Text size

Section 46

Lines of the second kind: the ruled surface 𝔽2\mathbb F_2

In this section FF is a quintic del Pezzo fibre with an A4A_4 point p0p_0, and ZZ is its unique line. We use the coordinates of the preceding normal-form lemma. Thus, on x0=1x_0=1, the threefold V5V_5 has coordinates u=x1u=x_1, v=x4v=x_4, w=x5w=x_5, and its hyperplane sections are spanned by 1,w,u,u2+vw,u3+uvw+v2,v,uv−u2w−vw2.1,\quad w,\quad u,\quad u^2+vw,\quad u^3+uvw+v^2,\quad v,\quad uv-u^2w-vw^2. Here Z=(u=v=0)Z=(u=v=0) and p0=(u=v=w=0)p_0=(u=v=w=0). The fibre equation is f=x6+γx3f=x_6+\gamma x_3. The other pencil generator, denoted by gg, restricts to a nonzero linear form on ZZ which does not vanish at p0p_0. After an automorphism preserving p0p_0 and ZZ, we take g|Z=x0g|_Z=x_0. Thus q=Z∩Cq=Z\cap C is the point w=∞w=\infty.

Lemma 46.1. The weight-(1,2)(1,2) extraction along ZZ, with weights one on uu and two on vv away from qq, is a plt extraction σ:X̂→X\sigma:\widehat X\to X. Its exceptional surface GG is isomorphic to 𝔽2\mathbb F_2. Write BB for its section of self-intersection −2-2, and cc for a ruling. Then AX(G)=3,ΔG=12D,D∼B+3c,G|G=−12(B+c),L|G=c.A_X(G)=3,\qquad \Delta_G=\tfrac12 D,\qquad D\sim B+3c,\qquad G|_G=-\tfrac12(B+c),\qquad L|_G=c. The curve DD is a smooth section; its intersection with BB is the point r0r_0 lying over p0p_0.

Proof. At infinity put t=x0/x5t=x_0/x_5, a=x1/x5a=x_1/x_5, and b=x6/x5b=x_6/x_5. These are regular parameters on V5V_5 near qq. On their overlap with the first chart, a=tu,b=tuv−u2−v/t.a=tu,\qquad b=tuv-u^2-v/t. On XX, write s=f/gs=f/g. The weighted initial equation at qq is b=tsb=ts; the variables a,s,ta,s,t are regular parameters there, and their normal weights are (1,2,0)(1,2,0). The two weighted ideals agree on the overlap. For the coarse exceptional surface put U=u2U=u^2 and V=vV=v. Its transition to the infinity chart is U′=t2U,S′=−t−1U−t−2V.U'=t^2U,\qquad S'=-t^{-1}U-t^{-2}V. The associated rank-two bundle splits as 𝒪(1)⊕𝒪(−1)\mathcal O(1)\oplus \mathcal O(-1). Indeed its positive subbundle is generated on the finite chart by (U,V)=(w,−1)(U,V)=(w,-1) and on the other chart by (U′,S′)=(1,0)(U',S')=(1,0). Consequently the coarse surface is 𝔽2\mathbb F_2, and its negative section has equation U+wV=0U+wV=0.

The weight-two chart of the extraction is the quotient of a smooth chart by an involution acting with weights (1,1,0)(1,1,0). It follows directly that the pair with its reduced exceptional divisor is plt, with different one half of the section D=(u=0)D=(u=0). The discrepancy is 1+2=31+2=3. The displayed transition shows that D2=4D^2=4; hence D∼B+3cD\sim B+3c. On the finite chart D∩BD\cap B is given by w=0w=0. Finally LZ=1LZ=1 gives L|G=cL|_G=c, and adjunction KG+ΔG=KX|G+3G|GK_G+\Delta_G=K_X|_G+3G|_G gives the stated restriction of GG. ◻

Lemma 46.2. Put A=u2+vwA=u^2+vw. On the chart where the initial form of gg is x0x_0, the refinement WW of the anticanonical ring by GG is the graded algebra generated in degree one by (46.1)Hi,wAHi(Hi∈{1,w,u,A,uA,v,wA}).\label{f214:eq:a4-line-generators} H_i,\quad wA H_i\qquad \bigl(H_i\in\{1,w,u,A,uA,v,wA\}\bigr). The normal grading is degu=1\deg u=1, degv=degA=2\deg v=\deg A=2, and degw=0\deg w=0. Moreover SX(G)=4116,[DW]=4132B+7332c,S_X(G)=\frac{41}{16},\qquad [D_W]=\frac{41}{32}B+\frac{73}{32}c, where [DW][D_W] denotes the limiting numerical class of its basis divisors.

