Text size

Section 50

Points of type A3A_3

50.1 The weighted initial algebra at an A3A_3 point

Lemma 50.1. Let pp be an A3A_3 point of a fibre. There are regular parameters u,v,wu,v,w, with weights 2,2,12,2,1, such that the leading hyperplane sections are 1,u,v,w,P=vw,Q=v(u+v),B=u2+uv−vw2,1,u,v,w,P=vw,Q=v(u+v),B=u^2+uv-vw^2, and BB is the leading equation of the fibre. The full initial homogeneous coordinate algebra of VV is (50.1)hP=vw,hQ=v(u+v),hB=u2+uv−Pw,vB−uQ+P2=0,P(u+v)−wQ=0.\label{f214:eq:A3-ring} hP=vw,\quad hQ=v(u+v),\quad hB=u^2+uv-Pw,\quad vB-uQ+P^2=0,\quad P(u+v)-wQ=0. The initial Cox algebra is obtained by h=ae,B=beh=ae,B=be, with deg(a)=deg(b)=F\deg(a)=\deg(b)=F, deg(e)=H−F\deg(e)=H-F and extraction weights 0,4,00,4,0. If GG is the exceptional divisor, then AX(G)=5,SX(G)=7116.A_X(G)=5,\qquad S_X(G)=\frac{71}{16}.

Proof. By Lemma 43.4, the image of pp belongs to the two-dimensional orbit. In the translated chart used there the fibre has equation u2+(b+1)uv+bv2+bu3+buvw−u2w−vw2,b≠1.u^2+(b+1)uv+bv^2+bu^3+buvw-u^2w-vw^2, \qquad b\ne1. With weights (2,2,1)(2,2,1) its initial form is Bb=u2+(b+1)uv+bv2−vw2B_b=u^2+(b+1)uv+bv^2-vw^2. The other two normal hyperplane coordinates have initial forms vwvw and v(u+v)v(u+v). Put c=(1−b)−1c=(1-b)^{-1} and make the weighted linear change u′=cu+(c−1)vu'=cu+(c-1)v, v′=vv'=v, w′=cww'=cw. It gives P′=cPP'=cP, Q′=cQQ'=cQ and B′0=c2BbB'_0=c^2B_b. Thus it identifies the complete space of leading hyperplane sections, together with its distinguished fibre section, with the displayed model.

The equations (50.1) are the five maximal Pfaffians of (0hu+v−w0−h0−Pu−v−(u+v)P0B−Qw−u−B0P0vQ−P0).\begin{pmatrix} 0&h&u+v&-w&0\\ -h&0&-P&u&-v\\ -(u+v)&P&0&B&-Q\\ w&-u&-B&0&P\\ 0&v&Q&-P&0 \end{pmatrix}. After inverting hh they give the polynomial algebra in h±1,u,v,wh^{\pm1},u,v,w. On h=0h=0, the branch v≠0v\ne0 has w=0w=0, u=−vu=-v and vB+vQ+P2=0vB+vQ+P^2=0, so its closure has dimension three. On the branch v=0v=0, the remaining equations in u,w,P,Qu,w,P,Q are u2=Pwu^2=Pw, uQ=P2uQ=P^2, uP=wQuP=wQ. They define an affine cone over a twisted cubic; BB is free, and this branch also has dimension three. The Pfaffian ideal has height three and its resolution is Cohen–Macaulay. Thus hh is regular and the algebra is a domain. Its Hilbert series is (1+3t+t2)/(1−t)4(1+3t+t^2)/(1-t)^4. The algebra generated by the displayed leading hyperplane sections embeds in the associated graded section algebra. Equality of their Hilbert functions proves equality of the algebras. In particular, this argument accounts for every cancellation among sections.

The substituted Cox algebra is also a domain. On e≠0e\ne0 this follows from the preceding paragraph. The boundary h=B=0h=B=0 in (50.1) has dimension two; hence after substitution e=0e=0 has dimension four, whereas the whole algebra has dimension five. In particular h,Bh,B are a regular sequence in the primary initial algebra. Lemma 43.1 proves that ee is regular, that the graph is a domain, and that its divisor-degree components give the actual full initial global section algebra.

