Text size

Section 45

Ordinary lines in singular fibres

Let ℓ⊂V5\ell\subset V_5 be an ordinary line, so that Nℓ/V5≃𝒪ℙ1⊕2N_{\ell/V_5}\simeq\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}^{\oplus2}, and suppose that ℓ\ell is contained in a member of the pencil defining XX. Write ZZ for its proper transform on XX, and put q=ℓ∩Cq=\ell\cap C. Thus ℓ\ell and CC meet transversally at qq. We identify ZZ with ℓ\ell.

Lemma 45.1. Suppose that the pencil surface is singular at a point of ℓ\ell. There are homogeneous coordinates z0,z1z_0,z_1 on ℓ\ell such that q=(z0=0)q=(z_0=0) and the unique singular point of this surface on ℓ\ell is r=(z1=0)r=(z_1=0). If GG is the exceptional divisor of BlZX\operatorname{Bl}_Z X, then G≃𝔽1G\simeq\mathbb F_1 and AX(G)=2A_X(G)=2. On the chart z0=1z_0=1, with z=z1/z0z=z_1/z_0, there are fibre coordinates t,nt,n for which actual leading sections of HH are 1,z,t,zt,n,zn,D,D=(A0+A1z)t2+(B0+B1z)tn+(C0+C1z)n2.1,z,t,zt,n,zn,D, \qquad D=(A_0+A_1z)t^2+(B_0+B_1z)tn+(C_0+C_1z)n^2. The two leading sections of the pencil class are 1,zn1,zn. Moreover (A0,A1)≠(0,0)(A_0,A_1)\ne(0,0); if A0=0A_0=0, then (B0,C0)≠(0,0)(B_0,C_0)\ne(0,0).

Proof. Let JJ be the exceptional divisor of BlℓV5\operatorname{Bl}_{\ell}V_5. Projection from ℓ\ell is given by H−JH-J; see [27, Lemma 4.3]. The resolved projection is the blow-up of a smooth quadric along a twisted cubic; see [54, proof of Theorem 3.6, p. 65]. Its exceptional divisor has class H−2JH-2J by the canonical divisor formula. The restriction of H−JH-J embeds J≃𝔽0J\simeq\mathbb F_0 as a smooth quadric surface; its intersection with the other exceptional divisor is the twisted cubic that is blown up. Consequently the unique leading section of HH of line order two cuts out an irreducible curve of bidegree (2,1)(2,1) on JJ.

There are two order-zero sections and four order-one sections. The latter form the complete space H0(ℓ,Nℓ/V5∨⊗𝒪ℓ(1))H^0(\ell,N_{\ell/V_5}^{\vee}\otimes\mathcal O_{\ell}(1)): the kernel of the leading-term map is the one-dimensional space H0(H−2J)H^0(H-2J), while h0(H−J)=5h^0(H-J)=5. The differential of the pencil member is therefore a pair of linear forms on ℓ\ell. Since it has a zero, the pair has rank one. Choose normal coordinates a,ba,b such that this differential is z1bz_1b, and choose the other pencil coordinate to restrict to z0z_0. Smoothness of CC implies that z0z_0 and z1z_1 have distinct zeros. The elementary modification of the normal bundle at qq is given by a=ta=t, b=z0nb=z_0n. Hence NZ/X≃𝒪⊕𝒪(−1)N_{Z/X}\simeq\mathcal O\oplus\mathcal O(-1), giving G≃𝔽1G\simeq\mathbb F_1 and the displayed sections. Irreducibility of the (2,1)(2,1) curve proves the two nonvanishing assertions. ◻

We use valuation vectors (j,k,h)(j,k,h), where jj is the order along GG, kk is the exponent of nn in the leading form, and hh is its order at the specified base coordinate zero. The order kk is taken before hh. A degree-mm section of normal degree jj is a section of mf+jζmf+j\zeta on GG, where ζ=s+f\zeta=s+f and s2=−1s^2=-1. Its coefficient of tj−knkt^{j-k}n^k has base degree m+km+k. In particular, the four toric boundary coefficients obtained from mean exponents μj,μk,μh\mu_j,\mu_k,\mu_h are μj−μk,μk,μh,1+μk−μh.\mu_j-\mu_k,\quad\mu_k,\quad\mu_h,\quad 1+\mu_k-\mu_h.

Lemma 45.2 (The line invariant and its first refinement). One has SX(G)=3/2S_X(G)=3/2. If A0≠0A_0\ne0, the refined threshold on GG is at least 16/1516/15. If A0=0A_0=0, every divisorial valuation with centre ZZ has positive beta-invariant, and δq(X)>1\delta_q(X)>1.