Proof. Use homogeneous variables (x0,u,A,T,v,w,J)(x_0,u,A,T,v,w,J) for the seven initial hyperplane sections. The candidate initial equations are vw−x0A+u2,vJ−uT+A2,−x0T+uA,−x0J−Aw,−Tw−uJ.vw-x_0A+u^2,\quad vJ-uT+A^2,\quad -x_0T+uA,\quad -x_0J-Aw,\quad -Tw-uJ. They are the signed maximal Pfaffians, up to a common sign, of (00J−TA00−w−ux0−Jw0A−uTu−A0v−A−x0u−v0).\begin{pmatrix} 0&0&J&-T&A\\ 0&0&-w&-u&x_0\\ -J&w&0&A&-u\\ T&u&-A&0&v\\ -A&-x_0&u&-v&0 \end{pmatrix}. After inverting x0x_0, the equations give A=(u2+vw)/x0A=(u^2+vw)/x_0, T=uA/x0T=uA/x_0, and J=−wA/x0J=-wA/x_0, so this open algebra is a polynomial algebra in x0±1,u,v,wx_0^{\pm1},u,v,w, of dimension four. On x0=0,A≠0x_0=0,A\ne0, one has u=w=0u=w=0 and vJ+A2=0vJ+A^2=0; A,v,TA,v,T give three independent parameters, with A,vA,v invertible. On x0=A=0,v≠0x_0=A=0,v\ne0, the equations instead give w=−u2/vw=-u^2/v and J=uT/vJ=uT/v, with parameters v,u,Tv,u,T. Finally, on x0=A=v=0x_0=A=v=0, one has u=0u=0 and Tw=0Tw=0, leaving a locus of dimension two in T,w,JT,w,J. Thus the whole boundary has dimension three. The ideal has height three, so its Pfaffian resolution makes the quotient Cohen–Macaulay of pure dimension four. Since the boundary contains no component, x0x_0 is a nonzerodivisor. Injection into the polynomial localization then proves that the quotient is a domain. Its graded Pfaffian resolution has the same Hilbert series as the coordinate ring of VV. The candidate equations belong to the initial ideal, and equality of Hilbert functions proves equality of the ideals. The localized graph in the normal parameters also identifies this weight filtration with the geometric normal filtration.

The pair (J,x0)(J,x_0) is regular in this primary initial ring. Indeed, on J=x0=0J=x_0=0 its equations are u2+vw=0u^2+vw=0, uT=A2uT=A^2, uA=Aw=Tw=0uA=Aw=Tw=0. Their support has A=0A=0. On T≠0T\ne0 one has u=w=0u=w=0 and two parameters T,vT,v; on T=0T=0 it is the two-dimensional cone u2+vw=0u^2+vw=0. Thus the common zero locus has dimension two. Lemma 43.1 applies to the graph equations J=eaJ=ea, x0=ebx_0=eb: their quotient is a domain and is the full initial section algebra. On x0=b=1x_0=b=1 it yields e=1e=1, a=−wAa=-wA, and the diagonal anticanonical algebra is exactly (46.1). Its fixed-degree components therefore include all cancellations among global sections.

The seven primary weights are (0,1,2,3,2,0,2)(0,1,2,3,2,0,2), the five Pfaffian weights are (2,4,3,2,3)(2,4,3,2,3), and the final shift is seven. Differentiating the Pfaffian Hilbert series gives SH(G)=14⋅10−320⋅7=29/20S_H(G)=\frac14\cdot10-\frac3{20}\cdot7=29/20. The graph Hilbert series then gives SX(G)=54(29/20)+38⋅2=41/16S_X(G)=\frac54(29/20)+\frac38\cdot2=41/16. Equivalently this last number follows from the independent moment certificate below. A section of normal degree jj restricts to the class mc+j2(B+c)m c+\frac j2(B+c); taking its average proves the class formula. ◻

Lemma 46.3. For the further refinement by BB one has S(W;B)=307320,S(WB;r0)=263320.S(W;B)=\frac{307}{320},\qquad S(W^B;r_0)=\frac{263}{320}. For every other point r∈Br\in B, S(WB;r)≤261/320S(W^B;r)\le261/320. For every ruling cpc_p of GG, S(W;cp)≤263/320S(W;c_p)\le263/320.

