Text size

Section 47

The remaining lines of the second kind

We retain the affine coordinates u,v,wu,v,w along a line ZZ of the second kind and put A=u2+wvA=u^2+wv. The point w=0w=0 is the closed-orbit point of ZZ. A fibre which is tangent in the relevant normal direction has weighted initial equation f=(β−εw)A+δv.f=(\beta-\varepsilon w)A+\delta v. The case δ=0\delta=0 was treated by the 𝔽2\mathbb F_2 calculations above. We now suppose δ≠0\delta\ne0 and divide the equation by δ\delta. The other pencil section restricts to a linear form on ZZ, vanishing at q=C∩Zq=C\cap Z. The automorphisms preserving ZZ act on it as the stabilizer of its closed-orbit point. We may therefore use one of the following two normalizations: qg|Zfirst case∞1second case0w.\begin{array}{c|c|c} &q&g|_Z\\\hline \text{first case}&\infty&1\\ \text{second case}&0&w. \end{array} In the second case any specified point different from qq can in addition be chosen to have finite nonzero coordinate. This observation will avoid an unnecessary extra infinity chart in the pointwise argument.

Lemma 47.1. The weight-(1,2)(1,2) extraction along ZZ has discrepancy 33 and coarse exceptional surface G≅ℙ1×ℙ1G\cong\mathbb P^1\times\mathbb P^1. Write hh for a horizontal section class and cc for a ruling. Its different and restrictions are ΔG=12D,D∼h+2c,G|G=−12h,L|G=c.\Delta_G=\tfrac12D,\quad D\sim h+2c,\quad G|_G=-\tfrac12h,\quad L|_G=c. The curve DD is smooth. Put s=f/gs=f/g and Q(w)=1+βw−εw2Q(w)=1+\beta w-\varepsilon w^2. On the index-two cover the primary equation and section spaces are (47.1)u2=Q(w)A−wg(w)s,H=⟨1,w,u,A,uA,v,wA⟩,F=⟨1,s⟩,\label{f214:eq:F0-primary-model} u^2=Q(w)A-wg(w)s,\qquad H=\langle1,w,u,A,uA,v,wA\rangle,\qquad F=\langle1,s\rangle, where v=g(w)s−(β−εw)Av=g(w)s-(\beta-\varepsilon w)A. Their primary degrees are respectively 0,0,1,2,3,2,20,0,1,2,3,2,2 and 0,20,2. The diagonal products generate the primary anticanonical ring, and SX(G)=4116,[DW]=4132h+c.S_X(G)=\frac{41}{16},\qquad [D_W]=\frac{41}{32}h+c.

Proof. The construction is the same weighted extraction as before; at qq one uses the pencil parameter ss in place of the vanishing normal coordinate. The formula in (47.1) gives its transition explicitly. On the coarse surface [A:s][A:s] are homogeneous coordinates on a fixed projective line. The branch section is Qh(w0,w1)A=w1gh(w0,w1)s,Q_h(w_0,w_1)A=w_1g_h(w_0,w_1)s, where Qh=w02+βw0w1−εw12Q_h=w_0^2+\beta w_0w_1-\varepsilon w_1^2 and ghg_h is either w0w_0 or w1w_1. The two coefficients on the right and left have no common zero: at the closed-orbit point this follows from Q(0)=1Q(0)=1, and at qq it follows from smoothness of CC. Thus the coarse surface is the trivial ruled surface, and DD is a smooth section of class h+2ch+2c. The weight-two chart is the quotient chart of weights (1,1,0)(1,1,0), so the extraction is plt, its discrepancy is 33, and the different is 12D\frac12D. Since LZ=1LZ=1, adjunction gives the restrictions displayed in the statement.

For completeness, the primary ring here is the same prime Pfaffian ring used in Lemma 46.2; only the chosen pencil changes. The pair consisting of the initial forms of f,gf,g is a regular sequence. This can also be checked directly from its five equations. For g=x0g=x_0, the boundary component with A≠0A\ne0 has u=w=0u=w=0 and vJ+A2=0vJ+A^2=0, while the part with A=0A=0 is the remaining rank-one cone; the form v+βA+εJv+\beta A+\varepsilon J vanishes identically on neither three-dimensional component. For g=wg=w, its open part x0≠0x_0\ne0 has J=0J=0, A=u2/x0A=u^2/x_0, T=u3/x02T=u^3/x_0^2, and the equation of ff solves for vv. On its boundary x0=0x_0=0 one has u=0u=0 and vJ+A2=0vJ+A^2=0, and again ff cuts the dimension by one. Hence in either case the simultaneous zero locus has dimension two. Lemma 43.1 therefore proves that the graph ring is integral and is the full associated algebra of global sections. Injection into its localized normal-coordinate model identifies it with the actual primary refinement, including its cancellations.