Here is the weight calculation separately. Let tt record HH-degree, rr record FF-degree, and ss record extraction weight. The weighted Hilbert series is 1−t2∑d∈𝒟sd+t3∑d∈𝒟s11−d−t5s11(1−ts)(1−ts2)2(1−ts3)(1−ts4)(1−r)(1−rs4)(1−t/r),𝒟=(3,4,4,5,6).\frac{1-t^2\sum_{d\in\mathcal D}s^d +t^3\sum_{d\in\mathcal D}s^{11-d}-t^5s^{11}} {(1-ts)^{}(1-ts^2)^2(1-ts^3)(1-ts^4) (1-r)(1-rs^4)(1-t/r)}, \qquad\mathcal D=(3,4,4,5,6). The coefficient of tmrmt^mr^m at s=1s=1 is Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)/3N_m=(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)/3. Differentiating in ss and then setting s=1s=1 gives the total weight Tm=m(355m3+510m2+377m+102)24.T_m=\frac{m(355m^3+510m^2+377m+102)}{24}. For example, this coefficient can be checked by summing over the exponent ii of ee: a numerator term εtasd\varepsilon t^as^d contributes ε∑i=0m−a(m−a−i+44)(m+i+1)(125(m−a−i)+2(m+i)+d).\varepsilon\sum_{i=0}^{m-a} {m-a-i+4\choose4}(m+i+1) \left(\frac{12}{5}(m-a-i)+2(m+i)+d\right). It follows that SX(G)=limTm/(mNm)=71/16S_X(G)=\lim T_m/(mN_m)=71/16. The discrepancy is 2+2+1=52+2+1=5. ◻

50.2 The refined series at a point of type A3A_3

We use the weighted initial model from the preceding lemma. Thus G=ℙ(2,2,1)G=\mathbb P(2,2,1) has weighted coordinates u,v,wu,v,w, and its coarse space is ℙ2\mathbb P^2 with coordinates u,v,z=w2u,v,z=w^2. The different is ΔG=12{z=0}\Delta_G=\frac12\{z=0\}. Put P=vw,Q=v(u+v),B=u2+uv−vw2.P=vw,\qquad Q=v(u+v),\qquad B=u^2+uv-vw^2. The refined section algebra is generated, in anticanonical degree one, by the polynomials in ℋ+Bℋ\mathcal H+B\mathcal H, where ℋ=⟨1,u,v,w,P,Q,B⟩\mathcal H=\langle1,u,v,w,P,Q,B\rangle. Their native weighted degrees are respectively 0,2,2,1,3,4,40,2,2,1,3,4,4. Write Wm,jW_{m,j} for the native-degree jj piece in anticanonical degree mm. As before, Nm=(2m+1)(5m2+5m+3)/3N_m=(2m+1)(5m^2+5m+3)/3.

The parameter in the A3A_3 normal form does not affect this model. Indeed, for Bb=u2+(b+1)uv+bv2−vw2B_b=u^2+(b+1)uv+bv^2-vw^2, where b≠1b\ne1, put a=(1−b)−1a=(1-b)^{-1} and u′=au+(a−1)vu'=au+(a-1)v, v′=vv'=v, w′=aww'=aw. Direct substitution gives P′=aPP'=aP, Q′=aQQ'=aQ and B′0=a2BbB'_0=a^2B_b. Thus the weighted change of coordinates identifies the corresponding section algebras, including all their graded pieces.

Lemma 50.2. Let D={B=0}⊂GD=\{B=0\}\subset G, and let q=[0:0:1]∈Dq=[0:0:1]\in D. Then S(W;D)=1116,S(WD;q)=1916,S(W;{z=0})=732.S(W;D)=\frac{11}{16},\qquad S(W^D;q)=\frac{19}{16},\qquad S(W;\{z=0\})=\frac7{32}.