Proof. The leading coefficient of h0(X,mL)h^0(X,mL) is 10/310/3. We first check the boundedness hypothesis of Lemma 34.2 independently of any moment calculation. Write σ:Y=BlZX→X\sigma:Y=\operatorname{Bl}_Z X\to X, and choose a very ample divisor MM on YY. A section of mLmL of order jj along GG gives an effective divisor in |mσ*L−jG||m\sigma^*L-jG|. Therefore j≤mσ*L⋅M2G⋅M2.j\le m\,\frac{\sigma^*L\cdot M^2}{G\cdot M^2}. The denominator is positive because GG is an effective prime divisor. Furthermore, 0≤k≤j0\le k\le j and 0≤h≤m+k0\le h\le m+k, by the coefficient bundle computed above. Thus all three recorded coordinates are uniformly O(m)O(m). Their successive flag orders have one-dimensional leaves and add under multiplication. All certificates below are leading forms of actual sections. Together with the lattice checks in each case, this proves all hypotheses of Lemma 34.2 before that lemma is used.

If A0≠0A_0\ne0, the seven HH vectors are (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(2,0,0).(0,0,0),(0,0,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(2,0,0). Adjoin their translates by (1,1,1)(1,1,1), corresponding to multiplication by znzn. Their convex hull has volume 10/310/3 and centroid (3/2,13/16,15/16)(3/2,13/16,15/16). Its four boundary coefficients are 11/16,13/16,15/16,7/8,11/16,\quad13/16,\quad15/16,\quad7/8, which proves the assertion.

Suppose that A0=0A_0=0, and rescale so that A1=1A_1=1. Replace the last vector above by (2,0,1)(2,0,1). The following degree-two sections provide the missing leading vectors: P=Dn−t(ztn)−B1n(ztn)−C1n(zn2)=B0tn2+C0n3,Q=D(zn2)−(ztn)2−B1(ztn)(zn2)−C1(zn2)2=znP.\begin{split} P&=Dn-t(ztn)-B_1n(ztn)-C_1n(zn^2) =B_0tn^2+C_0n^3,\\ Q&=D(zn^2)-(ztn)^2-B_1(ztn)(zn^2)-C_1(zn^2)^2=znP. \end{split} Every factor on the left is a degree-one anticanonical section. If B0≠0B_0\ne0, their normalized vectors are (3/2,1,0),(2,3/2,1/2)(3/2,1,0),(2,3/2,1/2); if B0=0B_0=0, they are (3/2,3/2,0),(2,2,1/2)(3/2,3/2,0),(2,2,1/2). Both hulls have volume 10/310/3. Their boundary coefficients are, respectively, (213/320,267/320,333/320,127/160),(103/160,137/160,333/320,261/320).(213/320,267/320,333/320,127/160),\qquad (103/160,137/160,333/320,261/320). In all three computations μj=3/2\mu_j=3/2. The degree-one vectors generate the full exponent lattice. The full-volume lemma therefore proves the asserted value of SX(G)S_X(G) and all the displayed means. Over the generic point of ZZ, only the first two boundary coefficients occur, and they are smaller than one. Over qq, the third boundary is disjoint from the fibre and the other three coefficients are smaller than one. The toric one-parameter subgroups preserve that fibre, so semicontinuity applies on a neighbourhood of it. Abban–Zhuang adjunction, with first ratio 2/(3/2)=4/32/(3/2)=4/3, proves the remaining assertions. ◻

Lemma 45.3 (A base coordinate centred at the point). If p∈Z\{q,r}p\in Z\setminus\{q,r\}, then δp(X)≥64/57\delta_p(X)\ge64/57.