The Pfaffian weights and graph weights are unchanged. The Hilbert-series calculation therefore gives SX(G)=54⋅2920+38⋅2=4116.S_X(G)=\frac54\cdot\frac{29}{20}+\frac38\cdot2 =\frac{41}{16}. A piece of anticanonical degree mm and primary degree jj has numerical class mc+j2hmc+\frac j2h on GG. Averaging gives [DW][D_W]. ◻

Lemma 47.2. At every point r∈G\Dr\in G\setminus D one has δr(G,12D;W)≥3231.\delta_r(G,\tfrac12D;W)\ge\frac{32}{31}.

Proof. Let B=(A=0)B=(A=0) and B′=(s=0)B'=(s=0); they are disjoint horizontal sections. The principal filtrations by the original hyperplane sections x2,x1x_2,x_1 and by the original pencil section induce the following lower bounds for fixed coefficients in the refined series: S(W;B)≥516,S(W;B′)≥1116,S(W;D)≥532.S(W;B)\ge\frac5{16},\qquad S(W;B')\ge\frac{11}{16},\qquad S(W;D)\ge\frac5{32}. Indeed their primary initial sections are A,u,sA,u,s. The last is the strict pencil section of class FF; the hyperplane section ff instead has initial form g(w)sg(w)s. The first has multiplicity one along BB, the last has multiplicity one along B′B', and the odd section uu has coarse divisor D/2D/2. Choose a basis simultaneously compatible with the principal filtration and the primary filtration. Divisibility by a power of the original section implies divisibility of its initial section by the same power. Averaging the dimensions proves the asserted inequalities from SX(H)=5/16S_X(H)=5/16 and SX(F)=11/16S_X(F)=11/16. Additional vertical components have nonnegative coefficients and do not weaken them.

Choose the horizontal section CC through rr. If C≠BC\ne B, the coefficient of hh in [DW][D_W] and the bound for BB give S(W;C)≤41/32−5/16=31/32S(W;C)\le41/32-5/16=31/32. If C=BC=B, use B′B' instead and obtain the stronger bound 19/3219/32. Lemma 43.6, applied with the fixed curve DD, gives S(WC;r)≤([DW]−532D)⋅C=1−516=1116.S(W^C;r)\le \bigl([D_W]-\tfrac5{32}D\bigr)\cdot C =1-\frac5{16}=\frac{11}{16}. Here C2=0C^2=0 and r∉Dr\notin D, so the different on CC has coefficient zero at rr. Local Abban–Zhuang adjunction now gives min{32/31,16/11}=32/31\min\{32/31,16/11\}=32/31. ◻

Proposition 47.3. Let p∈Zp\in Z be a smooth point of the quintic del Pezzo fibre containing ZZ. Then the weighted extraction along ZZ proves δp(X)≥8079.\delta_p(X)\ge\frac{80}{79}. This includes the point where the strict transform of ZZ meets the exceptional divisor of X→V5X\to V_5.

Proof. Points of GG outside DD are covered by Lemma 47.2. At a finite nonzero base point w=cw=c, smoothness of the fibre says Q(c)≠0Q(c)\ne0: along ZZ its ordinary normal derivative is Q(c)dvQ(c)\,dv. Lemma 47.4 therefore handles the whole ruling over such a point, in both normalizations g=1g=1 and g=wg=w. The remaining points of DD are exactly the endpoint cases treated in Proposition 47.5: the closed-orbit point when g=1g=1, the pencil base point at infinity when g=1g=1, and the coincident closed-orbit and pencil base point when g=wg=w. In the last normalization, every other specified base point may be chosen finite and nonzero as above. These cases exhaust the exceptional surface above smooth points of the fibre.

