient is α−3h=1/80\alpha-3h=1/80. The average ordinary degree is consequently SX(G)=(α−3h)+b0+t0+3f0+6h=94.S_X(G)=(\alpha-3h)+b_0+t_0+3f_0+6h=\frac94. ◻

Lemma 100.5 (Resolution of the cubic pencil). On ℙx,z,t2\mathbb P^2_{x,z,t} put Tλ=(tz2−λx3=0),T0=T0′+2Z0,T∞=3X0,T_\lambda=(tz^2-\lambda x^3=0),\qquad T_0=T_0'+2Z_0,\qquad T_\infty=3X_0, where X0,Z0,T0′X_0,Z_0,T_0' are the coordinate lines. An effective divisor B=aX0+bZ0+cT0′+fT−1+∑νλTλB=aX_0+bZ_0+cT_0'+fT_{-1} +\sum\nu_\lambda T_\lambda with nonnegative coefficients, ∑νλ=2h\sum\nu_\lambda=2h and νλ≤h\nu_\lambda\le h is log canonical provided a+3h,b+2h,c+h,f+h,h≤1,a+3h,\quad b+2h,\quad c+h,\quad f+h,\quad h\le1, and a+3c+3f+6h≤4,2a+3b+6f+12h≤5.a+3c+3f+6h\le4,\qquad 2a+3b+6f+12h\le5.

Proof. Away from the coordinate vertices the pencil members are disjoint and smooth, so the component bounds suffice. At [1:0:0][1:0:0], only the two transverse coordinate lines occur.

At [0:1:0][0:1:0], put z=1z=1. The branches have equations t=λx3t=\lambda x^3. Three successive ordinary blow-ups separate them. The final exceptional valuation has weights (1,3)(1,3) and log discrepancy four. Its order on BB is a+3c+3f+6ha+3c+3f+6h, independently of ν0,ν∞\nu_0,\nu_\infty. The preceding two exceptional inequalities follow by interpolation with the coefficient bound on x=0x=0.

At [0:0:1][0:0:1], put t=1t=1. The nonzero finite members are cusps z2=λx3z^2=\lambda x^3. Write u=a+3ν∞,v=b+2ν0,e=f+2h−ν∞−ν0.u=a+3\nu_\infty,\qquad v=b+2\nu_0,\qquad e=f+2h-\nu_\infty-\nu_0. The regular toric subdivision with exceptional primitive vectors (1,1),(2,3),(1,2)(1,1),(2,3),(1,2) resolves all these cusps simultaneously. Their strict transforms meet the (2,3)(2,3) exceptional curve transversely at distinct points, away from the coordinate corners. The corresponding orders and log discrepancies are (1,1)u+v+2e2(2,3)2u+3v+6e5(1,2)u+2v+3e3.\begin{array}{c|c|c} (1,1)&u+v+2e&2\\ (2,3)&2u+3v+6e&5\\ (1,2)&u+2v+3e&3. \end{array} The middle order is 2a+3b+6f+12h2a+3b+6f+12h. The first equals one third of this order plus u/3u/3; the last equals half this order plus v/2v/2. Since u,v≤1u,v\le1, the asserted bounds imply all three exceptional inequalities. After this subdivision the total transform has simple normal crossings and all coefficients are at most one. This verifies log canonicity at every point and for every divisorial valuation. ◻

Proof of the theorem. An arbitrary basis of each binary component (I.2) produces a divisor of the form in the preceding lemma, with a=αm−3hm,b=bm,c=tm,f=fm.a=\alpha_m-3h_m,\quad b=b_m,\quad c=t_m,\quad f=f_m. Indeed the sum of orders of a basis of degree-DD binary forms at any point is at most D(D+1)/2D(D+1)/2, while its total degree is D(D+1)D(D+1). The limiting component bounds are 58,1330,217240,310,49240.\frac58,\quad\frac{13}{30},\quad\frac{217}{240}, \quad\frac3{10},\quad\frac{49}{240}. The smooth tangency corner has order 29/829/8 and discrepancy four; the cusp corner has order 25/825/8 and discrepancy five. The largest of all these ratios is 29/3229/32. Thus all these basis divisors have log canonical threshold at least any fixed τ<32/29\tau<32/29 for all sufficiently large mm.

For a divisor over GG, choose a basis of each primary piece compatible with its valuation filtration and the auxiliary weight filtration. The least-weight degeneration has the binary components (I.2), because the normal-basis count proved equality of algebras. Lower semicontinuity of log canonical thresholds therefore gives the same bound for the original valuation-adapted basis divisor. It follows that δ(G;WG)≥32/29\delta(G;W^G)\ge32/29. Finally, Abban–Zhuang adjunction gives δp(X)≥min{39/4,3229}=3229.\delta_p(X)\ge\min\left\{\frac{3}{9/4},\frac{32}{29}\right\} =\frac{32}{29}. Again the proof needs no Zariski decomposition on the threefold extraction: the actual refined series is identified by sections and an exact Hilbert count, and its thresholds are controlled by two explicit surface resolutions of a pencil. ◻