Proof. On w=1w=1, write b=Bb=B. Then v=(u2−b)/(1−u)v=(u^2-b)/(1-u). Multiplication by the common unit (1−u)2m(1-u)^{2m} clears the denominators of all degree-mm sections. The flag D⊃qD\supset q therefore records the lowest bb-power and then the lowest uu-power. With coordinates (α,β,j)(\alpha,\beta,j) recording the uu-order, the bb-order, and the native degree, respectively, the degree-one pivot vectors are (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,4),(0,1,5),(0,2,8),(1,0,2),(1,1,6),(2,0,2),(2,0,3),(2,1,6),(2,1,7),(3,0,4),(3,1,8).\begin{gathered} (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,4),(0,1,5),(0,2,8),\\ (1,0,2),(1,1,6),(2,0,2),(2,0,3),\\ (2,1,6),(2,1,7),(3,0,4),(3,1,8). \end{gathered} For example Q|D=u3/(1−u)2Q|_D=u^3/(1-u)^2, which gives (3,0,4)(3,0,4), and BQBQ gives (3,1,8)(3,1,8). These thirteen vectors are distinct, so these leading terms give a basis in degree one. Their convex hull has vertices (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,5),(0,2,8),(2,0,2),(2,1,6),(3,0,4),(3,1,8).(0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,5),(0,2,8), (2,0,2),(2,1,6),(3,0,4),(3,1,8). Its volume is 10/310/3, its first moment is (95/24,55/24,355/24)(95/24,55/24,355/24), and its centroid is (19/16,11/16,71/16).(19/16,11/16,71/16). The degree-prefixed vectors generate the full lattice: use 1,w,u,B1,w,u,B. The semigroup-volume lemma identifies these with the actual asymptotic moments, since Nm=(10/3)m3+O(m2)N_m=(10/3)m^3+O(m^2). This proves the first two claims.

For the boundary, take the lowest ww-power and then the highest uu-power within each native-degree piece. The degree-one leading terms, together with the degree-two sections Q2−Bv2Q^2-Bv^2 and B(Q2−Bv2)B(Q^2-Bv^2), give a convex hull with vertices (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(2,0,1),(2,1,1),(3,1,0),(4,0,0),(12,32,0),(32,32,0).\begin{gathered} (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(2,0,1),\\ (2,1,1),(3,1,0),(4,0,0), (\tfrac12,\tfrac32,0),(\tfrac32,\tfrac32,0). \end{gathered} Here the coordinates are the normalized exponents of (u,v,w)(u,v,w). The two new vertices follow from Q2−Bv2=v3(u+v+w2)Q^2-Bv^2=v^3(u+v+w^2). The hull has volume 10/310/3 and centroid (453/320,187/320,7/16)(453/320,187/320,7/16). Its ww-moment is therefore 7/167/16. On the coarse surface, the divisor of the weighted section ww is 12{z=0}\frac12\{z=0\}, giving S(W;{z=0})=7/32S(W;\{z=0\})=7/32. All the volume and moment assertions are obtained by triangulating these explicitly listed rational polyhedra and applying the determinant formula for the volume and centroid of a tetrahedron. ◻

Lemma 50.3. One has δq(G,ΔG;W)≥48/41>1\delta_q(G,\Delta_G;W)\ge48/41>1.

Proof. The point qq is smooth and lies outside ΔG\Delta_G. Blow it up with weights (1,2)(1,2) in the coordinates (u,v)(u,v), and denote the exceptional curve by K=ℙ(1,2)K=\mathbb P(1,2). Its log discrepancy is 33, and its different has coefficient 1/21/2 at the point u=0u=0. Put y=v−u2y=v-u^2 and let p∈Kp\in K be the ordinary point y=0y=0. Take the lowest (1,2)(1,2)-weight and then the lowest yy-power. The degree-one pivot vectors (α,β,j)(\alpha,\beta,j) are exactly the first thirteen vectors in the preceding proof. Indeed the initial terms of v,P,Q,Bv,P,Q,B are respectively u2+y,u2+y,u(u2+y),−yu^2+y,u^2+y,u(u^2+y),-y. The same full-volume certificate gives S(W;K)=1916+21116=4116,S(WK;p)=1116.S(W;K)=\frac{19}{16}+2\frac{11}{16}=\frac{41}{16}, \qquad S(W^K;p)=\frac{11}{16}. The expected degree of the residual divisors on KK is 41/3241/32. For any ordinary point r≠pr\ne p, choose a basis simultaneously adapted to pp and rr in every graded piece. The sum of their multiplicities is at most the degree; hence S(WK;r)≤19/32S(W^K;r)\le19/32.