All of the refined bounds just cited are at least 80/7980/79. The primary ratio is AX(G)/SX(G)=3/(41/16)=48/41>1A_X(G)/S_X(G)=3/(41/16)=48/41>1. Applying the local Abban–Zhuang inequality to GG gives the lower bound min{48/41,80/79}=80/79\min\{48/41,80/79\}=80/79. Points where the fibre is singular are handled separately by the point-extraction lemmas and are not assumed to satisfy Q(c)≠0Q(c)\ne0. ◻

Lemma 47.4 (A ruling away from the special base points). In the weight-(1,2)(1,2) line model with G≃𝔽0G\simeq\mathbb F_0, write A=u2+vw,T=uA,f=(α+γw)A+v,F=f/g(w).A=u^2+vw,\qquad T=uA,\qquad f=(\alpha+\gamma w)A+v,\qquad F=f/g(w). Here g(w)g(w) is either 11 or ww. Let c≠0c\ne0 and suppose that q=1+αc+γc2≠0q=1+\alpha c+\gamma c^2\ne0. The refined threshold at every point of the ruling Cc=(w=c)C_c=(w=c) is at least 80/7980/79.

Proof. Put z=w−cz=w-c, r=α+γcr=\alpha+\gamma c, and Uc=A−cvU_c=A-cv. Rescale the pencil section by the nonzero constant g(c)g(c) and denote the resulting section again by FF. Thus F|w=c=f|w=cF|_{w=c}=f|_{w=c}. Record exponents of (u,v,z)(u,v,z), taking the normal degree u+2vu+2v first, then the zz-order, and then the uu-order. The following leading vectors are supplied by actual degree-one anticanonical sections: (0,0,0),(0,0,1),(2,0,1),(3,0,0),(0,2,0),(1,2,0),(0,2,1).(0,0,0),(0,0,1),(2,0,1),(3,0,0), (0,2,0),(1,2,0),(0,2,1). Indeed use 1,z1,z, then qzA−czFqzA-czF, qT−cFuqT-cFu, FvFv, FTFT, and FzAFzA. All these are actual anticanonical sections. In particular zF=(w−c)FzF=(w-c)F is a difference of two products of a hyperplane section and the pencil section. In the case g=wg=w, it can equally be written cf−c2(f/w)cf-c^2(f/w); no multiplication by an additional hyperplane factor is used. On z=0z=0 we have A=u2+cvA=u^2+cv and F=ru2+qvF=ru^2+qv, so the asserted initial terms are nonzero because c,q≠0c,q\ne0.

The degree-two section R=q2FT2−F2(c(q+1)Uc2+qc2Ucv)R=q^2FT^2-F^2\bigl(c(q+1)U_c^2+qc^2U_cv\bigr) restricts on z=0z=0 to Fu6Fu^6. This follows from the polynomial identity U3=q2U(U+cV)2−(rU+qV)(c(q+1)U2+qc2UV),q=1+rc.U^3=q^2U(U+cV)^2-(rU+qV) \bigl(c(q+1)U^2+qc^2UV\bigr),\qquad q=1+rc. Thus RR supplies the normalized vector (3,1/2,0)(3,1/2,0). All its summands use two hyperplane factors and at most two pencil factors, so they are genuine sections of 2L2L.

The hull of these eight vectors has volume 10/310/3 and first moment (79/24,21/8,35/24)(79/24,21/8,35/24). Its centroid is (79/80,63/80,7/16)(79/80,63/80,7/16). The lattice is the full lattice after adjoining the remaining degree-one sections uu and vv. The full-volume lemma therefore gives S(W;Cc)=7/16,S(WCc;D∩Cc)=79/160.S(W;C_c)=7/16,\qquad S(W^{C_c};D\cap C_c)=79/160. The factor 1/21/2 in the second equality comes from the coarse uniformizer u2/vu^2/v at the point of the different. The total expected degree on the weighted ruling is SX(G)/2=41/32S_X(G)/2=41/32. At any other point, simultaneous bases give an upper bound 41/32−79/160=63/8041/32-79/160=63/80.

The discrepancy of CcC_c is one. On the ruling the different has coefficient 1/21/2 at D∩CcD\cap C_c and no other support. Hence Abban–Zhuang adjunction gives the lower bound min{16/7,(1/2)/(79/160),1/(63/80)}=80/79.\min\{16/7,\ (1/2)/(79/160),\ 1/(63/80)\}=80/79. ◻

47.1 The two end fibres of the weighted ruled surface

Proposition 47.5. In the 𝔽0\mathbb F_0 case of the weighted line extraction, the remaining points of the branch section over the two end points of the line have local refined threshold greater than one. More precisely, the bounds are 40/2940/29 at the closed-orbit point when it is not on CC, 160/117160/117 at C∩ZC\cap Z when this is not the closed-orbit point, and 32/2732/27 when these two points coincide.