Proof. Work at the generic point of BB, invert ww, and substitute v=(A−u2)/wv=(A-u^2)/w. The valuation is ordered first by normal degree j=2a+bj=2a+b, then by the exponent aa of AA, and finally by the exponent dd of ww. Its monomial coordinates are (a,b,d)(a,b,d) for AaubwdA^a u^b w^d. The following nine points are valuations divided by section degree: i123456789Pi(0,0,0)(0,0,1)(0,2,−1)(1,2,0)(1,0,2)(2,1,1)(2,0,2)(2,0,1/2)(3/2,0,0).\begin{array}{c|rrrrrrrrr} i&1&2&3&4&5&6&7&8&9\\\hline P_i&(0,0,0)&(0,0,1)&(0,2,-1)&(1,2,0)&(1,0,2)& (2,1,1)&(2,0,2)&(2,0,1/2)&(3/2,0,0). \end{array} The first seven are supplied by 1,w,v,(wA)v,w(wA),(wA)(uA),(wA)21,w,v,(wA)v,w(wA),(wA)(uA),(wA)^2. The last two come from the degree-two sections wA4wA^4 and A3A^3. They are genuine sections: writing J=wAJ=wA and T=uAT=uA, one has A3=JAv+T2,wA4=J2Av+JT2.A^3=JAv+T^2,\qquad wA^4=J^2Av+JT^2. Each product uses at most two hyperplane generators and at most two pencil generators. The signs of JJ can harmlessly be reversed.

Their convex hull has volume 10/310/3. For a directly checkable integral certificate, triangulate its facets from the origin with triples (8,4,6),(8,7,6),(4,2,5),(4,2,3),(7,4,5),(7,4,6),(8,4,3),(8,9,3).(8,4,6),(8,7,6),(4,2,5),(4,2,3), (7,4,5),(7,4,6),(8,4,3),(8,9,3). The respective tetrahedral volumes are 5/12,1/2,1/3,1/3,2/3,1/3,1/2,1/45/12,1/2,1/3,1/3,2/3,1/3,1/2,1/4. The sum of their first moments is (307/96,103/48,5/3)(307/96,103/48,5/3). Thus the centroid is (307320,103160,12).\left(\frac{307}{320},\frac{103}{160},\frac12\right). The valuation lattice is the full integer lattice, since 1,A,u,w1,A,u,w are degree-one sections. After substituting v=(A−u2)/wv=(A-u^2)/w, the finite degree-one generating list in Lemma 46.2 consists of Laurent polynomials in A,u,wA,u,w. Every exponent occurring in a product of mm generators has absolute value at most a fixed constant times mm. Taking linear combinations and pivot monomials preserves this bound. Thus signed exponents satisfy the boundedness hypothesis of Lemma 34.2. Its volume agrees with L3/6=10/3L^3/6=10/3, so that lemma identifies these with the moments of the entire refinement. In particular it yields S(W;B)=307/320S(W;B)=307/320 and, independently, SX(G)=2(307/320)+103/160=41/16S_X(G)=2(307/320)+103/160=41/16.

On BB, the relation is u2=−vwu^2=-vw. At r0r_0 the coordinate vv is nonzero, so the order of A−aAaubwdA^{-a}A^a u^b w^d on the coarse curve is b/2+db/2+d. Its mean is 103/320+1/2=263/320103/320+1/2=263/320. The total degree of the refined divisors on BB is (4132B+7332c−307320B)B=13180.\left(\frac{41}{32}B+\frac{73}{32}c -\frac{307}{320}B\right)B=\frac{131}{80}. For any other point, choose a basis compatible with that point and r0r_0 in each restricted graded piece. Subtracting the known mean at r0r_0 bounds the other mean by 131/80−263/320=261/320131/80-263/320=261/320. Finally a basis compatible with BB and a ruling cpc_p restricts to a basis on BB whose order at B∩cpB\cap c_p is at least its order along cpc_p. The preceding two bounds therefore imply S(W;cp)≤263/320S(W;c_p)\le263/320 for every ruling. ◻

Remark 46.4. The secondary initial graph ring is not used in the preceding lemma. After taking the initial form along BB, the pair (J,x0)(J,x_0) ceases to be regular: the locus J=x0=u=w=0J=x_0=u=w=0 has the free coordinates A,T,vA,T,v. Using its unsaturated graph Hilbert series would give the incorrect number 15/1615/16 in place of 307/320307/320. The two explicit degree-two sections in the proof are essential. They enlarge the initial degree-one hull from volume 17/617/6 to the required volume 10/310/3.

Proposition 46.5. Every point p∈Z\{p0}p\in Z\setminus\{p_0\} satisfies δp(X)≥320/307>1\delta_p(X)\ge320/307>1.

Proof. First consider r∈G\Br\in G\setminus B and use its ruling cpc_p as the surface flag. The residual-degree lemma, subtracting the mean along BB before restricting, bounds the point invariant by (4132B+7332c−307320B)cp=103320.\left(\frac{41}{32}B+\frac{73}{32}c -\frac{307}{320}B\right)c_p=\frac{103}{320}. The boundary DD meets cpc_p transversally once. Hence the local discrepancy on cpc_p is either one or one half, while S(W;cp)≤263/320S(W;c_p)\le263/320. Surface adjunction therefore gives a threshold at least min{320/263,160/103}\min\{320/263,160/103\} at rr.