At the orbifold point use instead the lowest uu-power after taking the (1,2)(1,2)-initial form. The degree-one pivot vectors are (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,2),(0,1,3),(0,1,4),(0,1,5),(0,2,6),(0,2,7),(0,2,8),(1,0,2),(1,1,4),(1,1,6),(1,2,8).\begin{gathered} (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(0,1,2),(0,1,3),(0,1,4),(0,1,5),\\ (0,2,6),(0,2,7),(0,2,8),(1,0,2), (1,1,4),(1,1,6),(1,2,8). \end{gathered} Their hull again has volume 10/310/3, with centroid (7/16,17/16,71/16).(7/16,17/16,71/16). Since u2/vu^2/v is a coarse uniformizer at u=0u=0, this gives S(WK;{u=0})=7/32<1/2S(W^K;\{u=0\})=7/32<1/2. Consequently δ(K,DiffK;WK)≥min{16/11,32/19,16/7}=16/11.\delta(K,\operatorname{Diff}_K;W^K) \ge\min\{16/11,32/19,16/7\}=16/11. Applying Abban–Zhuang gives the required bound min{3/(41/16),16/11}=48/41\min\{3/(41/16),16/11\}=48/41. ◻

Lemma 50.4. One has δ(G,ΔG;W)≥1\delta(G,\Delta_G;W)\ge1.

Proof. Let HH denote the line class on the coarse surface G=ℙ2G=\mathbb P^2. The expected class of a basis divisor is (71/32)H(71/32)H, and D∼2HD\sim2H. On DD, the expected degree after restriction is 2(71/32−2⋅11/16)=27/162(71/32-2\cdot11/16)=27/16. At every point other than qq, simultaneous bases with the qq-filtration therefore give a refined SS-invariant at most 27/16−19/16=1/227/16-19/16=1/2. The different of DD has coefficient 1/21/2 at its two intersections with {z=0}\{z=0\}, and is zero elsewhere. Thus the refined threshold is at least one on D\{q}D\setminus\{q\}; the preceding lemma treats qq. Since S(W;D)=11/16<1S(W;D)=11/16<1, Abban–Zhuang proves the assertion along DD.

For completeness, consider a point outside DD. Choose a line CC through it; if the point lies on {z=0}\{z=0\}, take this boundary line itself. In each CC-graded piece choose a basis simultaneously adapted to the induced DD-filtration and the chosen point. These bases lift to bases adapted to both original divisor filtrations. In particular the sum of their induced DD-weights is the original DD-weight sum. Every residual divisor contains its corresponding multiple of D|CD|_C, whose support avoids the point under consideration. If s=S(W;C)s=S(W;C), its point invariant is consequently at most 7132−s−21116=2732−s≤2732.\frac{71}{32}-s-2\frac{11}{16} =\frac{27}{32}-s\le\frac{27}{32}. Before restriction, a common basis for CC and DD gives an effective averaged residual class (27/32−s)H(27/32-s)H. Hence s≤27/32s\le27/32. For C≠{z=0}C\ne\{z=0\} this is below its discrepancy 11. For the boundary line its discrepancy is 1/21/2 and its invariant is 7/327/32, by Lemma 50.2; the restriction bound is then 5/8<15/8<1. The induced different on this boundary line is zero. Abban–Zhuang proves the assertion off DD as well. ◻

Remark 50.5. The last lower bound need not be made strict. The primary extraction has AX(G)=5A_X(G)=5 and SX(G)=71/16S_X(G)=71/16, so its discrepancy margin is 9/169/16. The strict form of the Abban–Zhuang argument therefore gives βX(F)≥(9/16)ordF(G)>0\beta_X(F)\ge(9/16)\operatorname{ord}_F(G)>0 for every divisorial valuation centred at the original A3A_3 point.