Proof. We give the three local computations together, retaining the primary degree in every calculation. Denote the primary degree by jj. On the chart s=1s=1 of the coarse exceptional surface, the seven HH-sections and their primary degrees are (47.2)(1,w,u,A,uA,wA,χs),(0,0,1,2,3,2,2),\label{f214:eq:F0-endpointH} (1,w,u,A,uA,wA,\chi s),\qquad (0,0,1,2,3,2,2), and the two FF-sections are 1,s1,s, of primary degrees zero and two. The branch cover is smooth, with coordinate uu, and the local relation is u2=Q(w)A−r(w)s,Q(0)=1.u^2=Q(w)A-r(w)s,\qquad Q(0)=1. The three cases are r(w)χI:closed-orbit point not on Cw1II:C∩Z not closed-orbitwwIII:C∩Z closed-orbitw2w.\begin{array}{c|cc} &r(w)&\chi\\\hline \mathrm{I}:\ \text{closed-orbit point not on }C&w&1\\ \mathrm{II}:\ C\cap Z\text{ not closed-orbit}&w&w\\ \mathrm{III}:\ C\cap Z\text{ closed-orbit}&w^2&w. \end{array} In Case II the coordinate ww is the reciprocal of the original affine coordinate on the line: all HH-sections are divided by the original coordinate. In particular the last HH-section is wsws, rather than ss. This distinction changes the expected order. Multiplying each fixed-degree section by a common power of the unit QQ clears its denominator, and changes none of the orders used below.

In Cases I and II, blow up the coarse surface at the point. Its exceptional curve K≅ℙ1K\cong\mathbb P^1 has discrepancy 3/23/2 for the pair with boundary 12D\frac12D. On the cover its valuation has weights (u,w)=(1,2)(u,w)=(1,2) and ramification index two. Let PD∈KP_D\in K be the point of the strict transform of DD. After taking this weighted initial form, take the lowest uu exponent. Record the resulting exponents and the primary degree as (a,b,j)(a,b,j). The coarse order at PDP_D is a/2a/2.

Besides the sections in (47.2) and their products with ss, we use the degree-two section T=(uA)2+(sw)(swA)−(wA)(sA).T=(uA)^2+(sw)(swA)-(wA)(sA). Every factor on the right is a degree-one anticanonical section. On the chart s=1s=1, put N=u2+wN=u^2+w, so A=N/QA=N/Q. If Q=1+βw+γw2Q=1+\beta w+\gamma w^2, then Q2T=N(u4+βw3+γw4).Q^2T=N\bigl(u^4+\beta w^3+\gamma w^4\bigr). Its weighted initial form is u4(u2+w)u^4(u^2+w), and its recorded vector is (4,1,6)(4,1,6). In Case II we also have T′=(uA)(suA)+(sχs)(swA)−(swA)(sA).T'=(uA)(suA)+(s\chi s)(swA)-(swA)(sA). Since χ=w\chi=w, this is sTsT as a local rational function, and has vector (4,1,8)(4,1,8). The notation sχss\chi s denotes the product of the FF-section ss with the HH-section χs\chi s; thus every factor is again a genuine degree-one anticanonical section.

The convex hulls of the degree-normalized certified vectors have the following vertices: I(0,0,0),(0,0,4),(0,1,0),(0,2,2),(0,2,4),(1,1,5),(2,0,2),(2,1/2,3)II(0,0,0),(0,0,2),(0,1,0),(0,1,4),(0,2,2),(0,2,4),(1,1,5),(2,0,2),(2,0,4),(2,1/2,3),(2,1/2,4).\begin{array}{c|l} \mathrm{I}&(0,0,0),(0,0,4),(0,1,0),(0,2,2),(0,2,4),\\ &(1,1,5),(2,0,2),(2,1/2,3)\\[2pt] \mathrm{II}&(0,0,0),(0,0,2),(0,1,0),(0,1,4),(0,2,2),(0,2,4),\\ &(1,1,5),(2,0,2),(2,0,4),(2,1/2,3),(2,1/2,4). \end{array} Both have Euclidean volume 20/320/3. The value lattice is {(a,b,j):a≡j(mod2)}\{(a,b,j):a\equiv j\pmod2\}, of index two; after including the anticanonical degree, the displayed actual sections generate this full lattice. Thus the normalized volume is 10/310/3, the leading coefficient of NmN_m. The full-volume lemma gives the exact centroids I:(4980,2940,4116),II:(117160,233320,4116).\mathrm{I}:\left(\frac{49}{80},\frac{29}{40},\frac{41}{16}\right), \qquad \mathrm{II}:\left(\frac{117}{160},\frac{233}{320},\frac{41}{16}\right). These figures follow directly by coning the listed rational faces to the origin and summing determinants; in particular their native-degree component provides an independent check against SX(G)=41/16S_X(G)=41/16.