For r∈B\{r0}r\in B\setminus\{r_0\}, use BB as the flag. The different has no support at rr, and the preceding lemma gives threshold at least min{320/307,320/261}=320/307\min\{320/307,320/261\}=320/307. Thus the refined threshold is at least 320/307320/307 at every point of GG except possibly r0r_0, whose image on XX is p0p_0. Finally AX(G)/SX(G)=48/41>320/307A_X(G)/S_X(G)=48/41>320/307. Abban–Zhuang adjunction for the weighted curve extraction proves the assertion. ◻

46.1 The other 𝔽2\mathbb F_2 case

Proposition 46.6. Suppose that the fibre equation along the second-kind line is f=βx2+γx3+εx6f=\beta x_2+\gamma x_3+\varepsilon x_6, with β≠0\beta\ne0, and that C∩ZC\cap Z is smooth. Then every point of ZZ other than its closed-orbit point p0p_0 satisfies δp(X)≥16/15\delta_p(X)\ge16/15.

Proof. The point p0p_0 is a singular point of the fibre, so it is not on CC. Normalize q=C∩Zq=C\cap Z to w=∞w=\infty as above. Smoothness of CC at qq then gives ε≠0\varepsilon\ne0. Rescaling ww and the fibre equation makes its normal initial form (w−1)A(w-1)A. The weighted exceptional surface, boundary, and numerical class of the refined series are the same as in Lemma 46.1. The exact generators are now Hi,(w−1)AHiH_i,(w-1)A H_i, with the same seven HiH_i as before.

In the coordinates (A,u,w)(A,u,w), the following degree-one leading monomials are obtained by elementary row operations: (0,0,1),(2,1,0),(0,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,0,0),(0,2,−1),(1,0,2),(1,2,−1),(1,1,1).\begin{split} &(0,0,1),(2,1,0),(0,0,0),(2,0,1),(2,0,0),\\ &(0,2,-1),(1,0,2),(1,2,-1),(1,1,1). \end{split} Number these points consecutively from one to nine. For example the last three are obtained from wAwA, uAuA, and vv by multiplication by (w−1)A(w-1)A and subtraction of the lower terms. Their convex hull has volume 10/310/3 and first moment (25/8,55/24,7/8)(25/8,55/24,7/8), giving centroid (15/16,11/16,21/80)(15/16,11/16,21/80). A tetrahedral certificate from the origin is (8,9,6),(8,9,2),(8,5,2),(4,5,2),(9,7,1),(9,6,1),(4,9,7),(4,9,2),(8,9,6),(8,9,2),(8,5,2),(4,5,2), (9,7,1),(9,6,1),(4,9,7),(4,9,2), with volumes 1/2,2/3,1/3,1/3,1/6,1/3,1/2,1/21/2,2/3,1/3,1/3,1/6,1/3,1/2,1/2. Thus S(W;B)=15/16S(W;B)=15/16.

We also need the point r1∈Br_1\in B over w=1w=1. Put z=w−1z=w-1 and multiply every degree-mm section by the common unit wmw^m. Degree-one generators are then w,w2,uw,Aw,uAw,A−u2,w2A,w,w^2,uw,Aw,uAw,A-u^2,w^2A, and their products with zAzA. In the order (j,A,z)(j,A,z) their leading exponents (a,b,d)(a,b,d) have the ten vertices (1,2,1),(2,1,1),(2,0,2),(1,1,0),(0,2,0),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(0,0,1).(1,2,1),(2,1,1),(2,0,2),(1,1,0),(0,2,0), (0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(0,0,1). This hull again has volume 10/310/3; its first moment is (25/8,55/24,65/24)(25/8,55/24,65/24). One can use the triples (1,3,2),(9,1,3),(8,3,2),(4,1,5),(4,1,2),(10,1,5),(10,9,1),(8,4,2),(8,7,4),(1,3,2),(9,1,3),(8,3,2),(4,1,5),(4,1,2), (10,1,5),(10,9,1),(8,4,2),(8,7,4), whose volumes are 2/3,2/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/6,1/62/3,2/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,1/6,1/6. The full-volume lemma gives S(WB;r1)=13/16S(W^B;r_1)=13/16. The total degree on BB is now 51/3251/32, so at every other point its mean is at most 51/32−13/16=25/3251/32-13/16=25/32. In particular every ruling has mean at most 13/1613/16.

Away from BB, subtracting its mean before restricting to a ruling leaves point invariant at most 41/32−15/16=11/3241/32-15/16=11/32. The different on that ruling has coefficient at most one half, giving refined threshold at least min{16/13,16/11}\min\{16/13,16/11\}. On B\{r0}B\setminus\{r_0\} the different vanishes and the threshold is at least 16/1516/15. Abban–Zhuang adjunction and AX(G)/SX(G)=48/41A_X(G)/S_X(G)=48/41 give the assertion. ◻