Proof. Only A0=0A_0=0 remains. Choose a base coordinate zz vanishing at pp and rescale so that the differential vanishes at z=−1z=-1. Put w=z+1w=z+1. Replacing tt by t+λnt+\lambda n makes the mixed coefficient constant, so that D=wt2+btn+(a+dz)n2,c=a−d,(b,c)≠(0,0).D=wt^2+btn+(a+dz)n^2,\qquad c=a-d,\qquad(b,c)\ne(0,0). The leading pencil section is wnwn. The following are degree-one anticanonical leading sections: 1,z,T=t,Tz=zt,N=n,Nz=zn,Nzz=z2n,U=wtn,Uz=zwtn,V=wn2,Vz=zwn2,D,wnD.\begin{gathered} 1,z,\ T=t,\ T_z=zt,\ N=n,\ N_z=zn,\ N_{zz}=z^2n,\\ U=wtn,\ U_z=zwtn,\ V=wn^2,\ V_z=zwn^2,\ D,\ wnD. \end{gathered} For example NzzN_{zz} is obtained by subtracting znzn from (wn)z(wn)z. Define degree-two sections P=DN−TU−dNV=btn2+cn3,Q=DV−U2−dV2=wnP.P=DN-TU-dNV=btn^2+cn^3,\qquad Q=DV-U^2-dV^2=wnP. If b≠0b\ne0, the degree-two sections R=NzzUz−TzVz+TVz−TV+P/b=z4tn2+(c/b)n3,S=UzVz−UzV+UV−Q/b=wz3tn3−(c/b)wn4\begin{split} R&=N_{zz}U_z-T_zV_z+TV_z-TV+P/b=z^4tn^2+(c/b)n^3,\\ S&=U_zV_z-U_zV+UV-Q/b=wz^3tn^3-(c/b)wn^4 \end{split} have normalized leading vectors (3/2,1,2)(3/2,1,2) and (2,3/2,3/2)(2,3/2,3/2). The degree-one vectors are (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(1,1,2),(2,1,0),(2,1,1),(2,2,0),(2,2,1),(2,0,0),(3,1,0).\begin{gathered} (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,1,0),(1,1,1),(1,1,2),\\ (2,1,0),(2,1,1),(2,2,0),(2,2,1),(2,0,0),(3,1,0). \end{gathered} Their hull with these two additional vectors has volume 10/310/3 and first moment (5,89/32,215/96)(5,89/32,215/96). The three boundary coefficients meeting the fibre over pp are therefore 213/320,267/320,43/64213/320,267/320,43/64, all smaller than one.

Suppose that b=0b=0. Then c≠0c\ne0, and the degree-two sections R0=NzzVz−NzVz+NVz−NV+P/c=z4n3,S0=Vz2−VzV+V2−Q/c=wz3n4R_0=N_{zz}V_z-N_zV_z+NV_z-NV+P/c=z^4n^3,\qquad S_0=V_z^2-V_zV+V^2-Q/c=wz^3n^4 give the vectors (3/2,3/2,2),(2,2,3/2)(3/2,3/2,2),(2,2,3/2). This hull has volume 37/1237/12 and first hh-moment 63/3263/32. It is enough to bound the missing volume. The full-volume certificate in Lemma 45.2 implies j≤3mj\le3m for every actual valuation vector: a vector outside that full-dimensional body would enlarge its convex hull and contradict the leading Hilbert coefficient. Thus h≤m+k≤m+j≤4mh\le m+k\le m+j\le4m. The missing volume is 10/3−37/12=1/410/3-37/12=1/4, and hence μh≤63/32+4(1/4)10/3=5764.\mu_h\le\frac{63/32+4(1/4)}{10/3}=\frac{57}{64}. The two marginal normal means are unchanged by the base coordinate: 103/160,137/160.103/160,\qquad137/160. All three coefficients meeting the fibre are therefore at most 57/6457/64.

For completeness, these volume calculations use the following halfspaces, with coordinates (j,k,h)(j,k,h). In the first case they are k≤j,k,h≥0,h−k≤1,k+h≤3,j+k≤4,2j−3k+2h≤4,2j+k+h≤7,4j−4k+3h≤8,4j−k+3h≤11.\begin{gathered} k\le j,\ k,h\ge0,\ h-k\le1,\ k+h\le3,\ j+k\le4,\\ 2j-3k+2h\le4,\quad2j+k+h\le7,\quad 4j-4k+3h\le8,\quad4j-k+3h\le11. \end{gathered} In the second case they are k≤jk\le j, k,h≥0k,h\ge0, h−k≤1h-k\le1, j−k+h≤2j-k+h\le2, j+k≤4j+k\le4, and 5j−k+4h≤145j-k+4h\le14. Coning their faces to an interior point gives the stated volumes and moments.

Choose the monomial degenerations with respect to the coordinate zz just fixed. They preserve the entire proper fibre over pp. For every λ<64/57\lambda<64/57, the limiting basis pair is Kawamata log terminal near that fibre. Properness of the fixed fibre and semicontinuity give the same assertion before degeneration. Taking λ↑64/57\lambda\uparrow64/57 gives the bound for the original refined series. The first ratio is 4/34/3. Abban–Zhuang adjunction gives the result. ◻

Example 45.4. For D=zt2+n2D=zt^2+n^2 the ordinary line refinement has coefficient 333/320333/320 over the singular point z=0z=0, so this extraction alone does not settle that point. Nevertheless it settles the generic centre ZZ, its point above CC, and every other point of ZZ. After moving the base coordinate to one of these other points, the sections R0R_0 and S0S_0 above and the missing-volume estimate suffice; no decomposition on the blown-up threefold is needed.