Section 45
Ordinary lines in singular fibres
Let be an ordinary line, so that , and suppose that is contained in a member of the pencil defining . Write for its proper transform on , and put . Thus and meet transversally at . We identify with .
Lemma 45.1. Suppose that the pencil surface is singular at a point of . There are homogeneous coordinates on such that and the unique singular point of this surface on is . If is the exceptional divisor of , then and . On the chart , with , there are fibre coordinates for which actual leading sections of are The two leading sections of the pencil class are . Moreover ; if , then .
Proof. Let be the exceptional divisor of . Projection from is given by ; see [27, Lemma 4.3]. The resolved projection is the blow-up of a smooth quadric along a twisted cubic; see [54, proof of Theorem 3.6, p. 65]. Its exceptional divisor has class by the canonical divisor formula. The restriction of embeds as a smooth quadric surface; its intersection with the other exceptional divisor is the twisted cubic that is blown up. Consequently the unique leading section of of line order two cuts out an irreducible curve of bidegree on .
There are two order-zero sections and four order-one sections. The latter form the complete space : the kernel of the leading-term map is the one-dimensional space , while . The differential of the pencil member is therefore a pair of linear forms on . Since it has a zero, the pair has rank one. Choose normal coordinates such that this differential is , and choose the other pencil coordinate to restrict to . Smoothness of implies that and have distinct zeros. The elementary modification of the normal bundle at is given by , . Hence , giving and the displayed sections. Irreducibility of the curve proves the two nonvanishing assertions. ◻
We use valuation vectors , where is the order along , is the exponent of in the leading form, and is its order at the specified base coordinate zero. The order is taken before . A degree- section of normal degree is a section of on , where and . Its coefficient of has base degree . In particular, the four toric boundary coefficients obtained from mean exponents are
Lemma 45.2 (The line invariant and its first refinement). One has . If , the refined threshold on is at least . If , every divisorial valuation with centre has positive beta-invariant, and .
Proof. The leading coefficient of is . We first check the boundedness hypothesis of Lemma 34.2 independently of any moment calculation. Write , and choose a very ample divisor on . A section of of order along gives an effective divisor in . Therefore The denominator is positive because is an effective prime divisor. Furthermore, and , by the coefficient bundle computed above. Thus all three recorded coordinates are uniformly . Their successive flag orders have one-dimensional leaves and add under multiplication. All certificates below are leading forms of actual sections. Together with the lattice checks in each case, this proves all hypotheses of Lemma 34.2 before that lemma is used.
If , the seven vectors are Adjoin their translates by , corresponding to multiplication by . Their convex hull has volume and centroid . Its four boundary coefficients are which proves the assertion.
Suppose that , and rescale so that . Replace the last vector above by . The following degree-two sections provide the missing leading vectors: Every factor on the left is a degree-one anticanonical section. If , their normalized vectors are ; if , they are . Both hulls have volume . Their boundary coefficients are, respectively, In all three computations . The degree-one vectors generate the full exponent lattice. The full-volume lemma therefore proves the asserted value of and all the displayed means. Over the generic point of , only the first two boundary coefficients occur, and they are smaller than one. Over , the third boundary is disjoint from the fibre and the other three coefficients are smaller than one. The toric one-parameter subgroups preserve that fibre, so semicontinuity applies on a neighbourhood of it. Abban–Zhuang adjunction, with first ratio , proves the remaining assertions. ◻
Lemma 45.3 (A base coordinate centred at the point). If , then .
Proof. Only remains. Choose a base coordinate vanishing at and rescale so that the differential vanishes at . Put . Replacing by makes the mixed coefficient constant, so that The leading pencil section is . The following are degree-one anticanonical leading sections: For example is obtained by subtracting from . Define degree-two sections If , the degree-two sections have normalized leading vectors and . The degree-one vectors are Their hull with these two additional vectors has volume and first moment . The three boundary coefficients meeting the fibre over are therefore , all smaller than one.
Suppose that . Then , and the degree-two sections give the vectors . This hull has volume and first -moment . It is enough to bound the missing volume. The full-volume certificate in Lemma 45.2 implies for every actual valuation vector: a vector outside that full-dimensional body would enlarge its convex hull and contradict the leading Hilbert coefficient. Thus . The missing volume is , and hence The two marginal normal means are unchanged by the base coordinate: All three coefficients meeting the fibre are therefore at most .
For completeness, these volume calculations use the following halfspaces, with coordinates . In the first case they are In the second case they are , , , , , and . Coning their faces to an interior point gives the stated volumes and moments.
Choose the monomial degenerations with respect to the coordinate just fixed. They preserve the entire proper fibre over . For every , the limiting basis pair is Kawamata log terminal near that fibre. Properness of the fixed fibre and semicontinuity give the same assertion before degeneration. Taking gives the bound for the original refined series. The first ratio is . Abban–Zhuang adjunction gives the result. ◻
Example 45.4. For the ordinary line refinement has coefficient over the singular point , so this extraction alone does not settle that point. Nevertheless it settles the generic centre , its point above , and every other point of . After moving the base coordinate to one of these other points, the sections and above and the missing-volume estimate suffice; no decomposition on the blown-up threefold is needed.