Dividing the cover weight a+2ba+2b by two gives S(W;K)S(WK;PD)I33/3249/160II35/32117/320.\begin{array}{c|cc} &S(W;K)&S(W^K;P_D)\\\hline \mathrm{I}&33/32&49/160\\ \mathrm{II}&35/32&117/320. \end{array} The different on KK is 12PD\frac12P_D. Its residual divisors have total expected degree S(W;K)S(W;K). Simultaneous bases at PDP_D and any other point show that the latter point terms are at most 29/4029/40 and 233/320233/320, respectively. Hence Abban–Zhuang gives I:min{1611,8049,4029}=4029,II:min{4835,160117,320233}=160117.\mathrm{I}:\quad \min\left\{\frac{16}{11},\frac{80}{49},\frac{40}{29}\right\} =\frac{40}{29}, \qquad \mathrm{II}:\quad \min\left\{\frac{48}{35},\frac{160}{117},\frac{320}{233}\right\} =\frac{160}{117}.

Consider Case III. After rescaling the cover coordinate and AA, its relation can be written u2=w2s−Q(w)Au^2=w^2s-Q(w)A, with Q(0)=1Q(0)=1. Blow up the coarse point with weights (w,A)=(1,2)(w,A)=(1,2). The exceptional curve K≅ℙ(1,2)K\cong\mathbb P(1,2) has discrepancy 3−12⋅2=23-\frac12\cdot2=2. On the cover this is the ordinary blowup of (w,u)(w,u); its divisorial ramification index is one. Put u=w+Yu=w+Y, and refine first by total degree in w,Yw,Y, and then by the YY order. This is the point PAP_A of A=0A=0 on KK.

The degree-one sections give the thirteen vectors, in the order (Y,w,j)(Y,w,j), (0,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,1,2),(1,2,3),(1,2,2),(0,1,2),(0,0,2),(0,1,3),(1,1,4),(1,2,5),(1,2,4),(0,1,4).\begin{gathered} (0,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,1,2),(1,2,3),(1,2,2),(0,1,2),\\ (0,0,2),(0,1,3),(1,1,4),(1,2,5),(1,2,4),(0,1,4). \end{gathered} There are two more certified degree-two sections: U=(uA)2−(wA)(swA)=−QA3,U′=(uA)(suA)−(swA)2=−sQA3.U=(uA)^2-(wA)(swA)=-Q A^3, \qquad U'=(uA)(suA)-(swA)^2=-sQ A^3. Since the initial form of AA is −Y(2w+Y)-Y(2w+Y), their vectors are (3,3,6)(3,3,6) and (3,3,8)(3,3,8). The resulting hull has vertices (0,0,0),(0,0,2),(0,1,0),(0,1,4),(1,1,4),(1,2,2),(1,2,5),(3/2,3/2,3),(3/2,3/2,4).(0,0,0),(0,0,2),(0,1,0),(0,1,4),(1,1,4), (1,2,2),(1,2,5),(3/2,3/2,3),(3/2,3/2,4). It has volume 10/310/3, generates the full value lattice, and has centroid (187320,353320,4116).\left(\frac{187}{320},\frac{353}{320},\frac{41}{16}\right). Thus S(W;K)=27/16S(W;K)=27/16 and S(WK;PA)=187/320S(W^K;P_A)=187/320. The total expected degree on the coarse weighted curve is 12S(W;K)=27/32\frac12S(W;K)=27/32. At any other point it is therefore at most 83/32083/320.

The different of KK consists of two distinct points of coefficient 1/21/2: its quotient point and its intersection with the strict transform of DD. Neither is PAP_A. The two cover points u=wu=w and u=−wu=-w map to PAP_A; they have the same vanishing order because each fixed primary-degree piece has fixed parity in uu. Consequently the curve threshold is at least min{320/187,160/83}\min\{320/187,160/83\}, while the first ratio is 2/(27/16)=32/272/(27/16)=32/27. This proves the last asserted bound. ◻