Text size

Section 52

Completion of the proof for Family 2.14

Proof of the Family 2.14 assertion of Theorem 1.1. Suppose that a prime divisor VV over XX has βX(V)≤0\beta_X(V)\le0. Proposition 44.5 reduces its centre to a listed line, a point of such a line, or the node of a fibre of type A1A_1.

We first exclude every singular point of every fibre. Proposition 48.4, Corollary 49.3, and Theorem 51.1 give strict local threshold bounds at points of types A1,A2,A4A_1,A_2,A_4. At a point of type A3A_3, Lemmas 50.1 and 50.4 give AX(G)−SX(G)=9/16A_X(G)-S_X(G)=9/16 and refined threshold at least one. Lemma 43.7 therefore gives βX(V)≥916ordV(G)>0\beta_X(V)\ge\frac9{16}\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_V(G)>0 for every valuation centred at that point. The list in Lemma 43.2 contains no other singularity type.

It remains to exclude the listed lines and their smooth points on the fibre. Every such line meets the singular locus of its fibre, as follows from the same incidence configurations used in Proposition 44.5. A line on V5V_5 has normal bundle 𝒪⊕𝒪\mathcal O\oplus\mathcal O or 𝒪(1)⊕𝒪(−1)\mathcal O(1)\oplus\mathcal O(-1); these are the ordinary lines and lines of the second kind, respectively, by Lemma 43.5. For an ordinary line the pencil differential consequently has rank one. Lemmas 45.2 and 45.3 exclude the line centre and every point on it where the fibre is smooth.

For a line of the second kind use its standard model u=v=0u=v=0. A hyperplane containing it has equation αx1+βx2+γx3+δx4+εx6=0.\alpha x_1+\beta x_2+\gamma x_3+\delta x_4+\varepsilon x_6=0. If α≠0\alpha\ne0, its differential in the positive normal direction never vanishes on the line, so the hyperplane section is smooth along it. This is impossible for a listed line. Hence α=0\alpha=0. If δ=β=0\delta=\beta=0, normality of the fibre forces ε≠0\varepsilon\ne0, and its closed-orbit point is of type A4A_4. Proposition 46.5 treats the rest of that line. If δ=0\delta=0 and β≠0\beta\ne0, the closed-orbit point is a node, and Proposition 46.6 treats the rest. Finally, if δ≠0\delta\ne0, Proposition 47.3 treats every smooth point of the fibre on the line, including its intersection with EE. These three cases exhaust the lines of the second kind. For a valuation whose centre is the whole line, choose a general smooth point of the fibre on that line and apply the corresponding local bound.

Every centre allowed by the reduction has now been excluded. Therefore βX(V)>0\beta_X(V)>0 for every prime divisor over XX, and the valuative criterion proves K-stability. ◻

The different is retained throughout the line and point calculations. For example, the two positions of C∩ZC\cap Z on a line of the second kind lead to different local section lists, and hence to different expected orders at the end fibres. Likewise, the A3A_3 calculation gives a refined threshold of one; the positive term 9ordV(G)/169\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_V(G)/16 is essential in the last step.

No Zariski decomposition on a threefold obtained by a weighted point or curve extraction is used in this part. The elementary volume calculations occur on XX itself. For every extraction, a prime initial ring or a full-volume certificate identifies the actual section filtration. The computations include the additional sections obtained by cancellation. Restriction to a curve then uses its actual degrees and the zeros retained on a second divisor. These arguments supply the vanishing estimates that a threefold Zariski decomposition would otherwise have to provide.